“文学性”探讨(2)[俄语论文]

资料分类免费俄语论文 责任编辑:阿米更新时间:2017-05-19
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。

"Literature" is a literary term: the actual liquidation should be logical origin of the achievements and the text should be born matters under its disenchantment; differences on fortune has not been familiar with the system; multiple source identity that is a wolf in the Western appearance of the local concept in translation and the application in reality. "Literariness" is still to still a certain concept, it can be applied to any human movement and category was given different meanings, different professional and popular category of love in every possible way, but seems to have refused to affirm that it is a concept or a proverb. "Literature" in this kind of difficult situation of the reason is various. First of all, the "literariness" was born in Jacobsen's "new Russian poetry" as a judge, but most people only know a word or sentence English translated from French, the most rare is the source of the citation of Ai Henry Baum, but only that a word without speaking or writing; and the first true interpretation and make it become the concept of Ehrlich and the "Russian Formalism" is rarely mentioned. Second, "Literature" and "new" are regarded as the "focal point" of Russian formalism, but the existing original literature can not prove them to be recognized by the Russian formalism. First, the current version of Chinese translation of "literariness" mostly to describe English word "literary" of song translation, while in Chinese language since twentieth Century since the 30's application of "literariness" are often overlooked. It is because of the "Literature" in the Oriental origin has not been clarified, its rheological in the Chinese context of the lack of value, and even people in accordance with their respective needs in the work of the interpretation and application. In a sense, this kind of embarrassing situation of literature "is the characterization of the contemporary literature perhaps practical: neither fundamental governance, and cannot be useful for interpretation of literary scene, only as a kind of" knowledge production "because of the narrow academic circles lament" language off". Although the ancient "Literature" and "literary reality" are not only nearly two hundred years of work, but the literary scene and the study of it has several thousand years of history, it can be said that there is no new literary achievements. Two kinds of defects that exist on the origin of "literariness" performance at present, a thought derived from Jacobsen's "literature scientific research object"; another as Kalle thought that is "what is the question literature" this achievement achievement. From the actual logic to see, the research object of literary literary scene, "questioning what is literature" is the essence of literary aspirations, these do not have to rebuild a term to replace; from the historical literature to see, Jacobsen's application of JIHTeparyPHOCTb is not "literary quality" meaning, while others speak of the translation are under the influence of their mother tongue vocabulary, attached to the "characteristics" and "essence" meaning. To find out the real source of "Literature", must go to the detailed historical context. The concept of "Literature" is the first time in 1955, Ehrlich's "Russian Formalism" will be listed as the most important concept of Russian formalism, and the concept of "new", "French", "situation" and "dominant" are considered to be influenced. Ehrlich's research history ignoring reality inversion time before and after, and portraying Jacobsen as Russian formalism focus will also "literariness" described as a concept with multiple meanings: not only literary "different characteristics", and literary works of "Gestalt quality". The latest Russian poem is traced to the Pioneering Literature of the "Literature", but Jacobsen in this article is to explain: literature and science to study the discipline of literature itself, and cannot use other disciplines to deal with the literature. The Russian word who Eph nineteenth Century has emerged to is Jacobsen's escape is the pinch, "speak standard", used in the literature refers to the top "literature itself (discipline)" or "Literature", but also the significance of tynjanov's Application on the word, the Russians have not regarded as literature special terms. Because civilization in wartime migration and understanding of the shape of opposite partition, research was more practical home a special love and are overvalued and the general circulation. The three edition of Ehrlich's works has laid a "fundamental literature" in the English world understand; Todorov's translation is open in the French speaking world spread; and the absolute close to Russian German and Slavic world of no special response. Important in the world of English "Literature" and its research has gradually formed three forms or shapes: literature research, practical research and cultural studies. Russian formalism and new criticism about literature itself also exist the pie can be regarded as literature research form, in analogy and match basically people thought the two factions of the "literary" interpretation of language forms and coherent, this is important both on home had not used the word. Kalle in a lot of history can not be recognized by the "Literature" is difficult to define. along with

目录:

免费论文题目: