This paper focuses on the assessment of the "evolution results speak turn" in the context of Oriental talk criticism. Surrounded by this achievement, this text strives to speech understanding as the basic angle of view, to Russian formalism, Anglo American new criticism, structuralism and post tectonic doctrine the actual lineages open system carding and analysis, discuss differences refute actual speech understanding of shape, the characteristics and the inner show speak refuted the actual all the thoughts, research perspective and research methods. At the same time, identify the evolution process of the three stages of: speak situation stage ("situation" and "semantic") speak tectonic stages ("construct") spoke motion stage ("text" Deconstruction and "Discourse" theory), and analyzes the three stages in literary studies leading bias and "overthrow" identity, remind them between inorganic and with different contact. Then, taking the opportunity of basic to that speak to refute the growth and evolution of intensional logic clue: from concern "language forms of aesthetic autonomy" to focus on speech motor civilization construction ". Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four chapter notes. Among them, the first chapter and the second chapter discuss the situation to talk stage, the third chapter discuss the construction phase to speak. The two stages of the eve of the body corresponds to the language forms of aesthetic self-discipline "(ERA), and they focus on the research literature talk itself the characteristics and properties of, and taking the opportunity to explain the literature and literary movement: in the fourth chapter, the analysis of speech motor stage. It is associated with relationship" sports talk of civilization construction "(time) according to the. This stage focuses on the character of sports talk on literature and literary movement effect and the protocols, shelter Yu Wenxian production of the operation mechanism to understand and literary interpretation. Specifically: introduction part in to "speaks criticism" and "speak" definition of basically. It is pointed out that the notice of this paper on the topic of international academia talks to the literature research familiar there is a serious "Misreading", this thesis hackles and coherent topic of international research situation, explain the research content, research methods and innovation place. In this paper, "speaking criticism mainly refers to the actual type of literary criticism from the open discussion to start dimension. "Speaking" is refers to the literature criticism about "talk" the indecent read opinions, and explores the literary and speak scores understanding. Speak refuting evolution cause, clue is shown in: differences criticism practice in speech understanding existed significant difference even disparate. Strange said the first chapter is the literature aesthetic and talk the situation. The aim of this chapter is to examine the Russian formalism of speech understanding. In indecent thoughts and research paradigm in the challenge to the traditional literary theory, Russian formalism to hold high the "return to literature itself" and "word retrogradation" banner, called for the establishment in accordance with the connotation of literature and art discipline to stop the discussion of literary superstition. Thus, it is the research object in the definition of "literariness" literature speaking. In its view, the situation is only one factor to speak of literary aesthetics. Based on this, in literary studies, it is hard to appraisal situation of literary influence of thee down from the aesthetic significance, heckle talk literature special performance where, how, how to operate, and constitute the between the various elements of the special relationship between how to distinguish? In this kind of heckle, Russian Formalism "speech understanding" appears as a clue: "the situation, French > effect." "The situation" from the phonological level distinguish literature and talk to speak, especially in the situation of orientation of literature to form; "French" contains two aspects: (1) "French unique". Emphasize the unique literary form, is through the process of the unique artistic skill usually speak a. (2) the situation of "data". Here, Russian formalism broke through the traditional "situation / content" dichotomy, focuses on proving artistic skill is how processing speak "data" ("content"), so the composition of the literary works. "Efficacy" emphasized from the perspective of structural effect to treat literary talk, the speaking situation as for static efficacy system that all kinds of skills in the medium plays a different role and non mechanical accumulation. At this stage, the Russian formalism to recognize the system of literature, and combined with Saussure's preliminary talk and reality, the emergence of the "situation" to "construct" transition growth trend. From talking to refute the view of the evolution is concerned, Russian Formalism's contribution is: important speak from the new "invention" ("situation") is about literature that would speak to the research as literature research indispensable conditions and basic, thus the whole conversion literature practice and criticism results understanding, knowledge structure and the research paradigm, open and advancing the literature research of "talk to". And in Russia formalism early has emerged the "to bud abduction" literature is as with the coexistence of other social and historical series series of