| 趋势动词和趋势补语句是古代汉语中研究的热门，也是留先生进修的难点。本文重要以动趋式“V/开去”为研究对象，运用构造主义语法、配价语法和认知说话学等说话实际，遵守情势和意义、描述息争释、静态与静态相联合的研究途径，对“V/开去”这一构造从句法、语义、认知、语用等角度做了比拟周全而充足的剖析和阐释。本文重要包含五部门第一章起首对趋势动词“开去”停止界定，法语论文范文，接着剖析了“V/开去”的句法功效，考核了与“V/开去”有关的几种句式和动趋式“V/开去”的配价。第二章对“V/开去”的语义停止了较为具体的研究。把动趋式“V/开去”的语义类型归结为四种趋势义、成果义、状况义和评说义，并对“V/开去”表现详细某一语义时的“V”停止分类及语义特点剖析。第三章联合认知说话学实际对“V/开去”的语义停止了较为充足的说明。起首剖析了“开去”的意向图式与语义的关系，然后解释位移事宜框架实际与“V/开去”句法构造的关系，最初运用框架语义实际、隐喻、客观化等实际对“V/开去”分歧语义之间的关系停止懂得释。第四章剖析了“V/开去”和“V/开来”成长的不屈衡性的表示，并对其作出说明，指出“V/开去”和“V/开来”的不屈衡性重要表现在运用频率上和“开来”、“开去”和动词的联合才能上。不屈衡性发生的最基本的缘由是“开来”是弱标志项，“开去”是强标志项。第五章为结语，对全文的重要不雅点停止总结。 Abstract: Trend verbs and trend complement are the hot spots in ancient Chinese, but also the difficulties in the study. This important to move the trend of "V / a terrifying" as the research object, using structural grammar, valence grammar and cognitive learning to speak and actual speech, comply with the situation and significance, description information release, static and static phase joint research approach, of "V / drove the structure from the point of view of syntactic, semantic, cognitive and pragmatic made relatively comprehensive and adequate analysis and interpretation. The important contains five departments in the first chapter, chapeau of tendency verbs "terrifying" definition, then analyzes the syntactic function of "V / a terrifying", examination of the valence and "V / a terrifying" about some sentence patterns and dynamic trend "V / a terrifying". The second chapter of "semantic V/ on" the study more specific. The dynamic trend "V / a terrifying" semantic types comes down to four trends of righteousness, into fruit of justice, righteousness and comment on the meaning, and show with a semantic of "V / a terrifying" of "V" stop classification and semantic feature analysis. The third chapter combined with cognitive linguistics to the actual "V/ on" semantic description is sufficient to stop. First analysis of the "terrifying" intention schema and semantic relationship, then explain the displacement matters framework and "V / a terrifying" syntactic structure relation, the initial framework for the application of actual meaning, metaphor, objective and practical relationship of "V / a terrifying" semantic differences between stop understand release. The fourth chapter analyzes the "V / a terrifying" and "V / open" growth not Qu Heng said, and the explanation, pointed out that "V / a terrifying" and "V / open" the unyielding balance performance in the application of frequency and the "open" and "terrifying" and the verb combined to. Not the most basic reason of Heng Qu is the "open" sign is weak, "open" is a strong sign. The fifth chapter is the conclusion, which summarizes the important point of the full text. 目录: 摘要 4-5 ABSTRACT 5 绪论 8-13 0.1 探讨近况综述 8-11 0.1.1 趋向动词的范围 8-9 0.1.2 趋向动词探讨概况 9-10 0.1.3 “开去”的探讨和不足 10-11 0.2 本文探讨的主要内容及探讨意义 11-12 0.2.1 主要内容 11 0.2.2 探讨意义 11-12 0.3 理论基础、探讨措施、语料来源及说明 12-13 1 “V/开去”的结构功能考察 13-19 1.1 “V 开去”结构 13-15 1.1.1 “V 开/去” 13 1.1.2 “V/开去” 13-15 1.2 “V/开去”的句法功能 15-16 1.3 与“V/开去”有关的句式及动趋式“V/开去”的配价 16-19 2 “V/开去”结构的语义略论 19-26 2.1 “V/开去”的语义类型 19-21 2.1.1 表示趋向义的“V/开去” 19-20 2.1.2 表示结果义的“V/开去” 20 2.1.3 表示状态义的“V/开去” 20-21 2.1.4 表示评说义的“V/开去” 21 2.2 “V/开去”中“V”的语义类 21-22 2.3 “V/开去”的语义类型与动词的类及语义特征的关系 22-26 2.3.1 趋向义“V/开去”与动词的类及语义特征 22-23 2.3.2 结果义“V/开去”与动词的类及语义特征 23-24 2.3.3 状态义“V/开去”与动词的类及语义特征 24-25 2.3.4 评说义“V/开去”与动词的类及语义特征 25-26 3 “V/开去”结构的认知探讨 26-33 3.1 “开去”的意向图式与语义的关系 26-27 3.2 位移事件框架与“V/开去”句法结构的关系 27-29 3.3 “V/开去”几种语义之间关系的理论解释 29-33 3.3.1 结果义和框架语义理论 29-30 3.3.2 状态义、评说义和隐喻 30-31 3.3.3 结果义、状态义、评说义和主观化 31-33 4 “V/开去”和“V/开来”的不平衡性 33-39 4.1 “V/开去”和“V/开来”不平衡性的表现 33-34 4.2 双音节化对“V/开来开去”不平衡性产生的作用 34-35 4.3 “V/开去”和“V/开来”不平衡性的原因 35-39 4.3.1 “V/开来开去”的不平衡性源于“来去”的不对称性 35-37 4.3.2 标记性与“开去”的晚起 37-39 结束语 39-42 参考文献 42-45 致谢 45-46 攻读学位期间发表论文以及参加科研情况 46-47 |
