| 名词化是“人类说话中最广泛的特点之一，但我们对此的懂得依然是微不足道”。这是英语说话学家Roderick A。 Jacobs在其68年作品中提出来的。以英语名词化为专题的研究最早涌现在1937年(JespersenAnalytic syntax)，随后名词化景象的研究逐步获得学者们的存眷。60年月末和70年月，列国的转换生成语法律家们在句法层面临名词化作出了充足的研究，英语方面以Chomsky和Lees为领武士物，法语中也涌现了一批代表人物，如Nicolas Ruwet，Jean Dubois， Lagane Roger等。70年月中期，Sophie Moirand冲破句法限制，对法语报刊中名词化的照顾感化作了一些引见，将名词化的研究深刻到语篇层面，为名词化研究供给了一个新视角。与转换生成这一情势说话学只重视名物化规矩对句法构造的变更起主要感化所分歧的是，体系功效语法从功效主义角度动身，留意到了名词化在语篇层面的组织功效和社会功效，其开创人Halliday M。A。K。在1994年出书的功效语法导论为名词化研究奠基了实际基本，即语法隐喻实际。其实，从新审阅Moirand S。于75年揭橥的题为名词化在书面报刊中的照顾感化的论文，作为其实际指点的照顾思惟与韩礼德提出的名词化隐喻实际是相通的，但比拟之下，隐喻实际更从基本上(语义特点)对名词化的语篇功效作出说明。但成心思的是，体系功效语法在其连接实际中固然明白提出了照顾手腕，法语论文，却没有把名词化看做照顾手腕的表示办法之一。从这点来看，二者又是互补的。最近几年来，由于胡壮麟，朱长生，范文芳等一批体系功效语法律家及学者的尽力，国际外语刊物上陆续涌现了一些以体系功效语法为指点来剖析英语中名词化语篇建构功效的论文。但是由于一些缘由，法语中很少有人研究体系功效语法，更别说以此为实际根据对一些说话景象如名词化，做出更周全的说明。现实上，依据自己搜集的材料来看，法语中对名词化的研究更多集中在60，70年月的句法层面，而且较新的语篇说话学中也很少谈到名词化成绩。这激起了自己的研究兴致。再者，固然浩瀚的说话学家或许学者或多或少都触及到过名词化，法语毕业论文，但其概念懂得上却不尽雷同，也就是说没有一个同一的界说。若有学者，将其算作是辞汇层面的构词手腕，即转类构词法。又有学者，从句法功效看，以为可以经由过程加引号将任何完全的句子转化为名词，由于引号中的内容在句子中施展了名词的感化。转换生成语法框架下的名词化则是完成句子深层构造到表层构造的规矩，但统一框架下对名 Abstract: Nominalization is one of the most widely used features of human speech, but we know this is still not worth mentioning". This is the English speaking scientist Roderick A. Carry out Jacobs in its 68 years of work. English Nominalization is the earliest research topic in 1937 ("Analytic Jespersen in syntax"), then discuss the noun scene scholars gradually get attention. In the late 1960s and 1970s, the conversion of the nations students jurists idiom syntactic layer face of nominalization sufficient research, English by Chomsky and lees led samurai, French has also appeared in the a group of Representatives, such as Nicolas Ruwet, Jean Dubois, Lagane Roger and so on. The mid 1970s, Sophie Moirand through syntactic restrictions, introduce some to take care of Nominalization in French newspaper role, nominalization research deep into the discourse level, in the name of the words of the study provides a new perspective. And the transformational generative this situation learning to speak only pay attention to the rules of nominalization of syntactic structure change main effect differences is, system function grammar set out from the angle of utilitarianism, pay attention to the Nominalization in discourse organization efficacy and social function, which pioneered Halliday m. A. K. In a 1994 book, "Introduction" in the name of the word grammar effect research foundation of the basic theory, grammatical metaphor and actual. In fact, from the new review Moirand S. In 75 years exposing published entitled "Nominalization in written newspaper care effect" of the, is proposed as the theoretical guidance of take care of thinking and Halliday nominalization is actually connected, but in contrast, metaphor more practical from the basic semantic features of Nominalization in discourse effect to explain. But interestingly, the system function grammar in its connection practice certainly understand that put forward to take care of the wrist, but did not take care of the nominalization as a representation of the wrist. From this point of view, the two are complementary. In recent years, due to the Hu Zhuanglin, Zhu Changsheng, Fann and a group of system function grammar experts and scholars effort, international foreign language journals gradually emerged the some system function grammar as a guide to analyze English Nominalization language article construction effect of the. But for some reasons, people have little effect on the system of grammar in French, not to mention the actual scene according to some talk such as nominalization, make a more comprehensive explanation. In fact, according to his collection of materials, the French study of nominalization more concentrated in 60, 70 years and the syntactic level, discourse is a new science talk rarely talked about nominalization scores. This aroused their study interest. Furthermore, although the vast linguists perhaps scholars more or less touch to the noun, but to understand its concept is not the same. That is to say without a definition of the same. If there are scholars, as the speech word level is to exchange the wrist, class formation. Also some scholars, from the syntactic function, think through the process of quotes will complete any sentence into a noun, as quoted in the content cast in the role of the noun in the sentence. Under the framework of generative grammar is to complete the deep structure to the surface structure of the sentence rules, but a unified framework for 目录: |
