| 本文重要考核了古代汉语里新发明的复句格局“不是p，也是q”中的一部门一类同比拟性妥协句式的句法、语义特点。本研究以该句式的说话现实为基本，以复句三分体系实际为根据，以语表、语里、语值的小三角研究为思绪，提出并采取了“妥协量级剖析法”，对类同比拟性妥协句式的句法、语义特点停止了较为详实的描述和归结，并对对峙比拟性让转句式同等形格局作了响应的思虑。第一章是导言部门，初步说明了类同比拟性妥协句式的概念，提出了该句式下辖次类的尺度并勾画了研究的根本框架，简述了研究办法、相干研究情形和本专题的研究意义。这一部门做的是解题定位的任务。第二章是语形剖析，从小句联络组分解复句格局的角度，法语论文范文，不雅察了联系关系词语、分句主语、分句宾语等根本句法成份，归结出对称性、趋整性、趋简性等三个句法构造的特色，法语论文网站，该部门做的是分类定形的任务。第三章是语义剖析，树立起类同比拟性妥协量级，确立了类同比拟性妥协关系和对峙比拟性妥协关系的语义内在，并从选择性、转机性的角度把类同比拟性妥协句式分为妥协选择式和妥协转机式。这一部门做的是分类定性的任务。第四章是格局辨异，将妥协选择式“不是p，也是q”跟同义格局“不是p，就是q”“与其p，不如q”停止了鉴别比拟，将妥协转机式“x不是p，也是p”跟相干格局“x是x，p是p”停止了对峙比拟，更深刻地挖掘了类同比拟性妥协句式“妥协求同”的语义语用特色，即其语意重点在于类同而不在于差别，其语用目标在于求同而不在于比拟。该部门做的是比拟验证的任务。第五章是思虑部门，从“也”字的意义、用法的角度不雅察，验证了妥协句式“不是p，也是q”的分类成绩，归结了类同比拟性妥协量级剖析法的根本特色，并从“也”字用法与妥协量级剖析法等角度思虑了其他相干复句格局的分类定性等成绩。二兑回【丁硕士学位论文wMASlllL’S THESIS一总之，本研究力争较好地理论一条从现实景象描述到实际办法归结的研究门路。 Abstract: Analogy in a part of the examination of the ancient Chinese sentence pattern of new invention "not p and Q" in a similar compromise sentence syntactic and semantic features. The research reality in the talk of the sentence as the basic, with complex sentence can be divided into three system actually, according to the small triangle research value to the language form and language, the language for the mind, puts forward and adopts "compromise order of magnitude analysis", class up to quasi compromise sentence syntactic and semantic features of more detailed description and attributed to and the confrontation comparison worries response sentence the same shape pattern. The first chapter is introduction department, preliminarily show similar compared to the concept of compromise sentence, presented the sentence under the jurisdiction of the scale and outlined the basic framework of the research, describes the research methods and coherent research situation and the topic research significance. This department does the task of solving the problem. The second chapter is the analysis of language form, small sentence liaison group decomposition of complex sentence pattern from the point of view, indecent examine the links between words, subject clause, object clause, fundamental syntactic constituents, attributed to a symmetry, tend to integration, trend of Jane three syntactic structure features, the Department is the setting of classification tasks. Chapter three is the semantic analysis, establish an intends to compromise in order, established a similar match confrontation and compromise relationship compromise between the internal semantic analogy, and from the angle of selectivity, turn the similar comparison compromise sentence points for compromise and compromise transfer type. This department is doing the task of classifying the nature. The fourth chapter is pattern of differentiation and compromise choice "not p, but also Q" with synonymous pattern "is not p is Q, and P, as Q" stop identification compared to compromise turnaround "x is not p and P" coherent pattern "x is x, P is p" stop the confrontation compared to more deeply excavates the similar comparison compromise sentence "compromise seeking the same" semantic and pragmatic characteristics, namely the semantic focus is similar to but not the difference, the pragmatic goal lies in seeking common ground and not in the match. The Department is doing the task of comparing the verification. The fifth chapter is the consideration department, from the point view of the meaning of "also" word, the use of the observations to verify the compromise sentence "not p, but also Q" classification performance, the author summed up similar comparison compromise order of magnitude analysis fundamental characteristics, and from the "is" the word usage and compromise order of magnitude analysis method angle consider other coherent sentence pattern classification and qualitative results. Two against the return of the wMASlllL 'S' THESIS in a word, this study and strive to better theory from a realistic picture description to the practical approach to the study of ways to sum up. 目录: |
