| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 刑事守法性无疑是法治国度刑法中一个主要的症结词，它是罪刑法定准绳在犯法概念中的表现，俄语论文题目，意味着行动组成犯法的要件只能由刑事司法划定。其为平易近众指出了一个不陷于罪的行为偏向。但前苏联强调犯法的阶层属性，乃至刑法虚无主义思惟舒展，刑事守法性掉去了生计的泥土。俄罗斯《刑法典》对犯法具有刑事守法性特点予以了认可。但其只是对刑事守法性在法治国度中贯彻罪刑法定准绳及保证人权的功效和价值有了初步的熟悉。克隆于前苏联刑法的我国刑事守法性实际，同俄罗斯的刑事守法性实际根本类似，其概念空泛、内容穷困、功效之单一。而且在我国刑法实际中，俄语毕业论文，行动具有社会伤害性、行动具有刑事守法性和行动相符犯法组成三位一体。这不只混淆了“现实”和“价值”的差别，也疏忽了刑法评价进程中由表及里、由情势到本质的条理性。这类评价形式晦气于经由过程法式限制国度科罚权的动员，晦气于更好的保证人权。本文将在比拟苏联、俄罗斯和我国刑事守法性实际的基本上，指出应若何将刑事守法性实际回归转义，和应若何从新构建一套新的以刑事守法性为焦点的实际系统。 Abstract: Criminal law is a major problem in the rule of law country criminal law, it is the legal principle of the crime in the concept of performance, means that the elements of the crime of action can only be defined by the criminal justice. The public pointed out a tendency of not to be caught in the crime. But the former Soviet Union, emphasize the criminal class attribute, stretch and criminal law nihilism thought, criminal law fell to the livelihoods of the earth. The criminal code of Russia has been recognized by the criminal law. But it is only a preliminary understanding of the effectiveness and value of criminal law abiding in the rule of law in the country to implement the principle of legality and ensure the effectiveness and value of human rights. Cloning in the former Soviet Union criminal law of our country criminal law of reality, with Russia's criminal law actually similar, the concept of vague, poor content, effect of single. And in the criminal law of our country, action has the social harm, the action has the criminal law to obey the law and the action is consistent with the crime to constitute the trinity. This not only confuses the difference between "reality" and "value", also ignored the evaluation of criminal law in the process from the outside to the inside, by the situation to clarity of the essence. This kind of evaluation form is not conducive to the French nation through the process of limiting the right of the penalty of the mobilization, guarantee of human rights is not conducive to the better. In this paper, in comparison to the Soviet Union, Russia and China's criminal law of actual basically. It is pointed out that how should the criminal law of the actual return to escape, and how should the newly constructed a new in criminal law is the focus of the actual system. 目录: 摘要 2-3 Abstract 3 引言 6-7 一、刑事违法性理论之源--违法性论 7-15 （一） 违法性的本质 7-11 1. 形式的违法性和实质的违法性 8-9 2. 客观的违法性和主观的违法性 9-10 3. 结果无价值和行为无价值 10-11 （二） 违法性的程度 11-13 （三） 违法性的要素 13-15 1. 人的违法要素 13 2. 客观的违法要素与主观的违法要素 13-15 二、前苏联刑事违法性理论的流变 15-19 （一） 犯罪的阶级属性下的刑事违法性理论 15-16 （二） 前苏联对刑事违法性理论的改造 16-19 1. 强调犯罪概念的阶级性，用社会危害性概念取代实质的违法性 16-17 2. 以刑事违法性取代形式违法性，并赋予其主客观相统一的内涵 17-19 三、俄罗斯刑事违法性理论的有限复归 19-23 （一） 俄罗斯刑法理论对刑事违法性理论的反思 19-21 （二） 俄罗斯刑事违法性理论的基本内涵 21-23 四、对我国刑事违法性理论的评析 23-29 （一） 我国刑事违法性理论的概念及地位 23-27 1. 刑事违法性与社会危害性的关系 23-24 2. 刑事违法性与犯罪构成的关系 24-27 （二） 我国刑事违法性的功能 27-29 五、我国刑事违法性理论的重构 29-40 （一） 我国对俄罗斯刑事违法性理论的借鉴 29-32 1. 俄罗斯刑事违法性理论对我国的启示 29-31 2. 对俄罗斯刑事违法性理论借鉴的基础 31-32 （二） 刑事违法性概念的重构 32-33 1. 法益概念的导入 32 2. 形式的刑事违法性与实质的刑事违法性 32-33 （三） 刑事违法性是犯罪概念的唯一特征 33-35 （四） 刑事违法性两要件双层次评价机制的构建 35-40 1. 典型事实 35-36 2. 刑事违法性要件 36-40 结论 40-44 参考文献 44-46 在读期间论文清单 46-47 致谢 47-48 |
