柬埔寨—泰国柏威夏古寺争端探讨Kampuchea - Thailand on the Preah Vihear Temple dispute 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，泰语毕业论文，下载原文正常，泰语论文网站，内容请直接查看目录。） 柬埔寨和泰国之间有着难解的汗青恩仇。最近几年来,位于两国界限的柏威夏古寺,成为两国国土争端和抵触的核心。柬泰因柏威夏古寺的争端由来已久,长达数十年,而发生的争端已稀有十年之久。海牙国际法庭于1962年对柏威夏停止判决,以为该古寺归柬埔寨方面一切,由此激发泰国方面的激烈不满,随后环绕着古寺的争端成绩,接连赓续,火种由此埋下。柏威夏寺争端成绩异常庞杂,它缘起于殖平易近时期留下的界限成绩,个中既有文明汗青和地缘政治身分,又有国际法庭判决埋下的诱因,还搀杂着浓厚的平易近族主义情结等身分。柏威夏寺所处的奇特地形和柬泰两国在汗青上的纠葛等身分,形成了两边在该地域争真个庞杂化。从汗青下去说,泰国和柬埔寨是中南半岛上两个陈旧的国度。从地舆地位下去看,柏威夏寺正利益于柬埔寨和泰国边疆的计谋制高点上,站在古寺之上可以俯瞰柬埔寨北部平原。柬泰两国在汗青上都曾传播鼓吹对柏威夏寺所属区域具有主权。1962年海牙国际法庭裁定柬埔寨胜诉,泰国在接收判决以后撤回了部队,然则又揭橥声明,一旦有新的证据,将保存发出古寺的权力。两国在柏威夏古寺邻近区域的界限线没有终究规定。2017年,柬埔寨开端准备停止柏威夏寺的世界遗产申报任务,这再度激发两国之间的争议。2017年7月7日,结合国教科文组织依据柬埔寨的请求将该寺列入《世界文明遗产名录》,激发泰国的不满。这在泰国惹起了一场轩然年夜波,招致泰国国际政治危机加重,泰、柬两国为此迸发了第二次争端,尔后两边胶葛赓续,乃至不吝年夜动干戈。在国际社会的干涉下,两边为紧张局面也停止了屡次会谈,但在国际政治等身分的作用下,两国特别是泰国在朝者不甘逞强,以避免被国际的否决派捉住政治痛处,或许遭到国际平易近众抗议的压力,从而使得柏威夏寺成绩与两国之间政治和交际角力的游戏慎密接洽在了一路。在各自国际政治身分的压力和作用下,两边在柏威夏古寺四周区域的主权成绩上各不相让,在处理门路等方面也看法各别,局势的成长愈来愈庞杂化。在能否须要国际社会参与和干涉的成绩上,柬泰两国有着分歧的意见。柬埔寨方面在面临与泰方最近几年来连续赓续地胶葛抵触进程中,建议东盟及结合国安理睬权势的参与。对此泰国方面则以为外借的参与两边处理争端杯水车薪。在其看来,双边谈判则是处理抵触的最好措施。2017年7月柬泰第二次柏威夏古寺争端迸发以来,因为赓续产生抵触,两国关系严重好转,也作用到了西北亚地域的平安情势,从而惹起了国际社会和很多国度的存眷。就东盟来讲,泰国和柬埔寨均为西北亚国度同盟的成员国,两国连续数年的国土胶葛和边疆抵触,对于西北亚地域的平安情势形成极端卑劣的作用,并且严重违反了《西北亚国度同盟宪章》的根本精力,是以东盟对柏威夏古寺争端事宜不克不及不去存眷。对于结合国安理睬来讲,柬泰两边在柏威夏古寺这一汗青遗留上去的成绩再次产生争端,两边也都是结合国的成员国,明显也有背于安理睬保持世界战争稳固、依附会谈来处理抵触的主旨。从参与的水平来看,西北亚国度同盟、结合国安理睬和结合国教科文组织都施展了较年夜的感化。整体来看,为停息这场由国土争端激发的边疆抵触,柬方采用的战略是乞助于结合国和东盟。安理睬也亮相支撑东盟为处理这一抵触所作出的积极尽力,并呼吁相干各方持续和东盟协作。同时,我们也不好看出,在柏威夏寺争端成绩上柬埔寨和泰国有着各自的盘算。柬埔寨当局愿望结合国安理睬参与处理两国边疆抵触,这是由于国际法院1962年把柏威夏寺判给了柬方,所以柬埔寨方面以为握有“王牌”,结合国参与只能对柬方有益。不外泰国仿佛也不逞强,泰国总理府谈话人巴尼坦已经表现,假如柬埔寨再次向结合国安理睬赞扬,泰国也将进一步供给说明。明显,泰柬两国环绕柏威夏寺的归属成绩的争论,处理起来并不是那末简略,还须要很长一段路要走。现实上,正如许多资深国际成绩专家所以为的,不管国际社会能否介入调处或许起到多年夜水平的感化,柬泰两国只要经由过程对话、互相让步能力找到处理成绩的前途。 Abstract: Have a difficult historical hatred between Kampuchea and Thailand. In recent years, the two countries in the Preah Vihear Temple boundaries, land disputes and conflict between the two countries became the core. The Cambodian Preah Vihear Temple Mattel dispute long-standing, for decades, disputes have been rare for ten years. The International Criminal Court in the Hague in 1962 on the Preah Vihear stopping and decision, that the Temple belongs to Cambodia all, which stimulate the Thailand's intense dissatisfaction, then surround the temple dispute scores, ceaselessly in succession, fire which planted. Temple of Preah Vihear dispute scores unusually complex, its origin in colonizing period left the boundaries of achievement, a civilization history and geopolitical factors, and buried in the International Court of incentives, but also mixed with strong plain near nationalism complex identity. Both sides in the region dispute complicated Preah Vihear Temple's unusual topography and Cambodia and Thailand in the history of the disputes and other factors. From the history, Thailand and Kampuchea are two old countries on the peninsula. From the geographical position, the Preah Vihear Temple positive benefit in Cambodia and Thailand border strategic commanding point, standing on top of the temple can overlooking the plains of northern Cambodia. Cambodia and Thailand in history have claimed sovereignty belongs to Preah Vihear temple. In 1962, the International Court of justice in the Hague ruled in favor of Cambodia, Thailand received after the decision to withdraw the troops, but also exposing a statement, once a new evidence, a temple of power will be saved. The two countries are not in the Preah Vihear temple areas adjacent to boundary line after all provisions. In 2017, Kampuchea began to prepare to stop the Preah Vihear temple world heritage application task, which re stimulate the disputes between the two countries. In July 7, 2017, the United Nations Educational, scientific and cultural organization, according to the request of Kampuchea will be included in the temple of the "World Heritage List", to stimulate the dissatisfaction of Thailand. This