| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 色彩反动是近几年国际政治中的一件年夜事，它充足反应了暗斗后世界政治力气比较涌现新的状态，折射出新时代美俄关系的新特色。本文以俄罗斯在色彩反动早期和前期的政策及其缘由为研究对象，起首引见了色彩反动的概略，包含它的界说、特色、本质及其缘由，令人们对色彩反动有一个比拟清楚而完全的熟悉；然后具体概述了俄罗斯在色彩反动早期和前期的政策及其表示，从概述傍边可以看出，因为色彩反动是美国在独联体谋划的旨在减弱俄罗斯实力的一场“战争演化”，独联体列国对此却持迎接立场，使俄罗斯在独联体的位置遭到减弱，也使俄罗斯在国际上的抽象遭到严重作用。作为往日的超等年夜国，俄罗斯决不会负隅顽抗，而是依据时态成长在分歧时代采用了分歧的政策。早期是黯然接收，这在独联体三国的色彩反动中有所表现，前期则过度回击，这表现在经济、政治、军事和文明等各个方面；第三部门重点剖析了俄罗斯在早期和前期采用分歧政策的缘由，这重要是从俄罗斯、美国、独联体和欧盟等各个身分来加以剖析。经由过程剖析，我们可以看到，后期之所以采用黯然接收的政策，这与俄罗斯实力的强大、美公民主化计谋履行的顽强意志、独联体色彩反动迸发的必定性和欧盟赞同色彩反动迸发的立场等有着直接的关系；尔后期之所以停止过度的回击，这与俄罗斯实力的逐步壮大、美国的步步紧逼、独联体色彩反动负面效应的凸显和欧盟不敢过火冒犯俄罗斯有着慎密的关系。只要从俄、美、独和欧等各类身分着手，俄语专业论文，能力深刻懂得俄罗斯在色彩反动早期和前期采用分歧政策的缘由，进而掌握俄罗斯对色彩反动政策的将来新意向和成长趋向，俄语论文范文，从而更清楚地熟悉俄罗斯交际政策的本质；第四部门从博弈论的角度对俄罗斯在色彩反动中采用的政策停止了综合性的评价，经由过程剖析，可以晓得，从早期来看，俄罗斯是掉败者，然则从久远的角度来看，终究的掉分者是美国，俄罗斯才是终究的赢家；最初在前几部门研究的基本上，猜测了俄美在独联体争斗的状态。整体来看，俄美在独联体的争斗将会连续下去，但因为两者互有须要，两边将处于斗而不破的状况。 Abstract: Reactionary is a big event in recent years in international politics, it sufficient reaction the infighting after world political strength comparison of emergence of new state, which reflects the new characteristics of the U. S. - Russian relations in the new era. In Russia in the early and early color reactionary policy and the reasons for the study, first introduced the outline color reactionary, including its definition, characteristics, nature and reason, is to have a more clear color reactionary and completely familiar; then specifically describes the Russian policy in the early and early color reaction and said, from an overview of side can be seen, because the color is reactionary in the CIS United States plan to weaken Russia's strength a "war evolution", CIS Nations are to meet Russian position, Ross position in the CIS was weakened, but also Russia in the international arena Abstract seriously. As former superpower country, Russia would never put up a desperate struggle, but according to the temporal growth policy differences is adopted in different ages. Early is dim and receiving, the color reaction of CIS countries reflected, pre excessive return, this performance in all aspects of economy, politics, military and culture; third sector focus on analysis of the Russia in early and early use of policy differences reason that if from Russia, the United States, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and the European Union and other factors to be parsed. Through analysis, we can see, later because the dim and receive the policy, this and Russia's strength strong, citizens of the United States the main strategy to fulfill the tenacious will, alone conjoined color revolution burst out of the will and the European Union endorsed reactionary burst position has a direct relationship; Seoul late the reason to stop the excessive return. This and Russia's strength gradually grow, American press step by step, only CIS color reaction negative effect highlights and the EU did not dare burned offend Russia has a close relationship. As long as starting from Russia and the United States, Europe and other kinds of unique identity, ability to deeply understand the reason why Russia policy differences in early and early color reaction, and then grasp the future trend of the new growth of Russia's intentions and color reactionary policies, so as to more clearly familiar with the nature of the Russian communication policy; the fourth sector from the perspective of game theory stop the comprehensive evaluation on the color of Russia in the reactionary policies, through the process of analysis, can know from an early point of view, Russia is a loser, but from the long-term perspective, it points out the United States, Russia is still the winner; first in the first few research departments basically. Guess the US and Russia in cis fight state. Overall, Russia and the United States in cis fight will continue, but because both mutual need, both sides will be in fights and not broken. 目录: |
