Abstract:

In this paper, the application of high frequency in ancient Chinese "Verb / in / out" as the research object, research content includes "Verb / into / out of the syntactic and semantic analysis, and analysis of cognitive grammar description. In the later research basically, this paper of "Verb / into / out of the" structure of synchronic stereo comprehensive description, speaking from the reality of hands-on and assessment "Verb /" and "Verb /" Pi paradox says scene, to discuss the formation reason of these PI paradox says scene. Excluding the preface and conclusion, this article is divided into three chapters: first chapter "Verb / in / out" syntactic and semantic characteristics: this chapter uses the situation and significance of the combination of principle, of "Verb / into / out of the" dynamic trend syntactic, semantic features to stop more specific description, for further remind "Verb /" and "Verb /" Application of PI paradox says the reason foundation. The second chapter "in / out" for trend of complement PI paradox says research (and): this chapter important from the use and assessment of "Verb / into / out PI paradox says scene. From the synchronic three-dimensional assessment of "Verb / into / out of the absurd scene said. An important difference is the "Verb / in / out" in the "verb" the number PI paradox says. From historical multi dimension evaluation "Verb / into / out of PI perverted said scene, exist two aspects of difference: the forming history time Rixi PI perverted and grammaticalization level PI paradox says. And that when the wrong that is a reason is wrong ". The third chapter "Verb / in / out" tendency and action type PI paradox says cognitive Description: this chapter important tendency and action "Verb / into / out of the" "in / out" the extension of roads and analyze the deficiency of motivation and mechanism. We thought of "Verb / into / out of" structure "in / out" from space to time displacement and displacement of righteousness righteousness from meaning to the status of spatial displacement displacement change mechanism of metaphor is righteousness.

目录:

封面   1-2  
文摘   2-3  
英文文摘   3-4  
声明   4-5  
零 绪论   5-10  
    0.1课题探讨的意义   5-5  
    0.2探讨的状况简介   5-9  
        0.2.1对于汉语动趋式的探讨   5-7  
        0.2.2对于“动词/进/出”的个案探讨   7-9  
    0.3探讨的理论和措施及语料来原源   9-10  
        0.3.1解决问题拟采用的理论、措施   9-9  
        0.3.2语料来源   9-10  
第一章“动词/进/出”动趋式句法、语义特征   10-18  
    1.1“动词/进”的句法、语义特征   10-13  
        1.1.1主语的特征   10-11  
        1.1.2动词的语义特征及分类   11-11  
        1.1.3趋向补语“进”的语义特点   11-12  
        1.1.4“动词/进”动趋式的特点   12-12  
        1.1.5宾语的特点   12-13  
        1.1.6小结   13-13  
    1.2“动词/出”动趋式的句法、语义特征   13-17  
        1.2.1主语的特点   13-14  
        1.2.2动词的语义特征及分类   14-15  
        1.2.3趋向补语“出”的语义特点   15-15  
        1.2.4“动词/出”动趋式的特点   15-16  
        1.2.5宾语的特点   16-17  
        1.2.6小结   17-17  
    1.3总结   17-18  
第二章“进/出”作趋向补语的不对称探讨   18-33  
    2.1“动词/进/出”的共时平面上的不对称   18-20  
        2.1.1搭配动词的数量的不对称   18-20  
    2.2“动词/进/出”的历时平面上的不对称   20-31  
        2.2.1历时角度上形成时间早晚的不对称   20-30  
        2.2.2语法化程度的不对称   30-31  
    2.3小结   31-33  
第三章“动词/进/出”动趋式不对称的认知解释   33-42  
    3.1动趋式“动词/进”中“进”的引申途径   33-35  
        3.1.1“进”的本义(空间位移义)   33-34  
        3.1.2“进”的时间位移义   34-34  
        3.1.3“进”的状态变化义   34-35  
    3.2动趋式“动词/出”中“出”的引申途径   35-38  
        3.2.1“出”的本义(空间位移义)   35-36  
        3.2.2“出”的时间位移义   36-36  
        3.2.3“出”的状态变化义   36-38  
    3.3动趋式“V/进/出”中“进/出”语义引申的差异点   38-41  
        3.3.1“进/出”语义引申的相同点   38-40  
        3.3.2“进/出”语义引申的不同点   40-40  
        3.3.3“进/出”虚化限制的认知动因   40-41  
    3.4小结   41-42  
结语   42-43  
参考文献   43-47  
后记   47-48  
攻读学位期间取得的探讨   48  

•  法国垃圾清理产业的环保经济效益探索

•  法语专业统医学院院长国际联席会议教学

•  简论中世纪法国城市的“自由”

•  基于文化性略论的档案馆功能探讨一以法

•  汉语、英语、法语现在时态的差异

•  法语教学论文范文:游戏教学法在法语课堂

•  勇武、德行与潇洒之美──中世纪法国小

•  A Report of the 2004 Electroacoustic Music Festival

•  法国建筑（文化）论文：我眼中的法国建

•  法语关系从句与英语定语从句比较初探

•  Self-Reflection on the Present Problems in Higher T

•  认知态度类动词的句法语义界面探讨一以

•  当代法语的变化发展

•  浅论多媒体法语教学的历史和优势

•  革命·法学·秩序一对法国大革命的解读