The Reflection of the Differences between American Constitutionalism and Chinese Constitutionalism on Constitution Texts
Abstract
Although China and America both chosen Republic as the base of the country’s politic structure, the constitutions are totally different due to the differences of constitutionalism. Although there has been a lot of discussion on this topic in the law field, rare discussions connected to how this kind of difference reflected on constitutions.
On the other hand, although legal documents are becoming more important in linguistics research these days, rare results were made due to the high requirement of researcher’s comprehensive quality.
This paper’s goal is to find out how the differences of constitutionalism reflected on constitution. First, based on materials, this paper analysis the differences between American Constitutionalism and Chinese Constitutionalism. Then, based on traditional theory of thematische progression, this paper will combine many different theories to develop the T-T-P system. Finally, this system will be used to find out how the differences of constitutionalism reflected on constitutions.
Key words: constitutionalism, constitution, theme, T-T-P system, discourse analysis
摘 要
中国与美国虽然都最终选择了共和政体作为其国家的基本政治体制，但由于两国宪政理念之不同，最终各自制定出的宪法并不相同。虽然此类不同已在法律界被反复讨论，但其关于宪法文本的作用却极少被提及。
在另一方面，英语论文范文，虽然近年来法学语篇作为语言学的探讨材料逐步开始得到重视，但因为其要求探讨者在具备语言学基础的同时具有一定的法律基础，探讨难度相对较大，所以探讨人员相对较少、成果较少。
本文试图通过对宪法文本的语篇略论来解释中美两国宪政思想之不同关于其各自宪法文本的作用。首先，基于有关作品，本文将对中美两国各自的宪政理念及其特点进行比较，并找出其不同。其次，基于传统的主位推进程序理论，本文将对法学条文的主位略论、影响略论与其程序性略论结合起来，发展出专门用于法学语篇略论的T-T-P系统。最后，本文将T-T-P系统投入运用，对中美两国宪法文本进行语篇略论，以探索两国宪政理念之不同在宪法文本中于主位、结构、句群影响等方面的表现。
关键词： 宪政理念，宪法文本，主位，英语论文，T-T-P系统，语篇略论 |
