越南国会质询制度探讨Inquiry system of Vietnam Congress 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 近几年来，越北国会赓续改革并进步本身的运动效力以便真正成为代表国民志愿和意志的国度最高权利机关。进步国会运动质量的办法之一，是进步国会的质询及其质询回答运动的后果和效率，使当局对国会和国民大众累赘本身的国度治理义务。从此实情动身，为了改造对于质询及其质询回答的流程和手续，并完美相干司法划定，质询及其质询回答的研究今朝成为学术界最为存眷的热门。但是活着界上，质询运动虽有绝对悠长的汗青但对于质询运动的迷信基本、实际办法和司法标准文件还未获得充足研究。《越北国会质询轨制研究》论文重要集中评价质询运动的现状，由此对司法学例提出改良办法，越语论文范文，以便在越北国会及其国会机构运动的框架下完美对于国会代表质询和被质询主体的质询回答的司法系统。本文还研究了越南司法文件中对于质询运动的律例系统现状，指出其存在的缺点，由此对证询及其质询回答的司法系统提出改良办法和建议。本文构造除绪论、结论和参考文献目次的外，本论文包还包含以下四年夜根本部门：第一部门：越北国会质询轨制的概述；第二部门：越北国会质询轨制的情势与运转措施；第三部门：越北国会质询轨制现状存在的成绩；第四部门：完美越北国会质询轨制司法系统的办法和建议。 Abstract: In recent years, the north will continuously reform and progress of campaign effectiveness to truly become a representative national volunteer and the will of the country's highest authority. One of the ways to advance the quality of the exercise of the Congress is to advance the question and answer the question and the efficiency of the exercise of the Congress, and to make the authority of the government to control the obligations of the Congress and the public. From the truth, in order to transform the process and procedures on the question and answer questions and procedures, and perfect the relevant judicial delineation, the question and answer questions to answer the academic world is currently the most popular. But in the world, there is an absolute long history of inquiry movement, but there is not enough research on the scientific basis, practical methods and the judicial standard of the question movement. The the North would challenge the rail system research "the centralized evaluation question the motion status, thus the judicial rules propose improvement measures to in the north will and congressional bodies movement framework perfect a congressional inquiry and question answer the main questions of the judicial system. This thesis also studies the Vietnam judicial documents in a question statutes system present situation, and points out that the existing shortcomings, this syndrome inquiry and question answer the judicial system put forward improvement measures and suggestions. Constructed in this paper except the introduction, conclusion and reference table of contents, the package also contains the following four basic departments: First Department: the North would challenge the overview of the rail system; Second Department: the North would challenge the rail of the situation and operation method; the third sector: the North Congress inquiry results track the status quo of the; the four departments: the more perfect the Northland will question the judicial system of rail measures and suggestions. 目录: 摘要 4-5 ABSTRACT 5-6 绪论 9-11 0.1 探讨背景 9 0.2 探讨目的 9-10 0.3 探讨内容 10 0.4 本文探讨的措施 10-11 第一章 越南国会质询制度概述 11-21 1.1 质询的概念、目的及后果 11-14 1.1.1 质询的概念 11-12 1.1.2 质询的目的 12-13 1.1.3 质询的后果 13-14 1.2 质询的特点 14-15 1.3 质询的功能 15-16 1.4 相关国家质询制度的解释 16-21 第二章 越南国会质询制度概况 21-29 2.1 质询和质询答复法规的概况 21-23 2.2 国会会议期间的质询规程 23-24 2.3 质询活动的组织调度工作 24-25 2.4 颁布质询活动的简要报告和议决 25 2.5 国会专业委员会的听证--质询活动的辅助形式 25-29 2.5.1 听证的概念 26 2.5.2 听证的形式 26-27 2.5.3 越南听证活动的实践 27-29 第三章 越南国会质询制度存在的问题 29-34 3.1 质询及质询答复现行规程存在的问题 29-30 3.2 质询实施中的问题 30-31 3.3 质询答复活动中的问题 31-32 3.4 质询活动的法学法规中存在的问题 32-34 第四章 越南国会质询制度的法学完善 34-48 4.1 对于完善质询法学体系的各种基本观点 34-37 4.2 对于在国会常务委员会会议上提出质询的问题的确定 37-38 4.3 在宪法中明确保障和尊重国会代表质询权规定 38-39 4.4 国会对于质询的决议 39-40 4.5 保障质询工作效率的法规方法 40-45 4.6 完善质询法学规定的立法建议 45-48 结论 48-49 参考文献 49-52 致谢 52 |
