摘要:(摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制,俄语专业论文,俄语论文题目,下载原文正常,内容请直接查看目录。) 伯纳德·马拉默德(1914-1986)是现代美国最卓著的犹太作家之一。他善于在著作顶用个体特别的事例来反应具有广泛个性的内容。他的著作描写的平日都是在同化世界中刻苦并生长着的通俗犹太人。《基辅怨》(1966)被以为是马拉默德最优良的小说,在1967年取得美国国度图书奖和普利策奖。小说讲述的是一个贫苦的修配工雅科夫·鲍克被诬陷出于宗教缘由谋杀了一个基督徒男孩,在狱中赓续地与各类各样的苦楚、熬煎及不公平作奋斗的进程。以往的研究年夜多存眷《基辅怨》中人物的犹太性、受难、精力生长、原型、汗青的,而本文试图在福柯权利实际视角下研讨小说中规训权利的运转机制及沙俄统治下的人们,特别是主人公雅科夫对规训权利的对抗。福柯以为,规训权利是一种特别的权利技巧,旨在经由过程一系列的规训手腕和规训机构完成权利的一方对另外一方的掌握。但是,哪里有权利,哪里就有对抗。规训权利其实不是全能的,它注定会遭受各类各样的对抗。经由过程剖析《基辅怨》中俄国的规训技巧和本国人们对规训权利的对抗,本论文作者发明小说中的沙俄就是一个牢狱式的规训社会。在这个规训社会里,无所不在的权利掌握并改革着人们,以使他们“驯良”。然则,小说中的人物并没有完整屈从于这类规训,而是以各类措施停止着对抗。小说中雅科夫的窘境其实不单单是沙俄犹太人的窘境,也是世界上其他多数族裔的窘境。本文由五章构成。第一章扼要引见作家马拉默德及其著作,小说《基辅怨》及后人对《基辅怨》的研究,同时指出本文的框架构造。第二章重点阐述福柯的权利实际,也等于本文的实际框架。在扼要引见福柯的权利不雅后,将对规训技巧,“圆形牢狱”,牢狱实际及对权利的对抗停止具体说明。第三章重要剖析层级监督、标准化判决和检讨这三种规训技巧在小说中的沙俄是若何实行以便对人们停止“标准”和保持社会次序的。在剖析中,有关“圆形牢狱”和牢狱的实际也会恰当地交叉个中。在《基辅怨》中,人们都被限制在一个无所不在的监督和书写收集中,任何偏离或违背标准和司法的行动都邑遭到处分。第四章重要商量了雅科夫是若何对俄国的规训权利停止各类对抗的。带着一种不平从的精力,雅科夫违反俄公法学住在了一处犹太人禁居的处所。被捕入狱后,他其实不屈从于俄国政府的各种规训而是以各类措施与卑劣的情况和威胁迷惑做奋斗而且终究取得了精力上的觉悟和生长。个中,话语是他对抗的一种重要措施。另外,本论文还扼要阐述了小说中其别人对规训权利的对抗,进而论证了沙俄的规训权利其实不是无所不克不及的,它遭到来自各方面的对抗。第五章是对全文的归结总结,指出在《基辅怨》中,沙俄是一个随处渗入渗出着权利关系及对抗的牢狱式的规训社会。小说表达了马拉莫德对生涯在充满着权利关系的古代社会中人们的生计窘境的深切关怀。 Abstract: Bernard Malamud (1914-1986) is the most outstanding modern American Jewish writers. He is in the works with individual special cases to have extensive reaction characteristic content. His works are in the world on the growth and assimilation of hard popular jews. "Complaint of Kiev" (1966) is thought to be Malamud's most excellent novel, made in the 1967 National Book Award and the Pulitzer prize. The novel tells the story of a poor repair Borjakov Bowker was framed for religious reasons for the murder of a Christian boy, in prison is ceaseless and all kinds of suffering, torture and unfair for the struggle of the process. Previous studies of the eve of the save of characters in the Kiev resentment, attention to Jewish, suffering, growth energy, prototype and history. However, this paper attempts to discuss the novel in the disciplinary right of the operation mechanism and tsarist Russia under the rule of people in Foucault's power theory angle of view, especially the protagonist Jaco husband of disciplinary right against. Foucault thought that the discipline right is a kind of special right skills, to pass a series of discipline and discipline mechanism to complete the right wrist of a party to the other party of the master. However, where there is right, there is confrontation. In fact, the right discipline is not omnipotent, it is destined to suffer all kinds of confrontation. Through the analysis of the process of the Kiev indignation in Russia's disciplinary skills and his own people, the disciplinary right against, the author invented the tsarist Russia in the novel is a prison disciplinary society. In the disciplinary society, the right to reform and omnipresent people, to make them as "". However, the characters in the novel did not succumb to this kind of complete discipline, but by all kinds of methods to stop a fight. In the novel the dilemma of Yakov not only is the Russian Jewish dilemma, but also the majority of other ethnic groups in the world. This paper consists of five chapters. The first chapter briefly introduces the author Malamud and his novels, "complaint of Kiev" and the descendants of the "Kiev indignation" research, and points out that the framework presented in this paper. The second chapter focuses on Foucault's right, is equal to the actual framework of this article. In brief the Foucault right after the indecent, to discipline skills, "circular prison, prison and actual confrontation on the rights of the specific instructions to stop. In the third chapter, analysis of the level of supervision, the standard of judgment and review the three disciplinary techniques in the novel of Russia is how to implement in order to stop people from the "standard" and maintaining social order. In the analysis, the actual "circular prison and prison will cross the right. In the Kiev indignation ", people have been limited in a ubiquitous supervision and writing collection, any deviate or violate the standards of justice and the action cities by sanctions. The fourth chapter is to discuss important Yakov to Russia against the right to stop all kinds of discipline. With a rough energy from Russia in violation of public law, Yakov lived in a Jewish ban in place. After he was arrested, in fact not succumb to the Russian government's various discipline but by various methods and the confused situation and threat of dirty fighting and eventually achieved the consciousness and spiritual growth. Among them, the discourse is an important method against him. Also the paper also briefly describes the confrontation in his novels, the others on the disciplinary right, and demonstrates the disciplinary right of tsarist Russia in fact is not omnipotent, it was confrontation from various aspects. The fifth chapter of the full text are summarized. It is pointed out that in the Kiev indignation, Russia is a everywhere permeated with rights and against the prison disciplinary society. The novel Mara Maude expressed deep concern for the career in full rights in ancient society people's livelihood dilemma. 目录: |