作 者：冷丽敏[1] Leng Limin （Foreign Language Department, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China） 机构地区：[1]北京师范学院外国语言文学大学,北京100875 出 处：《课程．教材．教法》2017年第2期52-57,共6页Curriculum，Teaching Material and Method 摘 要：本探讨聚焦基础教育日语课程标准，日语论文题目，日语论文，针对《全日制义务教育日语课程标准（实验稿）》（以下简称《课标实验稿》）与《全日制义务教育日语课程标准（2017年版）》（以下简称《课标2017年版》）的“课程基本理念”“教学建议”“评价建议”的相关内容描述作了文本对比略论，探讨结果表明：首先，《课标实验稿》与《课标2017年版》所体现的教育观念整体上没有改变；其次，《课标2017年版》的内容描述有充实与完善，所体现的教育观念有进步、有与时代同步的发展，并且其关注“学”的这一教育观点更加鲜明。可以认为，从《课标实验稿》至《课标2017年版》，基础教育中的日语教育在教育观念上已经完成了由以往单纯重“教”到更加关注“学”这一教育观念的根本性转变。This study intends to make a comparative analysis between ＂Japanese Curriculum Standards for Full Time Compulsory Education （Experimental Edition） ＂ and ＂English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education （2017 Edition） ＂ in terms of basic rationale of the curriculum, suggestions for teaching and suggestions for assessment. There are two major research findings. First, the experimental edition and the 2017 edition share similar educational belief. Second, the content in the 2017 edition has been enriched and improved. The educational belief reflected in this edition has been able to keep up with the times. It is particularly clear that the 2017 edition puts more emphasis on learning. In conclusion, from the experimental edition to the 2017 edition, the change from focusing on teaching to focusing on learning in Japanese teaching at compulsory education level has been successfully completed. 关 键 词：日语课程标准 课程基本理念 教学建议 评价 教育观念 分 类 号：G633.46[文化科学—教育学] |
