As a communist authoritarian political transition country representatives of the two, China and Russia in the past 30 years of social transformation experience annotations and authoritarian countries have differences in the history of Europe and the United States the world the operation logic from the Almighty to. Differences in Europe and the United Kingdom media in regime and to identify the shapes established under the "growth" approach, after the evolution characteristics of Communist authoritarian state media is "transformation". Using the doctrine of new rail system, spread of the actual object of political economy and social activities, to literature research, case studies and comparative research methods, the study of the media between the two countries, China and Russia from 1978 to 2017 since the transformation method, and focus on the evaluation of the process of transition and the media of the two countries said the influence of various factors, such as master state, market and civil society and social activities, through the process of the study, the author wishes can not only may be more meticulous description of the Sino Russian preface transition track special discipline, is perhaps than quasi real recovery and all kinds of rights of identity in the process of the role of. The first chapter of this dissertation is to recall the Chinese and Russian media transformation approaches since 1978. The Russian media format and form before the transition compared to stop. Media of the Soviet Union in 1985 "underground" transformation of capital stock compared to the rich, the media format is center of vertical governance of pyramid hierarchical format, the message is the implementation of "party control of the media, the state-owned public, according to the planning economy set furnishings and equipment, media capital, Tan Tugao degree of Yigai, announced channels are highly with a" Sinian Nightwood messages in the form of "; China is based on Mao Zedong's news thought development" Sinian Nightwood message form ", with Soviet Union" Sinian Nightwood messages in the form of "the biggest differences in political activities in the media of dynamic. On the basis of the transformation of the media in both the crux of nodes and evolutionary path. In this paper, the Sino Russian media transformation divided into three times: (1) in the 1980s to identify the shapes upheavals era: 1978 Chinese media gradually from the understanding of the party shape to promote object, gradually to the ideological enlightenment role transition. The media since the "underground" to the non party; (2) beginning in early 1990, the two media can also start the market transition, the differences in the Russian Federation, after the media began to self media and public ownership, capital operation of the comprehensive trade, China media is the market self capital accumulation the transition; (3) since the mid 1990's beginning, the media of the two countries beginning the group, but there is a real difference, the Russian media in the financial industry is oligopoly under the master, Chinese regional administrative body strength under control; (4) since 2000, the Russian media to the country in Putin the government, Chinese media is the "beginning to mainstream transition. The second chapter is on the premise of the initial transformation of the media of the two countries are compared, comparison from five aspects: the first is the transformation of the main open, China media transformation of the "incremental growth" is the main characteristic of the transformation of the resolution edge and non focus of the emerging media, Russia has experienced three mainstream media "stock reshuffle" system level differences; second, the transformation of media, China media transformation showed more dexterity, irregular system exception characteristics, the Russian media is mostly through the process of formal justice and presidential decree implementation; third, the economic situation of different media face, China media is competition country monopoly and regional evacuation the "birdcage economy", the Russian media in the face of "shock therapy" before the financial industry group "oligarch economy"; fourth, grasp the political analogy, Chinese media has always been in "Party media" the unit under the master, Russia at the beginning of the independent, because "the authorities competent" scene, forming a oligopoly to the media master; 5, on both sides of the ideological capital differences, the mid 1980s "underground" for the Soviet / Russian media training a high degree of political intervention in energy and the opposition role, Chinese media faced missing shape hegemony situation awareness. In the third chapter, starting from the comparison countries, media relations, the media in the transformation of the internal control aspects, important differences between the media of both countries is: China's central government is itself the ruling philosophy of media regulation basis, and the Soviet / Russian is biased to the media to stop rail construction of, but right outside the country of differentiation and game also told the media transformation formed implications and opportunities. Specifically, 1980s after reform and opening-up, the media of the two countries face shape game situation, Chinese politics "in the right alliance" and the Soviet Union "plain near the main conservative" control knowledge shape right decision theory of media of the two countries to differences; in the 1990s to center of Chinese authorities to the media requests from publicizing knowledge into the shape of the legitimate authorities of achievements and the benefits of the central and local respectively media off-site surveillance and other innovation offerred an opportunity. Russian media, under the control of the oligopoly, has become the subject of political elections and struggle; after 2000, the Chinese authorities are in favor of the protection of social stability, local authorities 目录: |
