俄国“纯艺术”派探讨(2)[俄语论文]

资料分类免费俄语论文 责任编辑:阿米更新时间:2017-05-19
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。

Aestheticism, is the middle of nineteenth Century beginning in France and relates to a literary trend in europe. Aestheticism that art should seek pure beauty, that "beauty" is the essence of art, the idea of "art for art's sake". As the history of literature and Western Aestheticism, beyond the reach of Russian "pure art school is in the middle of the 19th century Russian poetry emerged flaunt" pure art of Poetry Faction, its representative is Fett, maykov, Tolstoy, Polonsky, and druzhinin, kopotkin, subsemigroup of. . Annenkov is the actual home of the school. Russian "pure art" sent to the time of unity of western aestheticism is basically not directly approached have characteristics of their own on the aesthetic features, interest in art, literature and art thought. "Pure art school in reactionary democratic refuted the posterior lobe of the dominant in the 19th century, has always been the sport in comparison to the size of a small, did not constitute a strong literary scene and long-term by the unfair to treat and evaluation. However, "pure art school of practical and creative movement but with a stream of pure literary effort involved in 19th century Russia elegant learning process, and in the multidimensional space of Russian literature growth occurred in the deep influence, opened the end of Russian literary modernism. By plain near the main doctrine criticism home, the Russian "pure art school always not accurate evaluation, the Soviet Union after the academic circles also to stop to suppress. With various strata of color will long conclusion "pure art" faction excluded from outside the mainstream literature. No objective understanding and evaluation of the recession had never distorted the glory. Until twentieth Century seventy years, about the "pure art school" of the seminar is more fair off. Our Russian and Soviet literature research circle "selective" translation hinders scholars of Russian literature in the 19th century the actual comprehensive understanding and about reactionary plain Belinsky, Chernyshevsky and Dubois Lo Yubov, near the main doctrine literature and actual overall reception, and as anti democratic confrontation between the surface of the pure art natural is eliminated in the edge zone. Is to get rich results at the same time there are differences in the level of bias. Or not "pure art" pat array for Russian literature in the history of independent existence and the development of the factions, or is speaking in generalities, but not with the other faction consistent view of research. On the "pure art" faction of the description and evaluation, is not too wide and can not be evaluated in many details, is too narrow and therefore can not have sufficient practical basis to study and explain the reasons for the existence of the scope of its continuous. So this is a great obstruction to the knowledge of the "pure art" of Russia. In view of this, this paper in general own study Russia, China and other scholars about Russia "pure art" is the basic on, keep literary works of all the research principle, cheek by jowl joint history civilization criticism, comparing types, system science and text reading method, through the process and the comparison research method, Russia "pure art" placed in the East and the Russian modernism with king be all-round discussion, textual research in the inheritance and innovation in the growth of the Russian "pure art is modernism advanced shape, but also has a strong local characteristics. Secondly, analysis is an extremely heterogeneous artistic amalgamation matter, of the Oriental literary trend of internally generated, the traditions of our country learn deep influence of Russian literature, growth in the multidimensional space and thus depth examination of Russia "pure art value, Russia" pure art sent seminars move one step forward. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into five chapters. The contents of each department are briefly described below: the introduction section differentiates the concept of "pure art". Compare the "pure art" and Western Aestheticism, the concept of decadent doctrine etc.. Looking back on the history of "pure art" and the recent international situation. Understand the object of this paper, initially established the purpose of the paper, obligations and research methods, and put forward the academic and practical significance of this paper. The first chapter from the forty period of nineteen years of Russian social situation, politics, history, period of the historical context of the assessment of the faction, but also from the context of the world civilization and the Russian special ancient process perspective, understand that the occurrence of the faction is not the mother of Western Europe civilization system. The second chapter discusses the occurrence of "pure art" in Russia. Chapeau, born literary history to conclusion of Western Aestheticism of the basic philosophical and practical origin, namely Kant's Aesthetics "aesthetic does not involve the pros and cons", "aesthetic does not involve the concept", "aesthetic only involve the situation" aesthetic principles, and the French "pure art theory and" for art and art "of evolution. And then discuss the Russian "pure art" theory of the country's actual and creative origin. The third chapter uses the analogy method to understand the focus of "pure art" in Russia. Firstly, it shows that the "pure art" in Russia is actually in fact established, that is, the controversy between 1850 and criticism. Secondly sums up Russian "pure art" basic aesthetics, it is important to outline standards and aesthetic idea, and a comparative study with Western Aestheticism

目录:

免费论文题目: