In twentieth Century 80 years since the planning economic system in different countries have initiated a process approach to market economy. Such a wide range of institutional changes in the structure of any one of the rail system has produced a change in the system. Both the understanding of shape, moral customs, public habits, such as the rule of informal institutions, but also contains the constitution, the judiciary, the authorities, such as the rule of formal control. On the economic organization is no exception. In the planning under the premise of economic organizational forms a single, transition to a market economy inevitable request change the organization originally the scope and structure to adapt to the request of the new institutional and economic organization could conform to the new rail system against the past has a direct impact on the performance of transition. In China the microeconomic organization level produces change an example of township enterprises a new force suddenly rises, it to China's economic increase made great contribution. In Russia, the emergence of financial industrial groups to be represented in this regard. Russia's financial industry groups have emerged quickly, the scope of the eve of the end of 1990, has become the dominant economic situation in the organization. Why are financial industrial groups in Russia agile? What are the essential attributes of the financial industrial groups? Why in the case of all the economic recession, the objectives of the financial industrial groups adhere to increase and independent enterprises can compare may represent a better economic performance? Financial industrial groups in the future will be towards the evolution of what is going on, will continue to be strong and will disappear? What is the relationship between the financial industry groups in the transition process and what is the relationship between them and the economic transition, and how does it affect the economic transition? These are the results of this paper to pay close attention to. In this paper, the Russian financial industrial organization is designated as a central organization. From this perspective, it can be more clearly familiar with the nature of the financial industry groups in Russia, and the economic transition of the system in its formation and the future evolution of the resolution of the resolution. Through the process of rail system and Russian financial industrial group structure, attribute and external management mechanism, a detailed analysis, think this, Russian financial industrial group was born in the process of transition, it is of Russian economy no use rate of the rail system in the situation of a replacement. At the same time, as the rail of the main rail system control, it not only directly affect the performance of economic transition said also affect the display in the process of institutional change of other rail of dominant effect, and in order to side-effect in the transition process. Around the above thoughts, in addition to the introduction, the chapter of this article is the first chapter of the financial industry groups to discuss the actual basic. Financial industrial groups are a historical picture of the economic transition of Europe and the United States and Japan, South Korea and some emerging market countries in the late nineteenth Century. Through the process of analogy method, each country's financial industrial groups with significant differences from each other, bale some actual or emphasis is financial industrial groups in general, or is emphasized with a country's financial industrial groups. The general and special lack to illustrate the transition from a planned economy to a socialist market economy under the premise of Russian financial industrial groups a because of the premise of transition, Russian financial industrial groups showing characteristic differences in the historical stage of financial and industrial groups. In order to excavate the special attribute of the latter, it is necessary to pursue a new practical framework. In this paper, we take the view that financial industry groups as a central organization can accurately grasp the essence of the financial industrial groups in Russia. From the perspective of the attention to analyze the organization from the point of view of organization and institutional environment interaction, also have to mend their ways of the institutional economics and compare rail analysis and histological aspects of practical support. The second chapter is the description of the basic features of the Russian financial industrial groups, which further emphasizes that it is the justice of the central organization. Russian financial industrial groups both in the analogy aspects outside the organization members of the composition, structure, relationship between the members of the organization and other central organization, said the central organization of reality. The third chapter describes the impact of economic transition on the Russian financial industry groups. The transition of economic transition is the decisive factor that led to the transformation of the system of the financial industry in Russia. Economic transition chapeau to the action form of the enterprise has changed, in the planning under the premise, enterprises have no choice freedom of business object, after the start of economic transition, enterprises can choose in the market, financial industrial groups and the integration of external business, however conservative transition method formed market management and the management mechanism of the integration of no use rate. At the same time, because of the legacy of the Soviet era, "the company's Management Club" has further reduced the cost of the management of the central organization, the perception of the enterprise will choose the financial industry groups as a business approach. The impact of the early stage of the transition on the financial industry groups is also reflected in the external harmonic method of the financial industrial groups. Because of the economic transition brought about by the judicial lack of financial industrial groups outside the informal management of the dominant, and the property rights as the representative of the management of the representative 目录: |