symbols to analyze. However, because of the dominant bias, Russian formalism is not out of the literature as independent aesthetic concept on the border. Therefore, it emphasizes in literature to speak of "self goal", pure literature research, seek the superstition of the at the same time, but also a powerful treatment or suspension of judgment and generation of meaning results. New criticism and structuralism from the other aspects of language forms for separation of the two grades. The second chapter talk situation and the semantic ambiguity of the same inorganic. This chapter discusses the important Anglo American New Criticism Speech understanding. Similar to the actual purport of Russian formalism, new criticism will also literary achievement transformation and the results speak for that literary aesthetics in language forms. Nevertheless, compared to the Russian formalism, new criticism concern actually is not a literary talk said situation, but language and literature of semantic features. Therefore, in literary studies, criticism is proposed to "text" for this, advocate for their works "external study" veto "internal research". This kind of important speech understanding in two aspects: first, in the literature composition. New criticism to identify the literature (emotional) talk and superstition to speak, usually speak sequentially presented "pseudo Chen, framework and sarcoplasmic, inorganic structures, multilayer structure" the actual definition. On this basis, it will combined aesthetic forms and the semantic meaning of the literary works of the non concept, think literary ontology is peculiar literary works "semantic structure", the specificity of literature that talk literature semantic double; second, the emphasis on signifier refers to, focuses on the analysis of rhetoric of text semantic consequences. In New Criticism View, "vague" and "paradox", "irony" and "metaphor", "tension" and other fields, the literature is not only speak strange character and composition characteristics with shape representation and is also the text semantic structure complex and rich talk rhetoric method, also formed a "semantic reading" strange criticism strategy. And in the details of the semantic reading, new criticism touched on text "outside" the identity of dim understanding to the rhetoric of ideological constraints to speak. This means, "external study" is not a prison situation analysis, it did not complete partition relationship between the text and the outside the element. Reality, which is the emphasis on language forms of criticism of the fundamental characteristics of the actual, they never literature equal to language forms, more there is beyond pure situation in the field of identity. As speak criticism discourse constitute a period, the new criticism not only defeated the Russian situation principle neglects the value concluded and the limitations of the significance scores, of traditional literary theory formed lasting impact, the speech understanding deeply penetrated into the veins of literary studies. However, it is to know the results speak there is serious conflict with this important achievement, said in three aspects: (1) for literary studies "this" law, but there is isolation and lack of theory of text text. At the same time, in speech emotion features, it also did not release speak reaction on the stereotype of; (2) emphasized text semantic structure of complex meaning and not the sex, and there are inorganic one obsessive; (3) is only to establish the semantic and literary, is unable to deal with the results of meaning generation. These conflicts exist, the new criticism contains self digestion of growth. This is exactly the important reason it is constructed after a doctrine of structuralism, "replace". The third chapter meaning and literature to form. This chapter focuses on the analysis of structuralism criticism speech understanding. Structuralism criticism on the basis of the study of Russian formalism, defeated the new criticism limited by the lack of individual text, and then highlights the language and literature structure and. On its side, the "structure" concept has not late talking refuted as defined in the style construction or entity structure, but to the general situation of the structure. For this kind of speech understanding differences, in the results speak to discuss, it has more than to find literature reason with the situation in aesthetic elements, but to heckle literature significance, after all, from where? Is, in speech analysis and structuralism actually do not pay attention with works of art forms and semantic features, but strive to Saussure's talk to learn form as an example, on literature "meaning" a process analysis, and according to speak of the systematic form to construct the structure, and as the literature research of constant form. In summary, literature research structural types of structuralism criticism covers two aspects: Linguistics and semiotics form form. The former Jacobson's poetry effect analysis, and Levi Strauss, Todorov, Greimas and actual family narrative structure or "grammar" the analysis as the representative. The latter in the literary symbol of the late Roland Bart as the representative of research. Speak in these two aspects of analysis, structuralism criticism home tectonic stresses the unity and signified priority at the same time, more or less attention to the structure and action, multi meaning and context of civilization, signifier and signified between the complex relationship, which examines beauty and the analysis of the culture, construction and Deconstruction of elements of order interleaving the actual format. The actual pedigree will speak words criticism, structuralism criticism in the important role. In speak external structure processing the meaning generation performance, Department released "how literature, how to react career" aesthetic context; but on the other hand, the structure analysis paradigm will also study literature closed in general speaking world to almost entirely from the category of learning to speak that, on the one hand, it will be static talk situation research to acme. The important expression in three aspects: (1) on the relationship between literary system and detailed works, the "construction" as the only final model; (2) in the middle of the deposed the subjective theory at the same time, also denied the literature movement "subject" in identity; (3) involving a total of tectonic element, and contextual factors in the neglect of crowding the non structural system. Thus, it cannot be dealt with in the context of the significance scores. This has prompted the constructive reflection on the limitation of stop. In this sense, the structuralism outside by the emergence of the deconstruction of identity, exactly is structuralism criticism recognize this kind of predicament, and trying to deal with these confuse effort. The fourth chapter first production and civilized construction movement to speak. This chapter describes the important poststructuralism speech understanding. From the "talk to" completely within the terms, research talk means not only a of the results speak in a high degree of concern about, but also refers to the to speak and its relationship to stop from new reflection, thus breaking the Plato. "Talking mirror theory". In order to indecent talk time circumstance of criticism is to study literature to the literature itself speaking symbol system, but still speak "mirror indecent" in the cage. Thereafter structuralism is exactly of philosophy "talk to" response, converted to discuss literature results speak with thoughts and research methods, sports talk to the inside and outside of the text from the new relationship, thus completing the change of criticism to speak. This kind of change in important performances with Derrida as the beginning of the "text" deconstruction way, and Foucault on the theory of discourse paradigm starting. Derrida set out from the angle of dispels logos centralism, the deconstruction of the consistency of "construction" and the symbol, overthrew the action language and writing, literature talk talked and non literary grade relationship, and then highlights the speech motor is the signifier of infinite delay, the text is indefinitely broadcast chain means the scattered, and take this as the basic from the new territories set talk literature and "literariness". Under his influence, to de Man, as the representative of the deconstruction of the United States, emphasizing language and literature rhetoric, advocated rhetorical view, efforts to dissect the text because the tension between rhetoric and grammar, logic, and the conflict with the uncertainty, to expose speak rhetorical movement shape of cognition function construction. Now late Barthes, Kristeva as representative of the structure doctrine (of) the actual text, the talk literature as super learning to speak of the theory of signification, the deposit dependents principle of civilization, and the customs and how to shape the literary text and speech motor how construction of subjectivity, and thought of the text of a certain understanding of the shape and literature but can through the process of speech motor to shape these cognitive digestion. However, because most of the "text" way of political economy, the shape of the identity of master knowledge about all aspects of a theory means the process, limited to the "text" of the consequences of the border. Is it true, neglect the "right to a large extent" (the dominant ideology) is through the process of talking motion effect display. To think and analyze Foucault to speak, common sense and the relations of the rights, to fill the "lack of text" way. He will speak in the vast history of civilization of sports field, to carry on the inspection to the operation mechanism of the theory of discourse, discourse and reveal the common sense and understanding / rights / complicity between shapes. In Foucault's inspiration, feminism, new historical doctrine and post colonial nearly doctrine and so on criticism practice, further calls, modify, internally generated and received to the "Discourse" paradigm and can be put in to study literature, is therefore completely finished talking to criticize the change. Western discourse research Sa Yide's focus on this point. In this sense, the emergence of "cultural turn", "not only not to replace and change talk turn", but is "fracture talk turn" in the process of sustained growth. The conclusion part briefly expounded the characteristics and Enlightenment of the evolution of speaking criticism. Thought, this paper speaks criticism in fact equal to pure "formalism", talk literature research and not only surrounded by speaking situation field to open and civilization criticism more than talk to you with criticism of, relating to, or in place of the research type of it. In the 21st century China's general context, to co-ordinate the talk of "aesthetic" and "civilization" dimension criticism should have a vast room for growth. 目录: |
