| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 本文以俄罗斯2002年破产法为基本，参考英国1986年破产法、美国1987年破产法有关破产治理人的划定，从法理上、逻辑上对俄罗斯破产治理人（仲裁治理人）停止梳理，重点阐述了仲裁治理人的司法性质、选任前提、权力责任、仲裁治理人位置的转化、仲裁治理人的司法义务及监视束缚机制等六个方面。为更好地舆解俄罗斯破产治理人轨制，俄语专业论文，本文第1部门引见了俄罗斯破产立法的一些情形，并对俄罗斯2002年破产法的重要破产法式停止了引见。第2部门对仲裁治理人的司法性质停止了剖析，本文以为，仲裁治理人在破产的分歧法式中具有分歧的司法性质，不克不及混为一谈，特点上的归纳综合更能反应仲裁治理人的实质属性。对于仲裁治理人的选任，俄罗斯2002年破产律例定了积极前提和消极前提（制止前提），同英国1986年破产法具有某些类似的地方，第3部门经由过程与英国1986年破产法的比拟，凸起了俄罗斯破产治理人奇特的地方。第4部门引见了仲裁治理人的权力责任，在普通性权力责任的基本上，因分歧的法式而有详细划定。本部门与第2部门联合，配合解释仲裁治理人的功效、位置。对于仲裁治理人位置的转化，第5部门重点阐述了内部治理人和清理治理人的转化前提和法式。对于仲裁治理人的义务，重要触及仲裁治理人的撤职和免职，本文第6部门停止了引见并剖析了撤职与免职的差别。监视束缚机制内容比拟多，重要包含自治组织、债务人会议（债务人委员会）等私主体的监视与束缚，法院、当局、总统特殊法则等公主体的监视束缚，俄语毕业论文，司法条则上的监视束缚，自治组织的行规束缚等。第7部门外行文进程中对上述监视束缚机制停止了阐述。在结语部门，对本文做一简略总结，重要论述一些相干领会，以期惹起更多的存眷。本文立异的处所：1、内容上的立异。对俄罗斯2002年破产法仲裁治理人轨制停止体系阐述，在国际尚属首例。本文测验考试做些无益的摸索。2、逻辑构造上的立异。论文打破了破产司法条则自己的编章编制，从司法逻辑的层面临破产治理人停止笼统、梳理、归纳综合，从破产治理人的性质、选任、权力责任、位置转化、义务、监视束缚等六个方面睁开阐述，不拘泥于法条上的次序支配，重在从司法逻辑上掌握。 Abstract: Based on the 2002 bankruptcy law as the basic reference to the British in 1986, Russia, the United States in 1987, the bankruptcy law bankruptcy law relating to bankruptcy management regulation, from the legal logic of the Russian people (the bankruptcy governance governance) out, discusses the six aspects of governance arbitration judicial nature, selection of the premise, the responsibility of power the position of the people, the arbitration of governance transformation, management and monitoring of the judicial duty bound mechanism. In order to better understand Russian bankruptcy system, this paper introduces some cases of Russian bankruptcy legislation, and introduces the important bankruptcy law of Russia in 2002. The second sector to the arbitration of the judicial nature of the governance of the people, the article thinks, the arbitration of the differences in the bankruptcy of the judicial nature, can not be confused, the characteristics of the more reactive arbitration governance of the real property. The selection about the management of arbitration, Russia went bankrupt in 2002, establishes the positive and negative premise premise (stop premise), has some similar places with the UK in 1986 third by the bankruptcy law, compared with the British Department of process of bankruptcy law in 1986, raised the Russian bankruptcy governance unique place. The fourth section introduces the power of the arbitral authority, in the common responsibility of power, because of the differences of the French and detailed. The Department and the second departments jointly explain the effectiveness of the arbitration, the position of the governance. About the transformation of the position of the arbitration governance, the fifth sector focuses on the transformation of the internal governance and clean governance of the premise and the french. On the governance arbitration obligations, important people arbitration involves the government dismissed and removed, the sixth part of this article introduced and analyzed the difference between dismissal and dismissal. Monitor the restraint mechanism more important content, including autonomous organizations, the debtor (the debtor committee meeting) monitoring and shackles of private subject, the court, the authorities, special rules of the president of the princess on a monitor bound, judicial surveillance restraint, autonomous organization norm bound etc.. In the course of the seventh part of the paper, the mechanism of monitoring and restraint is described. In the concluding section, to do a brief summary of this article, an important discussion of some relevant understanding, in order to arouse more attention. This article innovation place: 1, the content of innovation. On the system of the bankruptcy law of Russia in 2002, it is the first case in the world. This paper does some good and bad things to do. 2, the logic structure of the innovation. The paper broke the bankruptcy shall prepare its own judicial chapter, from the judicial logic layer facing bankruptcy governance to stop general, combing, summed up from six aspects, elaborated open nature, bankruptcy management person responsibility, position selection, power conversion, duty, monitoring bondage and so on, control does not rigidly adhere to the provisions of the law the order is from the judicial logic control. 目录: |
