| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 本文拔取了四位美国俄裔俄罗斯成绩专家作为研究对象,分离是美国尼克松中间主任迪米特里·塞姆斯(Dimitri Simes)、美国公司研究所俄罗斯研究部主任利昂·阿伦(Leon Aron)、美国传统基金会戴维斯国际成绩研究院研究员亚里尔·科恩(Ariel Cohen)和美国华盛顿世界平安研究所高等研究员尼古拉·兹洛宾(Nikolai Zlobin),经由过程研究四位俄裔学者就普京时代的俄罗斯(2000-2017)所地下揭橥的文献资料,进而总结剖析俄裔学者研究俄罗斯的思惟特点。起首,几位俄裔学者简直对普京每次的改造办法都赐与批驳,以为是对平易近主政治的损坏,同时也指出普京改造使得俄罗斯加倍强盛,博得了俄罗斯平易近众的支撑；其次,几位俄裔学者将普京的交际懂得为一种对现有世界次序不满,妄图在前苏联国度间坚持传统作用力的交际妄图,他们以为普京误导了俄罗斯的国度好处和交际政策；第三,从几位俄裔学者给布什当局的政策建议来看,一方面,建议布什当局就配合好处与俄罗斯协作,如反恐、防分散等；另外一方面,建议布什当局郑重斟酌俄罗斯外交交际走向和美国对俄政策的联系关系。总之,几位俄裔学者以为幻想的美国对俄政接应该统筹美国好处需乞降交际准绳。在东方俄罗斯研究办法的谱系中,几位俄裔学者的不雅点较为折衷。与那些极端左翼和反俄学者的意见分歧,几位俄裔学者研究俄罗斯时有必定的积极性,例如,在批驳普京时代俄罗斯政治成长的同时,也客不雅地指出俄罗斯平易近众的立场；别的,请求美国当局对俄罗斯的外交交际施加存眷,但同时其实不赞同因为过度推动平易近主和限制俄罗斯的交际而障碍美俄协作。不外,受研究者配景等身分的限制,同绝年夜多半美国粹者一样,几位俄裔学者没可以或许熟悉到普京时代俄罗斯的年夜国交际和近邻交际的诉求具有必定的公道性,这是俄裔学者研究俄罗斯成绩所难以解脱的局限。 Abstract: This paper selects four Russian born American Russian experts as the research object, separation is Richard Nixon, American director of the centre for Dimitri Symes Dimitri SiMES,), the United States Enterprise Research Institute of the Russian Research Department Director Leon Aron (Leon Aron, the heritage foundation, Davis international achievements of Research Institute of research Ariel Cohen (Ariel Cohen) and Washington world peace study the advanced research member Nicola Zlobin (Nikolai Zlobin), through the discussion on the four Russian American scholars under the Putin Era of Russia (2000-2017) to expose published literature data, and then summarize the analysis of ideological characteristics of Russian American scholars to discuss Russia. First of all, several Russian scholars simply to Putin each transformation approach gives criticism, thought is damage to democratic politics, but also makes the transformation of Russian double strong Putin pointed out that Russia won public support; secondly, several Russian scholars will understand Putin as a kind of communication the existing world order discontent, to adhere to the traditional communication to influence in the former Soviet Union countries, they think that Putin misled the Russian national interests and foreign policy; third, from several Russian scholars to the Bush administration's policy recommendations to see, on the one hand, the Bush administration will cooperate with good advice cooperation with Russia, such as terrorism, anti dispersion; on the other hand, the authorities advised Bush to seriously study the Russian foreign communication and relationship to American policy towards russia. In conclusion, several Russian scholars believed that the fantasy of the United States to Russia policy should co-ordinate the benefits of demand and communicative principles. In the eastern Russian research approach of the spectrum, several Russian scholars point of view is more eclectic. And differences of opinion between those extreme left-wing and anti Russian scholars, several Russian American scholars to discuss Russia has certain positive, for example, in refuting the Putin Era Russian political development at the same time, also guest indecent pointed out Russia's public position; in addition, the request of the United States when the Bureau of Russian diplomatic communication applied concern, but at the same time, in fact, do not agree with because of excessive promote democracy and Russian communication barriers between the United States and Russia cooperation. Nevertheless, research with the scene, such as identity constraints, with the majority most American scholars, several Russian born scholars can not may be familiar with a certain degree of rationality to Putin Russia big country communication and nearest neighbor communication demands. This is Russian American scholars to discuss Russia performance are difficult to get rid of the limitations. 目录: |
