| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 北年夜西洋条约组织成立于1949年，是二战停止后美国结合西欧年夜国配合树立的国际军事组织。苏联及东欧社会主义国度为反抗北约于1955年树立华约组织，自此构成两年夜国际军事组织的暗斗友好态势。1991韶华约闭幕，暗斗停止，北约在新的国际情势下持续追求成长。美国经由过程扩展北约的政治本能机能及实行东扩筹划等计谋手腕，持续掌握欧洲和主导世界，保护其全球霸权位置。北约东扩严重伤害了俄罗斯的国度平安好处，跟着北约地舆规模和政治本能机能的扩展和介入国际事务水平的加深，俄北关系的成长变更已不再是地域性成绩。本文对俄北关系成长过程停止具体梳理，以曩昔二十年俄罗斯与北约关系的汗青事宜为根据，深入剖析了俄北关系的动因和特色；经由过程比较俄罗斯三届引导人对北约政策的演化，俄语论文，对俄北关系的将来成长做出感性断定；最初周全总结俄北关系发生的作用，为中国的成长和对外政策的制订供给自创。本文共分5章。第1章回想叶利钦和普京两个时代的俄北关系。叶利钦在朝之初俄北关系阅历了一段蜜月时代，但两边在北约东扩成绩上逐步构成不合和抵触，在阅历一段奋斗时代后，于1997年签订“根本文件”，俄北关系进入顺应阶段。科索沃战斗的迸发使叶利钦在朝末期的俄北关系敏捷好转。普京下台后肯定在朝目的并调剂对外政策，改良同东方国度关系，积极与北约接触，树立北约—俄罗斯理事会。在“9·11”事宜产生的契机下同北约睁开普遍协作。在叶利钦和普京的管理下俄罗斯综合国力明显晋升，但在这两个时代分离完成的两轮北约东扩筹划使俄罗斯的地缘计谋空间遭到严重挤压。第2章总结了梅德韦杰夫时代俄北关系的成长变更。梅德韦杰夫下台后产生俄格抵触事宜，俄北关系中止近一年时光。跟着全球化过程加深，非传统平安成绩位置上升增进了俄罗斯与北约的协作。在新时代“北约计谋新概念”推出后，俄罗斯与北约恢复接触。反导成绩的进一步成长是梅德韦杰夫时代俄北关系的核心成绩，两边在反恐等非传统平安范畴持续增强协作。本文在第3章中将俄北关系的动因总结为四点，分离是俄美关系的主导身分、北约身分、俄罗斯身分和内部情况身分。起首，北约改变本能机能及制订政策由美国主导，俄北关系的成长本质是以俄美关系变更为导向的。其次，北约政治本能机能扩展和北约东扩都是俄北关系变更的内涵作用身分。第三，俄罗斯对外政策的制订和与北约关系成长偏向受国度实力和成长须要限制。第四，内部身分作用俄北关系的成长偏向，个中最重要为恐惧主义和全球经济危机的作用。联合对俄北关系的汗青回想和对双边关系成长动因的深入剖析，本文第4章对俄北关系的特色停止了归结。起首，俄北关系最重要特色是构造性抵触的存在，重要指严重的互信缺掉招致的平安窘境。其次，俄罗斯与北约实力的不屈衡招致了双边关系的纰谬称性，北约一贯处于主导位置而俄罗斯处于主动位置。第三，俄语论文范文，汗青经历注解，俄北关系受制身分颇多，招致其具有不稳固性。最初，俄罗斯与北约前后树立的一些协作机制起到了稳定关系和扩展协作的感化，但两边基本抵触并未获得有用处理，俄罗斯与北约的协作机制具有必定的意味性。本文在第5章对俄罗斯三届引导人对北约的政策停止比较剖析，进而对俄北关系将来做出客不雅的猜测。别的，对俄北关系的深远作用也作出感性的剖析和总结，并得出对于我国对外政策制订和国度成长偏向的启发。 Abstract: North Atlantic Treaty Organization was established in 1949, is the United States after the end of World War II, the United States and the United States to establish the international military organization. In Soviet Union and Eastern European socialist countries against NATO in 1955, establishing the Warsaw Pact. Since then, constitute two of the eve of the international military organization infighting friendly trend. 1991 the closing of Shaoguan, stop the infighting in the new international situation, NATO continues to pursue growth. United States through expanded NATO's political function and implement expansion planning strategy wrist and continued mastery Europe and dominate the world, to protect its global hegemony position. NATO's eastward expansion has severely hurt Russia's national security interests, followed by NATO's geographical scale and political instinct function expansion and involvement in international affairs level deepening, change of the growth of relations between Russia and the north is no longer regional results. In this paper, the growth process of the Russian North relations is analyzed, and the reasons and characteristics of the relationship between Russia and NATO in the past twenty years are analyzed. Through the comparison of the evolution of NATO's policy and the future development of Russian North China, we have a comprehensive summary of the impact of the Russian North relations, and provide a reference for the development of China's growth and foreign policy. This paper is divided into 5 chapters. The first chapter is about the relationship between Yeltsin and Putin in two days. Yeltsin's moving in the beginning of the Russia NATO relations experienced a period of honeymoon era, but on both sides of the NATO's eastward expansion grades gradually formed disagreement and conflict, in experience a struggle era in 1997 signed "file", relations between Russia and North into compliance stage. Kosovo fighting to make Yeltsin in the end of the Russian North relations agility. Putin after stepping down to the purpose and the adjustment