| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 人类迈入新世纪，“基于尺度”的课程改造，已成为列国推动本国基本教导成长的主要手腕。俄罗斯联邦教导部于2004年3月正式颁布《基本通俗教导地舆课程尺度》，这是其在“教导古代化”标语下正式颁布的第一个尺度。俄罗斯教导有着悠长的特点传统，地舆迷信配景雄厚，且其地舆教导在苏联时代曾对我国发生过深远的作用。研究新世纪俄罗斯地舆尺度，对我国地舆尺度的修订和完美有着很强的自创意义。 本文经由过程对中俄地舆尺度在课程目的、课程内容和课程评价长进行比拟，从而得出了一些对我国地舆尺度的修订和完美成心义的启发。 第一部门为引言，重要商量了本文的研究配景，研究意义，并引见了研究的思绪和办法。 第二部门是中俄地舆尺度比拟研究的实际基本，重要以构造功效主义和世界系统剖析实际为实际框架对中俄地舆尺度停止剖析。 第三部门是中俄地舆尺度制定的配景引见。俄罗斯有着悠长的教导特点传统，地舆尺度的发生是在本国雄厚的地舆迷信配景、对苏联时代地舆教导经历的继续和成长等基本上制定的；我国地舆课程成长阅历弯曲，为实行本质教导，迎接新世纪的挑衅等，国度经由过程试验并对地舆尺度试验稿停止从新修订，推出了2017年版地舆尺度。 第四部门对中俄地舆课程的目的停止了比拟，得出了两国地舆课程目的的重要雷同点是都看重地舆课程的普通教导价值，存眷先生地舆焦点技巧的造就等；两国课程目的的差别在于俄罗斯地舆课程目的文明特点显著，并可以或许反应地舆学科的适用价值等，而我国地舆课程目的是一个无机全体，存眷“进程与办法”。经由过程对中俄地舆课程目的比拟，得出我国应在课程目的中恰当融入文明思惟，并反应地舆学科在平常生涯中的应用请求等。 第五部门是中俄地舆课程内容的比拟。从内容构造上看，俄罗斯地舆尺度系统构造完全、逻辑性强，我国尺度指点性、操作性强；从内容组成上看，俄罗斯地舆尺度内容丰硕、看重天然地舆和经济地舆常识等，我国尺度综合性强；从陈说上看，俄语论文，我国尺度以行动目的措施陈说，更具有指点性，俄罗斯地舆尺度之内容加进修办法为陈说特色。 第六部门是中俄地舆尺度评价的比拟，经由过程迷信剖析中俄地舆尺度各自的评价特色，得出我国地舆尺度不只存眷先生的地舆进修成果，更存眷先生的地舆进修进程，而且在评价办法、评价手腕上与俄罗斯比拟有较年夜优势，然则也要参考俄罗斯地舆尺度，设计多条理的内容，知足分歧先生的进修须要，并测验考试构建同一的卒业生程度请求，以包管基本地舆教导质量。 最初是停止语，重要对以上比拟内容停止总结，并从整体上对中俄地舆尺度的特色停止剖析，得出启发。 Abstract: Humanity into the new century, the scale of the curriculum reform, the country has become the main means to promote the growth of their basic teaching. Russian Federation Ministry of education in March 2004 formally promulgated the "basic popular education and curriculum standards", which is its "teaching in ancient times" under the slogan of the formal promulgation of the first scale. Russian teaching has a long tradition, with a strong geographical and scientific background, and its geographical guidance in the Soviet era has had a profound impact on our country. In the new century, the scale of Russian geography in the new century is of great significance to the revision and perfection of China's geographic scale. Through the process of Sino Russian geographical scale in curriculum objective, curriculum content and curriculum evaluation long compared to arrive at the some of China's geographical scale revised and perfect mean the righteousness of inspiration. The first section is the introduction, it is important to discuss the research background, research significance, and introduced the research thoughts and methods. The second sector is the actual basis of the comparison between China and Russia. It is important to construct the theory of effectiveness and the analysis of the world system. The third section is the introduction of the background of China and Russia in the development of the scale. Russia has long taught traditional features and geographical scale occurred in their strong geographical science background, to Soviet geography teaching experience to continue and grow basically formulated; China geography curriculum growing experience of bending, essential for the implementation of the teaching, meet challenges of the new century, the country through the experiment and the geographical scale test release stop from new revision, launched the 2017 edition of geographical scale. The Fourth Department of Sino Russian geography curriculum by comparing the obtained two geography curriculum objective important similarities are valued geography courses teach the common value and save Mr. Juan geographical focus skill makes such as; difference between curriculum goals in Russia in geography curriculum objective civilization characteristics significantly, and can probably reflects the application value of the geographical discipline, while China's geography curriculum objective is an organic whole, pay close attention to "process and method". Through the course of the comparison between China and Russia, it is concluded that our country should be properly integrated into the idea of civilization in the course of curriculum, and the application of the discipline in the ordinary course of life. The fifth part is the comparison between China and Russia and the course content. From the point of view of the content and structure, Russian geographical scale tectonic system completely, logic is strong, our country scale guidance,; from the content of the composition on, Russian geographical scale content is rich, value natural geography and economic geography knowledge such as, our country scale comprehensive; Chen from the point of view, our scale to action to Chen said, more guidance, contents of the Russian geographical scale and learning methods Chen characteristics. The sixth part is the Russian geographical scale evaluation compared, through scientific analysis of Sino Russian geographical scale respective characteristic evaluation that our geographic scales not only save Mr. Juan geographical study results, more attention to Mr. geographical learning process, and in the evaluation methods, evaluation of hand wrist and Russia match have a greater advantage, but also to refer to the Russian geographical scale, multi-level design, need to satisfy the needs of different MR studies, and attempt to construct with a graduate degree request, to ensure basic geography teaching quality. The first is to stop the language, an important comparison of the contents of the above summary, and on the whole of China and Russia and the scale of the characteristics of the analysis to draw inspiration. 目录: |
