| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 以后，美国成为暗斗后独一的超等年夜国，俄语论文题目，它的单极位置作用着现代国际关系学的争辩。跟着暗斗停止与苏联崩溃，均势实际也同暗斗一路鸣金收兵了，列国采用的软实力制衡与自在主义成为描写二流国度运用非军事对象推延、挫败与损坏美国具有防御性的单边军事政策。但是，在界定软实力制衡与自在主义同典范交际磨擦之间的差别时存在艰苦，假如其他国度行为不回应美国单边霸权，这对传统均势实际或自在主义实际（软实力平衡）的争辩没成心义。虽然很多国际关系实际的相干批驳增多，但没有发生一个自在主义实际（软实力平衡实际）的完全的经历评价。同舒展到这一假定之上的替换性说明比拟较，本文试图尽量地去除成见，以自在主义（软实力平衡）的一个有代表性的例子商量四种替换性说明中俄在中亚的协作。在结论部门，我简略陈说均势实际与它附加的自在主义实际（软实力制衡）使得它们轻易被接收，俄语论文网站，但也轻易过度运用招致成绩。 Abstract: Later, the United States became the single superpower after the cold war, it affects the position of unipolar modern international relations debate. Follow the infighting stop and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the balance of power is also the actual with infighting disappeared, nations use the soft power balance with liberalism become description second-class countries to use non military targets, delay, frustration and damage to the United States with unilateral military policy is defensive in nature. But in the definition of soft power balance and liberalism with friction model for communication between different existing hard, if other countries do not respond to unilateral hegemony of the United States, the debate on the traditional balance of power actual or liberal actual (soft power balance) not intentionally. Although a lot of international relations the actual coherent criticism increased, but did not occur in a liberal actual (soft power balance of the actual) complete the experience evaluation. The same stretch to the assumption that the replacement of that photograph to compare, this paper attempts to try to remove stereotypes to Liberalism (soft power balance) of a representative example to discuss four alternative that the Sino Russian cooperation in Central Asia. In conclusion, I briefly Chen balance actual with it additional liberal actual (soft power balance easier for them to be received, but also easily excessive application cause problems. 目录: SYNOPSIS 4-9 PREFACE 9-11 CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND 11-17 1.1 RUSSIA AND CHINA –FROM RIVALS TO PARTNERS 11-14 1.2 SINO-RUSSIAN COOPERATION IN CENTRAL ASIA IN SOLVING COMMON ISSUES 14-17 CHAPTER 2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 17-22 2.1 REALISM AND THE BALANCE OF POWER THEORY 17-18 2.2 MODIFYING THE BALANCE OF POWER THEORY –BALANCE OF THREAT AND SOFT BALANCING 18-22 CHAPTER 3 SINO-RUSSIAN COOPERATION –THE CASE FOR SOFT BALANCING 22-28 3.1 REASONS TO UNDERMINE U.S. PRESENCE 22-23 3.2 TESTING SOFT BALANCING THEORY WITH CASE STUDIES 23-28 CHAPTER 4 COOPERATION IN CENTRAL ASIA —THECASE AGAINST SOFT BALANCING 28-33 4.1 ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS 29-31 4.2 SINO –RUSSIAN MUTUAL CONTAINMENT 31-33 CONCLUSION 33-36 BIBLIOGRAPHY 36-40 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 40-41 中文摘要 41-42 ABSTRACT 42 |
