| 在2006年,中华国民共和国公司破产法与经由过程数次的修订进程而制订的韩国统合破产法都接踵被制订和实行。依照两国的经济情形和世界潮水被修订的两国破产法,对两国而言,是意义严重的一种变更。本文全体上剖析了中国公司破产法和韩国统合破产法的特点,以两国的司法条则为主停止轨制比拟。注释共分为七个部门。第一章评论辩论了破产法的目标和在现代社会中破产轨制的意义及其需要性。破产有两种破产情势,一是清理型破产,另外一是复生型破产。年夜部门人一听‘破产’这词,普通想起来的是传统的清理型破产,就以为破产是一个清理整顿企业的法式之一。是以,本文解释给债权人、债务人都有赞助的复生型破产‘重整轨制’的意义和破产轨制的基本目标。第二章评论辩论中韩两国的破产轨制系统的本源。中国的‘社会主义市场经济’体系体例和韩国面对过的‘世界金融危机’等特别情形作用了两国的破产轨制的修订。经由过程中韩两国的破产轨制沿革,比拟两国的经济情形和立法思惟,停止剖析司法组成、实用规模等两国破产法轨制的系统和其重要特点。第三章重要评论辩论的是破产轨制的焦点组织--“破产治理机构”。本文经由过程比拟研究,指出两国均采取破产治理机构的代表性机构‘治理人轨制’和代表债务人好处的‘债务人会议轨制’。并且,依照两国的国情,还运营‘债务人委员会(中国)’、‘治理委员会和查询拜访委员(韩国)’。本章还评论辩论了这些破产治理机构的脚色和其需要性。第四章评论辩论了复生型破产的代表轨制‘重整法式轨制’。起首解释了重整法式轨制的意义和其需要性和两国重整法式轨制的停止进程。并且,经由过程两国有关司法条则,停止剖析了两国的重整轨制上的特点。第五章比拟解释了破产法式中息争法式轨制。本文指出,中国公司破产法的特点之一是重整法式、息争法式、破产清理法式都被衔接,停止破产法式。但为了避免因息争轨制的恶用而惹起的负面作用,制订韩国统合破产法时,废除了曾有的息争法。本章解释了其废除缘由,剖析了中国息争轨制的特点。第六章评论辩论了传统的破产情势‘破产清理法式轨制’。经由过程有关司法条则,停止比拟中韩两国破产清理法式的进程和其重要特点,同时评论辩论了破产清理法式的起点站‘破产法式的终结’。结语部门对中韩两国破产轨制停止了全体性比拟,并提出了两国须要改良的部门。 Abstract: In 2006, the enterprise bankruptcy law of the People Republic of China and through the process a few times in the revision process and formulation of South Korea, "unified bankruptcy law" succession is devised and implemented. According to the two countries' economic situation and the tide of the world, the two countries' bankruptcy laws, which are amended, are of great significance to the two countries. This paper analyzes the characteristics of China's "enterprise bankruptcy law" and "unified bankruptcy law" in South Korea, in order to compare the two countries' judicial system. Annotation is divided into seven sectors. The first chapter reviews the purpose of bankruptcy law and the significance and necessity of bankruptcy system in modern society. There are two kinds of bankruptcy bankruptcy situation, is a clean type of bankruptcy, is another type of bankruptcy. Most people listen to the word 'bankruptcy', the ordinary thought of the traditional liquidation bankruptcy, that bankruptcy is one of the company to straighten out one of the procedures. In this paper to explain to the creditor, the debtor has sponsored the rebirth of the type of bankruptcy "reforming a fundamental goal of the system of rail 'significance and bankruptcy system. The second chapter reviews the origin of the bankruptcy system of China and South korea. China's "socialist market economy" system and the special circumstances of the world financial crisis faced by South Korea have affected the revision of the bankruptcy system of the two countries. Through China and South Korea's bankruptcy system evolution, compared to the two countries' economic situation and legislative thinking, to stop the analysis of judicial composition, the practical scale of the system and its important characteristics of the bankruptcy law system. In the third chapter, the focus of the debate is the focus of the bankruptcy system ". This article through the comparison research, points out that both countries adopt the representative organization of the bankruptcy governing body to manage the system of the people and to represent the debtor's benefit. And, in accordance with the national conditions of the two countries, the debtor 's Committee (China), the Governing Council and the visiting Committee (South Korea). This chapter also reviews the debate the bankruptcy administration role and its necessity. The fourth chapter reviews the debate back on behalf of the type of bankruptcy system "reforming French system". First explains the significance of the restructuring of the French system and its needs and the two countries to stop the process of reforming the French system. And, through the process of judicial article, the two countries to stop the analysis of the characteristics of the reorganization system. The fifth chapter is the comparison of the bankruptcy procedure in the process of the French system. This article points out that Chinese "enterprise bankruptcy law" is one of the characteristics of the reorganization of the French, the interest for the French, the bankruptcy liquidation are connected, stop the bankruptcy procedure. But in order to avoid the negative impact of the use of the system of interest for the purpose of the system, and the development of the South Korea "integrated bankruptcy law", the abolition of the law of competition. This chapter explains the reasons for the abolition of the system, and analyzes the characteristics of China's information system. The sixth chapter reviews the traditional bankruptcy situation, the bankruptcy liquidation procedure. Through the process of the judiciary, the comparison between China and South Korea to stop the bankruptcy process and the process of cleaning up its important characteristics, while the debate on the bankruptcy liquidation of the starting point of the French station "bankruptcy procedure end". Conclusion Department of China and South Korea bankruptcy system to stop the whole of the comparison, and proposed the two countries need to improve the department. 目录: |
