| 汉语疑问句平日可分为四类：长短问句、选择问句、特指问句和正反问句。在曩昔的几十年，法语论文范文，长短问句、选择问句和特指问句一向是很多说话学家存眷的核心，然则对于汉语正反问句的研究却相当匮乏。为了更好的懂得和运用汉语正反问句，在客不雅描写的基本上，本文旨在对汉语正反问句的句法特点、语义差别和疑问水平做一个较为周全的研究。本论文起首从情势说话学角度商量了汉语正反问句的句法特点，在此基本上，深刻研究了汉语正反问句的语义差别和汉语正反问句能否都表现纯洁疑问等。对于汉语正反问句的句法特点，后人重要采取四种研究办法：转换剖析法、移位剖析法、功效领域剖析法和核心剖析法。这四类剖析法存在各自的缺点。本文提出了一种同一A-not-A推导进程的研究办法，加倍相符最简计划。该办法以为A-not-A疑问算子占领疑问短语的中间语地位。然后，在遵守比来吸引准绳的前提下，对A停止复制，构成VO-not-VO型基本重复问句。其它类型的重复问句情势经过线性化处置得出。重复问句中的特点核对是以分歧的措施完成，而非显性移位，其句法表示为A-not-A算子与标句词之间弗成以涌现量化词类型的阻隔成份。Shi-bu-shi类型的重复问句和ke-类问句都可采取该研究办法加以剖析。对于正反问句语义差别的成绩，本文以为汉语正反问句语义差别很年夜水平上受汉语否认词“不”和“没”的作用。汉语的正反问句有A-不-A和A-没-A两种表达情势。因为汉语否认词“不”和“没”的附加意义并不是老是雷同的，所以在A-不-A和A-没-A傍边表示出了语义差别。这篇论文研究发明A-不-A问句实用于静态表示、习气表示、非完成表示和客观表示的评判，法语论文范文，而A-没-A实用于静态表示、临时性行动表示、完成表示和客不雅表示的评判。而当A属于心思动词一类（好比认为、想、盘算、认可等）、所在动词一类（好比在）和敕令动词（好比让、请求等），A-不-A和A-没-A可以交换。对于正反问句疑问水平的成绩，本文基于徐杰等人提出的划分战略，提出了新的汉语问句疑问水平划分办法，该划分成果是隐约品级概念而非定量剖析的成果。在此基本上，将汉语正反问句的疑问水平分为：无穷趋近于0、25%、50%和100%四个品级，并用年夜量实例证实了该划分办法的可行性。 Abstract: Chinese interrogative sentence usually can be divided into four categories: the length of the questions, alternative questions, wh questions and questions. In the past decades, the length of the question, choose questions and wh question is always many linguists concern the core. However, for Chinese is a rhetorical question research is quite scarce. In order to better understand and apply the Chinese rhetorical question, in the description of the guest, this paper aims to make a more comprehensive research on the syntactic features, semantic differences and questions of the Chinese syntactic and rhetorical questions. This thesis discusses the syntactic features of the Chinese rhetorical question from the point of view of the theory of the situation. On the syntactic features of the Chinese positive rhetorical question sentence, four kinds of research methods are adopted: the transformation analysis, the displacement analysis, the effectiveness of the field analysis and the core analysis. These four kinds of analysis methods have their own disadvantages. This paper presents a method for the study of the same A-not-A derivation process, which is more consistent with the most simple scheme. The approach to the question of the A-not-A question is the intermediate language status of the interrogative phrase. Then, in accordance with the principle of attracting ratio, A stop copying, a VO-not-VO type basic repeat questions. Other types of repeat questions after linearization disposal of that situation. Repeat the question feature check to the differences in methods, rather than shifting dominance and their syntactic said for operator A-not-A and standard words and sentences between Eph into the emergence of quantifier type barrier composition. Type Shi-bu-shi and type ke- repeat questions questions can take the research methods to analyze. On the score of the semantic differences between positive and negative questions, the thesis thinks that the semantic difference of Chinese positive rhetorical question is very much influenced by the Chinese language "no" or "no". The positive rhetorical questions in Chinese are A- -A and A- two kinds of expressions of -A. Because the Chinese deny the word "no" and "not" additional meaning is not always identical, so in - A and a - didn't a sideways said the semantic differences. This paper studies the invention - not a question of practical static said, habit, non complete representation and objective representation of the evaluation, a - not a practical on the static representation, temporary action representation, complete representation and objectivity, said the judge. And when a belongs to the psychological verb class (like that, thinking, brooding, recognition, etc.), where the verb (like in) and invoke the verb (like, request, etc), the - A and a - no - can be exchanged. About is ask interrogative sentence level scores, this paper partition strategy based on the proposed by Xu et al proposed new Chinese interrogative level partition method and the results of the division is vaguely grade concept rather than a quantitative analysis of the results. In essentially, Chinese is rhetorical questions level points: infinite tends to 0, 25%, 50% and 100% four grade, and proves the feasibility of the classification approach with a large number of examples. 目录: |