in Thailand caused a mighty big wave, lead Thailand international political crisis deepens, Thailand, Cambodia, China this burst of the second dispute. Thereafter on both sides of the glue Gregory ceaselessly and generous of the eve of the dynamic hostility. Under the interference of the international community, on both sides of tension stopped repeatedly talks, but under the influence of international politics and identity, both countries especially in Thailand unwilling to try to be brave, to avoid being international opposition to catch the political pain, perhaps by the plain of public protest of the pressure, so that the Preah Vihear Temple scores and between the two countries political and diplomatic wrestling game cheek by jowl approached in a way. Under pressure and influence their respective international political identity, both sides in the Preah Vihear Temple and the surrounding area sovereign achievement conflicting in processing opportunities also views individually, situation is getting more and more complicated. If you need the international community to participate in the performance and interference, Cambodia and Thailand have different opinions. Cambodia in the face with Thailand in recent years continuous ceaselessly glue Gregory conflict in the process, the proposed ASEAN and with the participation of national security ignore power. This Thailand is thought to lend in dealing with the dispute on both sides of an utterly inadequate measure. Bilateral negotiations, in their view, are the best way to deal with the conflict. Since the outbreak of the July 2017 Cambodian second Preah Vihear Temple dispute, because the ceaseless conflict, bilateral relations had deteriorated badly, also affect the northwest sub regional security situation, causing the international society and many countries of concern. On ASEAN, Thailand and Cambodia are for members of the Southeast Asian Nations Alliance, the two countries for several consecutive years of land glue Gregory and frontier conflict, about Southeast Asia regional security situation formed extremely mean effects, and a serious violation of the Charter of the Southeast Asian Nation Alliance of the energy, with ASEAN on the Preah Vihear Temple dispute matters means not to concern. On the United Nations Security Council is concerned, both Thailand and Cambodia in the Preah Vihear Temple this historical legacy up achievements again dispute, both sides also is combined with the members of the country, was also back to Ann ignored keep world war solid, attachment can talk to deal with conflicting aims. From the level of participation, the alliance of the northwest Asian countries, combined with the national security and the United Nations to play a greater role in the country's educational, scientific and cultural organization. Overall, this is still field excited by a land dispute border conflict, Cambodia used strategy is to help with China and asean. Ann ignore also appeared to support ASEAN to deal with this conflict has made positive efforts, and called on relevant parties to continue and ASEAN cooperation. At the same time, we also can see that, in the disputes on the Kampuchea and Thailand results have their own thinking. The Cambodian authorities wish with national security ignore involved in the handling of the conflict between the two countries border. This is due to the International Court of justice in 1962 the Preah Vihear Temple was awarded the Cambodian side, so Cambodia thought holds the "trump card", the United Nations participate only on the Cambodian side beneficial. Nevertheless Thailand as if not try to be brave, Thailand chancellery talk people Banitan already, if Cambodia is again to the United Nations Security Council praised, Thailand also will further supply instructions. Obviously, Cambodia and Thailand around debates over ownership of Preah Vihear Temple results, treatment is not that simple, must be a long way 目录: |
