| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，俄语论文网站，内容请直接查看目录。） 若何有用地掩护地盘资本，遏制地盘资本的损坏趋向，这简直是世界一切国度和地域政府的思虑。俄罗斯联邦在国度政治经济产生变更的进程中，赓续地增强了地盘资本掩护立法，构成了一整套地盘资本掩护司法轨制。深刻研究比拟，对我国的相干立法会有所启发和赞助。本文的研究目标是在周全总结分离引见中国、俄罗斯两国古代地盘资本掩护立法重要内容和经历展现两国古代地盘资本掩护立法过程的基本上，侧重对彼此的差别和特色，停止体系地剖析评述，并联合有关立法在理论中的后果和成绩，从保持可连续成长计谋的高度，提出学术看法和改良建议，以此探访周全构建具有中国特点的新社会主义地盘资本掩护司法系统的新思想和新构思，弥补我国在这一研究范畴的空白。本文研究的根本内容包含本文共分10 部门 第1 部门是引言，重要引见了研究配景、研究目标和意义、研究对象和规模、研究办法和思绪、研究立异与难点。第2 部门概述，重要对本文研究内容触及的一些根本概念、根本实际。第3 部门从中俄两国古代地盘资本掩护立法成长汗青动身，分离引见了两国古代地盘资本掩护立法的根本情形。第4 部门引见了中俄两国立法中确立的地盘资本掩护的根本准绳，对各自的立法特点停止了剖析评价。第5 部门引见了中俄两国中地盘资本掩护的立法中，构成的立法系统、司法系统，对各自的特点停止了剖析评价。第6 部门引见了中俄两国立法中构成的地盘资本掩护的根本内容，对各自的立法特点停止了剖析评价。第7 部门引见了中俄两国立法中确立的地盘资本掩护的体系体例，对各自的立法特点停止了剖析评价。第8 部门引见了中俄两国立法中确立的地盘资本掩护的监视和司法义务系统，对各自的立法特点停止了剖析评价。第9 部门是研究中俄两领土地资本掩护立法趋向和汗青自创。第10 部门结论。本文研究的办法重要有比拟法 所谓比拟法，在国外比拟法律家中有分歧的懂得，如英公法律家沃森以为它是一种法制史和法理学的研究。德国比拟法律家格罗斯费尔德则以为比拟法是一种文明。中国比拟法律家沈宗灵以为，俄语论文范文，简略地说，比拟法是对分歧国度(或特定地域)的司法轨制的比拟研究。重要采取了微观比拟与微不雅比拟、功效比拟与概念比拟、静态比拟与静态比拟三种比拟办法。微观比拟，是指分歧社会轨制司法作为一个全体的比拟，即指对中俄两国分歧政治、经济和社会轨制下完成地盘资本掩护立法的全体评价和比拟。微不雅比拟是指分歧司法概念、规矩、轨制以致部分法的比拟，即指对中俄两领土地资本掩护立法的汗青成长、根本准绳、重要内容、司法系统、司法监视、成长趋向等停止详细的评价和比拟。功效比拟是指“要从分歧司法的异同中发明分歧处理成绩的手腕”(沈宗灵，2003)，即指对中俄两领土地资本掩护立法中“分歧处理成绩的手腕”停止比拟研究，从而提出立法自创。概念比拟是指标准比拟或许立法比拟，即指对中俄两领土地资本掩护立法中根本概念、立法构造、立律例范等停止比拟研究，以进一步懂得两国各自的地盘资本掩护司法轨制。静态比拟，是指对普通特准时间、特定司法条则、司法内容的比拟，即指对中俄两领土地资本掩护立法中详细的司法条则、司法内容的差别停止的比拟。静态比拟是指对上述司法的发生、成长、实行、感化等成绩的比拟，即指对中俄两领土地资本掩护立法的汗青配景、 Abstract: How to effectively protect the land capital, to curb the trend of damage to the land capital, which is the world's all countries and regions of the government's thinking. The Russian Federation in the national political and economic produce changes in the process, continuously enhances the land resource protection legislation, form a complete set of land resources protection legal system. Profound research and comparison, the relevant legislation of our country will be inspired and sponsored. The goal of this research is in a comprehensive summary separation introduction China, Russian Chinese land resource protection legislation is an important content and experiences to show Chinese land resource protection legislation process basically, focusing on each other's differences and characteristic and system analysis are reviewed, and with the relevant legislation in the theoretical consequences and results, from keeping the height of the continuous development strategy proposed academic views and suggestions for improvement, in order to visit comprehensive construction with Chinese characteristics socialism new land resources protection legal system of new ideas and new concepts, to make up for gaps in the research field of our country. The purpose of this paper is to study the basic content of this paper contains is divided into 10 departments Part 1 is the introduction, introduces the research background, the research goal and the significance, the research object and scope, research methods and ideas, research innovation and difficulty. The second part is an overview, it is important to study the content of this paper to touch some of the fundamental concepts, the actual. The third sector from the ancient land capital of China and Russia to cover the history of the development of legislation to start, the separation of the two countries to introduce the basic situation of the protection of the ancient land capital legislation. The fourth section introduces the basic principles of the establishment of the land capital protection in the legislation of China and Russia, and analyzes the characteristics of the respective legislation. The fifth section introduces the legislative system and the judicial system of China and Russia, which constitute the legislative system and judicial system. The sixth section introduces the basic content of the land capital shield which is formed in the legislation of China and Russia. The seventh section describes the establishment of Sino Russian legislation in the system of land capital protection system, the characteristics of their respective legislation to stop the analysis and evaluation. The eighth section describes the establishment of the Sino Russian legislation to protect the land cover of the monitoring and judicial system, the characteristics of their respective legislation to stop the analysis and evaluation. The ninth section is the study of the two leading land capital of China and Russia to cover the legislative trend and historical. Tenth sector conclusions. The purpose of this paper is to study the important analogy method the so-called analogy method and abroad compared jurists have different understand, such as British jurist Watson thinks it is a kind of legal system history and jurisprudence research. The German jurist Grossfeld thinks analogy analogy method is a kind of civilization. China compare jurist Shen zongling thinks, simply saying, analogy method is comparative research of different countries (or specific region) judicial rail system. It is important to adopt three methods, which are micro analogy, micro comparison, efficacy comparison and concept comparison, static and static comparison. Micro analogy refers to the differences in social system of justice as a whole of the comparison, that refers to the political, economic and social system of China and Russia to complete the full evaluation and comparison of land capital shield legislation. Micro indecent analogy refers to the differences of concept of justice, rules, rail system so that a portion of the method of analogy, referring to Russian territory capital protection legislation development history, basic principles, important content, judicial system, judicial supervision, development trends and other stop detailed evaluation and comparison. The effect to compare means "to from differences in different judicial invention divergence treatment results of wrist" (Shen zongling, 2003), refers to on Russian territory capital protection legislation "divergence treatment results of wrist" stop comparative study, so as to bring forward legislation created. Concept of analogy is refers to the standards comparable perhaps legislation comparison, refers to the legislation of Russian territory capital cover basic concepts, structure of the legislation, statutes fan and conduct comparative studies to further understand their respective land resources protection legal system. Than the quasi-static, is refers to the comparison of ordinary authorized time, specific judicial strip, the judicial content, refers to the stop, the judicial content to in detailed judicial legislation of Russian territory capital to cover the difference comparison. Static analogy refers to the occurrence, growth, implementation, probation and other achievements of the above comparison, that refers to the two leading land capital of China and Russia to cover the historical background of the legislation, 目录: |
