| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 2017年金融危机事后，国际家当构造调剂方法迟缓，全球直接投资增加乏力，风险和监管不肯定性使得全球经济在较长的时代处于软弱苏醒的过程中。但是处于赓续成长的中国和疾速苏醒的俄罗斯遭到年夜多半内部投资者的喜爱，表示使人注视。与广泛意义上的成长中经济体比拟，处于由传统筹划体系体例向市场体系体例转换的转轨国度，在经济成长程度、经济成长阶段和将来经济走势等诸多方面具有其本身明显特色。因为缺少可供自创的经历，包含中国和俄罗斯在内的各转轨国度在运用外资推进经济转型，增进经济增加的进程中，具有必定水平的不肯定性和摸索性。不公道的引资构造不只不会增进中俄两国的经济增加，反而会形成家当构造掉衡、地域好处分派不均和单一外资起源依附等作用经济平安和稳固增加的一系列成绩。同时，运用外资的不公道身分很轻易被经济转型及全体繁华增加的趋向所掩饰。经由过程比较考核中俄运用外资的措施、起源地、区域散布及家当设置装备摆设等构造性特点，可以或许更深入的懂得中俄在引资进程中所存在的差别和个性，并商量其构造构成的本源。由此，在运用外资对经济增加、社会成长和转轨过程起到的积极效应的同时，透过中俄引资范围低落的外面，深入熟悉中俄两国引资方面所存在的某些实际成绩和潜伏威逼。中俄当局应该重视外资运用构造的优化，自动摸索吸引外资的新门路、新措施，并基于本国经济转型的实际特色，详细思虑将来外资运用的成长计谋，冲破原有筹划经济体系体例的约束，俄语毕业论文，在经济转型的过程中采用灵巧、有用的微观调控办法。本研究以中国和俄罗斯作为比拟研究的典范。之所以选择这两个国度，缘由在于中国和俄罗斯作为世界两年夜经济体，不只具有雷同的筹划经济的汗青配景，并且同处于经济转轨的特定阶段，俄语毕业论文，是以在很多方面极具可比性。别的，中俄在经济转型进程中详细的计谋目的、理论途径的极年夜差别，使得基于两国的比拟研究具有明显的代表性，并能为其他转轨及成长中国度在引资构造成绩的摸索供给自创。本论文整体上运用比拟研究的办法，综合运用纵向比拟和横向比拟两种办法，以使全体阐述更加清楚完全。从论文的章节支配来看，本文重要包含四个部门：一是起首界定本文的研究对象、目标和研究办法，为全文研究供给实际支持。同时在整顿相干的实际和研究后，说明本文研究的根本成绩及其实际和主要的实际意义。二是对中国和俄罗斯这两个典范经济体在运用外资构造方面停止比拟周全的比拟剖析。个中从引资的措施、运用外资的地域起源构造、区域散布构造、家当设置装备摆设构造四个方面，剖析中俄运用外资构造情形的差别和特色。三是基于上一章对中俄两国运用外资构造中差异的比拟，本章从表里政治经济身分两年夜方面，试图懂得作用中俄以致各转轨国度引资构造的构成本源。最初，基于上一章内容的剖析，重点针对我国在运用外资构造中的缺乏的地方，提出能够的调剂偏向。 Abstract: The 2017 financial crisis afterwards, retardation of international industrial structure adjustment measures, global direct investment increased fatigue, regulatory risk and uncertainty of the global economy in the long period of time in weak recovery process. But in the ceaseless development of China and the rapid recovery of Russia has been the favorite of most of the eve of the internal investors, said people watching. With the extensive growth in the economy compared to in the transformation from traditional planning system to market system transition country, in economic growth level and stage of economic growth and future economic trends and so on many aspects has its own distinctive features. Because of the lack of experience for reference, and contain China and Russia, the transition countries in foreign investment to promote economic restructuring, improving economic growth in the process, with a certain level of uncertainty and simply touching. Reasonable capital structure will not only enhance the Sino Russian economic increase but will form industrial structure off the scale, geographical distribution of interests not with a single foreign origin dependence influence economic security and steady growth of a series of achievements. At the same time, the use of foreign investment is not fair, it is easy to be the economic transformation and the trend of the whole city to increase the cover up. Through the assessment of using foreign funds in China and Russia, origin, regional scattered belongings and set the equipment, furnishings and other structural characteristics, can perhaps more deeply know China and Russia in the investment process in the existing differences and individuality, and discuss the structure of the origin. Thus, some practical results which exist in the use of foreign capital to economic growth, social development and transition process up to positive effect at the same time, through the outside Russia the scope of investment low thoroughly familiar with the Sino Russian investment and potential threats. Chinese and Russian authorities should pay attention to the optimization of the structure of the use of foreign capital, grope automatically attract foreign new opportunities, new methods, and based on the actual characteristics of domestic economic restructuring, with consideration of future foreign application development strategy, break through the constraints of the original planning economic system, in the process of economic transformation with neat and useful of macroeconomic regulation and control measures. This study to China and Russia as a model of comparative study. The reason for choosing the two countries, the reason is that China and Russia as two of the eve of the world economy, not only with the historical background of similar of the planned economy, and in a particular stage of economic transition, is in many ways very comparability. Other, China and Russia in the economic transition process with the strategic objective, theoretical approach to the very big difference, making based on their comparative study is representative, and for other transition and growth in the supply of groping for the structure of investment performance generated. This paper on the overall application of the method of comparative study, the combined application of vertical and horizontal comparison of the two ways to make all of the exposition more clear and complete. From the chapter of the thesis, this paper contains four parts: first, define the object of this study, objectives and research methods, to provide practical support for the full text. At the same time, in order to rectify the relevant practical and research, this paper shows that the basic results of this study and its practical significance. Two is to China and Russia, the two model economies in the use of foreign investment structure compared to the more comprehensive analysis. Medium from foreign investment method and application of geographical origin structure and regional distribution structure, the family belongings set equipment, furnishings constructed four aspects, analyzes the differences and characteristics of the use of foreign capital structure between China and Russia. Three is based on chapter of the similarities and differences in the use of foreign investment structure in China and Russia the analogy, this chapter from the inside and outside political economic factor on the eve of the two, trying to understand the impact on the Sino Russian origin so that the transition state investment structure. At first, based on the analysis of the content of the last chapter, focusing on the lack of the application of foreign investment in China, the paper puts forward the. 目录: |
