| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 本文试图以茅盾与天然主义的关系为切入点，探访中国社会主义实际主义实际的成长、递嬗。本论文彩取层层递进的措施，前三部门着重于原始资料的发掘，后两部门则着重于对详细景象的略论。就全体结构而言，论文阐述重点在第3、四部门。本论文详细构架以下引言，也等于第一部门考核茅盾与天然主义的关系。文论上，茅盾环绕着天然主义的动摇是依据取与舍的现实须要而发生的，俄语论文网站，其立场可以分为六个分歧阶段创作上，俄语论文范文，茅盾与天然主义的关系是“成也萧何，败也萧何”。第二部门对于茅盾杂乱精湛的文论加以归纳综合梳理。析出茅盾分歧时代占主流位置的文论和供给给社会主义实际主义接收的因子；重点论述法国天然主义和俄国实际主义对于茅盾文论的作用和茅盾自己对此的说法经由过程将茅盾文论与周扬文论和前期发明社太阳社文论的比拟得出俄国实际主义只是对茅盾文论渗入渗出的结论。第三部门寻觅茅盾文论中和批驳理论中天然主义的陈迹。虽然茅盾30年月今后一向不愿认可天然主义对他的作用，然则我们仍可以或许发明他与左拉的浩瀚类似点。第四部门剖析茅盾文论中天然主义与主流社会主义实际主义之间的裂隙。以茅盾文论三次升沉为不雅照点重视裂隙的存在，从天然主义被妖魔化和茅盾的“落伍焦炙”两方面来研讨裂隙的成因，最初存眷裂隙若何被抹平。结语召唤对于茅盾以天然主义为基石的社会主义实际主义文论加倍深刻的研究，兼论天然主义与中国社会主义实际主义关系。 Abstract: This paper tries to from the perspective of the relationship between Mao Dun and natural doctrine and visit China socialist realism the actual growth and evolutional. This paper take the progressive layers, the top three departments focus on exploring the original data, after the two part focuses on the detailed scene. The whole structure, the paper focuses on the third and the four department. This paper detailed framework below introduction, relationship is equal to the first department assessment and natural Mao Dun doctrine. The theory, Mao Dun around the doctrine of natural shaking is according to the reality of the give and take of the need and the occurrence of, its position can be divided into six different stages of creation, the relationship between Mao Dun and natural doctrine is "into also Xiao He, be defeated also Xiao He". The second departments on Mao Dun messy exquisite literary theory summarized combing. Precipitation of Mao Dun at different times for position of the mainstream literary theory and supply to receive the socialist realism factor; focuses on French naturism and Russian realism about Mao Dun literary theory and the influence of Mao Dun's own this argument through the theory of Mao Dun literary theory and week Yangwen on and prophase invention agency sun society the compare Russian realism is of Mao Dun literary theory conclusion of infiltration. The third sector in search of Mao Dun's literary theory and criticism in the past natural theory. Although Mao Dun 30 years in the future have been reluctant to recognition of the influence of his natural doctrine, but we still can invent he and Zola's vast similar point. The fourth part analysis between Mao Dun literary naturalism and mainstream socialist realism fissures. By Mao Dun literature on three heave for indecent point attention fissure existence, be demonized and Mao Dun's "outdated Jiaozhi" to investigate the fracture causes from the doctrine of natural initial deposit dependents fracture how to be smooth. The call of Mao Dun socialist realism to the natural doctrine as the cornerstone of the theory to further research, relationship between naturalism and Chinese socialist realism. 目录: 内容摘要 4-5 Abstract 5 一、引言：欲说还休：自然主义与茅盾 8-12 1.茅盾围绕自然主义的波动：取与舍 9-10 2.茅盾早期倡导的自然主义定性：真实、客观、科学 10-12 二、芜杂精深：茅盾文论概述 12-20 1.形成：“城头变换大王旗” 12-13 (1) 表象主义 12 (2) 新浪漫主义 12-13 2.对峙：法国自然主义与俄国现实主义 13-17 (1) 法国自然主义的作用 13-14 (2) 俄国现实主义的作用 14-17 ① 理想性 16-17 ② 功利性 17 3.自述：接纳还是拒绝? 17-20 (1) 对法国自然主义作用的说法 17-18 (2) 对俄国现实主义作用的说法 18-20 三、遗踪犹在：茅盾文论中和批评实践中自然主义的痕迹 20-36 1.以左拉为参照：法国自然主义大师理解的真义 20-24 2.茅盾的学与创：中国自然主义传人留下的痕迹 24-36 四、潜滋暗长：茅盾文论中自然主义与社会主义现实主义的裂隙 36-51 1.裂隙之存在：以茅盾文论三次起伏为观照点 36-42 (1) 裂隙存在的可能性 36 (2) 自然主义痕迹与所倡导的主流社会主义现实主义之间的裂隙 36-41 ① “百花时期”与之后几年对比 37-39 ② 1960—1962年期间与1964年批判开始之后的对比 39-40 ③ 文革时期与新时期对比 40-41 (3) 自然主义痕迹与茅盾的否认态度间的裂隙 41-42 2.存在之缘由：自然主义被妖魔化和茅盾的“落后焦虑” 42-48 (1) 自然主义被妖魔化 42-44 (2) 茅盾的“落后焦虑” 44-48 ① 心理学上的“焦虑” 44-45 ② “落后焦虑” 45-46 ③ 茅盾为什么会产生落后焦虑? 46-48 3.裂隙之抹平：调和矛盾、称病逃避、自白心迹、亲身实践 48-51 五、结语 51-56 1.替茅盾文论叫屈： “三驾马车”之一茅盾文论的相对冷清 51-53 2.为自然主义招魂：兼论自然主义与中国社会主义现实主义关系 53-56 (1) 共生：“预热”式启蒙，“渗透”性吸纳 53-54 (2) 排斥：时势的断然抉择，前者的黯然退场 54-56 参考文献 56-62 一、作品 56-58 A 探讨作品 56-58 B 茅盾作品 58 二、论文 58-62 |