of foreign policy, improve the relationship with the East, and actively contact with NATO, establish NATO - Russia council. In the "11 - 9" issue of the opportunity to open universal cooperation with nato. Under the management of Yeltsin and Putin's Russia's comprehensive national strength has obvious promotion, but in times of the two separation completed two rounds of NATO's eastward expansion planning to make Russia's geo strategic space has been seriously squeezed. The second chapter summarizes the development of the relationship between Russia and the north of the Medvedev era. Medvedev stepped down after the Georgian conflict matters, suspension of the Russian North relations nearly a year of time. Along with the globalization process, the position of the non traditional security and the promotion of the position of Russia and NATO cooperation. In the new era, the new concept of NATO strategy, Russia and NATO resume contact. Further growth of the anti missile results is the core of the relationship between Russia and the north of the Medvedev era, both sides in the war on terrorism and other non-traditional security areas continue to enhance collaboration. This paper in the chapter 3 will be Russia NATO relations agent summarized as four points, separation is the dominant status of relations between Russia and the United States, NATO identity, Russian identity and internal situation of identity. First and foremost, NATO change instinct function and formulate policy led by the United States, the growth nature of relations between Russia and north is to relations between Russia and the United States change oriented. Secondly, NATO's political function expansion and the expansion of NATO is to change the connotation of the Russian North relations impact. Third, the development of Russia's foreign policy and the growth of the relationship between NATO and the growth of the country's strength and growth needs to be limited. Fourth, the internal factors affect the growth of the Russian North relations, which is the most important factor for the fear and the global economic crisis. The history of the relationship between Russia and the United Russia and the development of bilateral relations, in-depth analysis of the causes of the fourth chapter of the characteristics of the Russian North relations. First of all, the most important feature of the Russian North relations is the existence of structural conflict, the important means of serious mutual trust and the lack of security dilemma caused by. Secondly, the strength of Russia and NATO imbalance caused the bilateral relations of PI paradox says of, NATO has always been in the leading position and Russia in a passive position. Third, the historical experience of the Russian North relations are subject to a lot of factors, which lead to its instability. Initially, some cooperation mechanisms between Russia and NATO have played a role in the stability and expansion of cooperation, but the basic contradiction between the two sides did not get useful, Russia and NATO cooperation mechanism has a certain meaning. This article in the fifth chapter of Russia's three guide to NATO's policy to stop comparison analysis, and then to the Russian North relations in the future to make the guest's guess. In addition, the profound influence of the relationship between Russia and the North has made a sensible analysis and summary, and draw a conclusion on the development of China's foreign policy and national growth bias. 目录: |
