作 者：洪仁善[1] 姜言胜[2] HONG Ren-shan ,JIANG Yan-sheng （1. School of Foreign Languages,Qingdao University,Oingdao 266071,China; 2. School of Foreign Languages,Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China） 机构地区：[1]青岛学院外国语大学,山东青岛266071 [2]东北师范学院外国语大学,吉林长春130024 出 处：《东北师学院报：哲学社会科学版》2017年第2期50-54,共5页Journal of Northeast Normal University（Social Science） 基 金：国家社科基金项目（12BYY069）; 山东省高等学校人文社科项目（JI3WD11） 摘 要：近代以降,日本国内掀起了否定汉字、汉文化的风潮,罗马字论就是在这种背景下提出来的。罗马字论出炉之后,就因表记方式产生了分歧,表记方式的派系主要有两个。两派间的争论从明治时期一直持续到战后,现今两种表记方式依然共存。A campaign designed to negate Chinese characters and Chinese culture was launched after Japan entered into the modern era.It is in this background that the proposal on the use of Roman alphabets was set forth.Along with this proposal,came the battle between the two divergent views over the marking system of Roman alphabets.This debate lasted from the Meiji Period to the Postwar Period.Even today,both of the two marking systems are still in use.This paper aims to analyze the causes for the coexistence of the two marking systems,make an account of their historical development and elaborate on their current situation. 关 键 词：罗马字 文字改革 基督教 传教士 分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学] ，日语论文题目，日语论文 |
