摘要:(摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制,俄语论文题目,下载原文正常,内容请直接查看目录。) 行政诉讼法是一个国度的三年夜诉讼法之一,是司法系统的主要构成部门。中俄两国行政诉讼既有雷同的地方,又有分歧的地方,雷同的地方重要是在前苏联时代,中国接收了前苏联的司法系统特点,是以,两国在苏联崩溃之前,行政诉讼轨制是类似的。但苏联崩溃后两个年夜国获得了自力成长,特别是行政法里的行政诉讼法。中俄两国的司法轨制各有各的特色,恰是因为两公法学系统分歧的作用,使得中俄两国在交际关系,特别是经贸关系中经常产生抵触与磨擦。是以,研究两国行政诉讼轨制的异同,不只有益于两国现行行政诉讼轨制相互自创,配合提高和改良,同时,也有益于两国商业磨擦和抵触的削减,从而增进两国双边关系的耐久稳固成长。笔者作为一个俄罗斯留先生,基于对中俄行政诉讼轨制的沿革和两国行政诉讼轨制现状的剖析,对中俄两国现行的行政诉讼轨制存在的差异停止了比较研究,旨在增强中俄两国行政诉讼轨制的完美,增进两国行政轨制的互相自创。 Abstract: Administrative litigation law is one of the three big procedural law of a country, is the main part of the judicial system. Administrative litigation between China and Russia is similar, there are differences between places, the same place important is in the Soviet era, China received the characteristics of judicial system of the former Soviet Union, is to, the two countries before the collapse of the Soviet Union, the rail system of administrative litigation is similar. But after the collapse of the Soviet Union in two a large country gained self growth, especially the administrative litigation law and administrative law. The judicial system of China and Russia each have their own characteristics, it is because of the impact of two legal system differences, the Sino Russian relations in the economic and trade relations, especially in the often conflict and friction. Is, the differences on the research between administrative litigation system, not only beneficial to the two countries in the current administrative litigation system are created, with improved and improved. At the same time, but also beneficial to bilateral trade friction and conflict reduction, thus enhancing durability of bilateral relations between the two countries stable growth. The author as a Russian left sir, based on the analysis of Russian administrative litigation system evolution and two administrative litigation system status, the similarities and differences between China and Russia the current administrative litigation system stopped comparative study, aimed at strengthening Sino Russian administrative litigation system perfect, improve administrative rail system of two countries each other internally generated. 目录: 内容提要 4-6 引言 6-7 一、行政诉讼基本概念 7-20 (一) 行政诉讼的含义与任务 7-8 (二) 行政诉讼制度的发展 8-20 二、中俄行政诉讼制度沿革 20-28 (一) 俄罗斯行政诉讼制度沿革 20-26 (二) 中国行政诉讼制度沿革 26-28 三、中俄行政诉讼制度比较 28-34 (一) 行政诉讼制度构建背景比较探讨 28-29 (二) 受案范围的比较探讨 29-30 (三) 管辖和审级制度的比较探讨 30-31 (四) 审理程序的比较探讨 31-32 (五) 人权保护的比较探讨 32-34 结论 34-35 参考文献 35-38 论文摘要 38-39 Abstract 39-40 后记 41 |