| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 热那亚会议(1922。4。10一5。19)是二十世纪二十年月初欧洲最主要的国际会议之一。会议名义上是评论辩论欧洲经济中兴成绩的国际财务经济会议，但现实上是东方本钱主义国度与苏俄间调剂和树立正常关系的初次测验考试。法国固然跻身于热那亚会议提议国之列，但法国当局对热那亚会议的立场整体比拟消极，白里安当局并不是是自觉自愿地加入会议，继任的普恩加莱当局又对会议多加阻拦、横加损坏。法国当局的热那亚会议政策对会议的掉败负有弗成推辞的义务，值得深刻研究。本文侧重就法国当局在热那亚会议准备和召开时代的相干政策作一初步商量。全文依照热那亚会议的提出、准备和召开阶段分为三章。第一章“热那亚会议的源起”追溯会议建议的提出配景和提出进程。十月反动后，法国因为社会轨制和债权成绩对苏俄采用仇视立场，积极支援武装干预苏俄的运动。武装干预掉败后，俄语毕业论文，在经济危机的威逼下，英国等欧洲国度开端与苏俄树立商业关系。对此，法国一方面在政治上保持反苏立场，一方面在经济上觊觎俄国市场。在武装干预掉败后，英法等国试图以苏俄1921年的饥馑为契机，以支援苏俄为幌子，从新将权势渗透俄国，但提出苏俄认可债权是支援的前提。对此，苏俄建议召建国际会议以评论辩论相干成绩。法国因为其一向的反苏政策，对召建国际会议的建议反响冷漠。第二章研讨法国当局的热那亚会议政策的构成进程。英国辅弼劳合·乔治为了使白里安接收与苏俄和德国等欧洲国度配合召开一个欧洲国际经济会议的建议，提出赐与法国平安包管合同的赔偿。出于对平安的寻求，白里安当局在戛纳会议上正式接收了劳合·乔治的建议，但遭到法国国际平易近族主义者的激烈鞭挞，自愿仓皇上台。随后出任新总理的普恩加莱试图经由过程明白苏俄当局参会前提和限制会议规模等措施使会议延期，乃至欲使会议终究夭折。第三章考核法国代表团在热那亚会议上的交际运动。在会议最后阶段，法国代表团在保持戛纳决定前提的基本上尽可能与英国代表团分歧行为，防止承当会议掉败的义务；拉巴洛合同签署后，法国代表团一方面请求宽大德国代表团，一方面在与苏俄代表的会谈中保持在俄国债权成绩和恢复国有化产业成绩上的固执立场，终究招致会议无疾而终。因而可知，法国当局的热那亚会议政策对会议的掉败负有弗成推辞的义务。虽然普恩加莱当局对会议一无所成的成果自鸣得意，自以为掩护了本身的好处，但从久远来看，法国的好处并不是毫无受损。起首，德、俄两国经由过程签署《拉巴洛合同》恢复交际关系，两国的现实接近意味着对法国平安的潜伏威逼。其次，法国与英国的不合日趋尖利化，法英关系在热那亚会议中严重受损。是以，法国的热那亚会议政策“损人晦气己”，只顾面前好处，缺少久远考量，俄语论文，是一次掉败的交际运作。 Abstract: Genoa Conference (1922. Four 5 a 10. 19) is one of the most important international conferences in Europe in the early twenty years of twentieth Century. Meetings on behalf of the comment debate Europe Zhongxing economic achievement of international financial and economic conference, but reality is Eastern capitalist countries and the Soviet Union between transfers and establish normal relations between the first test. France is certainly among the Genoa conference proposed States, but the French authorities on the Genoa conference overall position compared to negative, Briand authorities did not voluntarily participate in the conference, succession of Poincare authorities and of the meeting and stop, wanton damage. The French authorities of the Genoa Conference on policy meeting failure has not the obligations, worthy of deep research. This paper focuses on the French authorities in Genoa conference preparation and the time of the relevant policy for a preliminary discussion. The full text is divided into three chapters according to the Genoa conference, preparation and holding stage. The first chapter "the origin of" Genoa conference meeting back suggestions background and put forward the process. After the October Revolution, France because social track system and the debt problems of the Soviet Union the hostile position, and actively support the armed movement of Soviet intervention. After the failure of armed intervention, in the threat of economic crisis, Britain and other European countries are beginning to establish business relations with russia. In this regard, on the one hand, the French keep anti Soviet stance politically, on the one hand, economic coveted Russian market. In armed intervention after losing, Britain and France and other countries tried to Soviet Russia in 1921 famine as an opportunity, to support the Soviet Union under the guise of, from new power penetration of Russia, but the proposed Russian recognition of creditor's rights is a prerequisite for support. In this regard, Russia proposed an international conference to discuss related problems. France because of its anti Soviet policy, the proposed response to the call to build an international conference, cold. The second chapter discusses the process of the formation of the policy of the Genoa conference of the French authorities. British Prime Minister Lloyd George to make Briand received with the Soviet Union and Germany and other European countries together to convene a European international economic conference, give the French security guarantee contract compensation is proposed. For the search for peace, Briand authorities in Cannes conference officially received the Lloyd George, but was the French international ethnic nationalist intense lash, voluntary panic came to power. Subsequently served as the new Prime Minister of Poincare tried to through understand the Soviet government participating the premise and limit the meeting scale and other methods so that the meeting is postponed, and want to make the meeting ultimately died. The third chapter examines the social movements of the French delegation at the Genoa conference. At the end of the meeting, the delegation of France in maintaining Cannes decides the premise basically as far as possible with the British delegation of bifurcation behaviour to prevent bear the meeting off defeat obligations; after the signing of the contract of Rapallo. On the one hand, the French delegation request large German delegation, in talks with the representatives of Russia and Soviet Union maintained in Russian debt problems and restore the nationalization of industry performance stubborn stance, eventually lead to fizzle out of the meeting. Thus, the French authorities of the Genoa Conference on policy meeting failure has not the obligations. Although the Poincare authorities of conference accomplish nothing results smug, since that cover the benefits of itself, but in the long run, the benefits of France is not without damage. Chapeau, Germany, Russia and China through the process of signed the Rapallo contract "to restore diplomatic relations, bilateral practical close to means of French security latent threat. Secondly, out of France and Britain increasingly sharp, Anglo French relations severely damaged at a meeting in Genoa. Is, France the Genoa conference policy "harm unlucky to others", absorbed in front of benefits, the lack of long-term considerations, is a out of the failure of communication operation. 目录: |
