主权债务危机与货币危机一来自欧盟国家的新启示Sovereign debt crisis and currency crisis a new revelation from EU countries 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 2017年的全球经济危机招致欧洲迸发了严重的主权债权危机。身处欧盟及欧元区的希腊、西班牙、葡萄牙、意年夜利和爱尔兰的情形特别蹩脚。传统的实际以为，泉币危机平日是主权债权危机迸发的主要诱因。这是由于一国的泉币升值将增年夜该国之外币计价的债权总量。但是，一方面，以往的主权债权危机均产生在新兴市场国度抑或是不蓬勃国度，年夜量的实际和实证研究也都针对于这些国度，而此次主权债权危机却产生在经济非常蓬勃的欧盟和欧元区，西语论文范文，这令我们不能不从新审阅以往的研究；另外一方面，作为区域性组织同一泉币的欧元，其危机分歧于以往的单一国度的泉币危机。欧元泉币危机不只仅包括欧元连续年夜幅升值如许的表象，还触及其能否可以或许存续下去的成绩。基于以上两点特别性，本文以欧盟及欧元区成员国德国、比利时、荷兰、希腊、西班牙、葡萄牙、意年夜利和爱尔兰为样本停止研究，起首对欧盟外部商业的全体状态和焦点家当的状态停止了剖析，解释了欧盟外部商业掉衡的现状并指出欧元是促使欧盟外部商业掉衡的主要缘由(欧元窘境之一)，同时还阐释了欧元的另外一个窘境，即各成员国因为缺少多元化的政策对象而对财务政策过度地依附。欧元的两年夜窘境不只仅是欧元泉币危机的本源，同时也是欧洲主权债权危机迸发的主要缘由，而此次欧洲主权债权危机则是欧元泉币危机的表现。在这里我们经由过程开放经济AS ？ AD模子对欧洲主权债权危机的缘由停止了三个方面的阐释第一，希腊、西班牙、葡萄牙、意年夜利和爱尔兰5国面对经济危机时的市场主动调理机制与其它三国(德国、比利时、荷兰)比拟较差；第二，欧元区列国广泛缺乏多元化的政策调理对象；第三，晦气的欧盟外部商业状态使得希腊、西班牙、葡萄牙、意年夜利和爱尔兰5国没有充分的外部商业红利为其宏大的财务收入停止融资，这增长了经济危机后5国的新增债权压力(斟酌全球商业状态时该结论仍然成立)。最初，本文以欧洲主权债权危机和欧元的泉币危机为例，商量了欧盟区域经济和泉币一体化过程中带给我们的三点启发第一，介入区域经济和泉币一体化的各个成员国应当具有类似的经济基本；第二，区域经济和泉币一体化组织应当看重财务政策的感化，施展其自力功能的同时，更须要斟酌保持各成员国之间的调和成长；第三，处于外部商业晦气位置的成员国应该积极自动地介入区域经济中焦点家当的分工和竞争。 Abstract: The global economic crisis of 2017 led to the outbreak of a serious sovereign debt crisis in Europe. Greek, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and Irish in the European Union and the euro are particularly bad. The traditional practice that the spring currency crisis is the main cause of the sovereign debt crisis on weekdays. This is because a country's currency appreciation will increase the amount of foreign currency denominated debt in the country. But on the one hand, previous sovereign debt crisis have in emerging market countries or is not booming country, a large amount of theoretical and empirical studies are targeted on these countries, and the sovereign debt crisis has produced in the economy is booming in the EU and euro area that we can't not from review previous studies; on the other hand, as a regional organization with a currency of euro, the crisis is different to previous single country currency crisis. The euro currency crisis does not only include the idea that the euro continued to appreciate, but also whether it can survive or not. Based on the above two special. In this paper, with the EU and the euro area Member States Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Ireland as a sample research, state of the chapeau of EU external business all state and the focus of his possessions stopped profile analysis, interpretation of the EU's external commercial off balance status and points out that the euro is prompted the EU's external business out of balance of the main reasons (one of the euro dilemma), another of the euro also explains the dilemma that the member country because of the lack of diversification policy object of financial policy excessive attachment. The euro's dilemma is not only the origin of the euro currency crisis, but also the main reason of the European sovereign debt crisis, and the European sovereign debt crisis is the performance of the euro currency crisis. Here we open economy through AS? The reason AD model of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe has stopped the three aspects of the interpretation of the first, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Italy and 5 in the face of economic crisis and the market self regulating mechanism and other three countries (Germany, Belgium, Holland) is poor; second, the euro Zone nations widespread lack of diversified policy adjustment third, the EU external object; commercial state makes bad luck in Greece and Spain Italy, Portugal, Ireland and 5 country without adequate external commercial financial income dividends for its huge financing, the new debt pressure in this 5 growth after the economic crisis (consider global business state the conclusion still holds). Initially, this paper to the sovereign debt crisis in Europe and the euro currency crisis as an example, to discuss the EU's regional economic and currency integration process bring us three inspired first, intervention of regional economic and monetary integration of all members should have similar economic. Second, regional economic and monetary integration organization should value the effect of financial policy, display its independent function at the same time, more need to consider that remain between the member states to coordinate development; third, in external business disadvantageous position of Member States should intervene actively automatically focused belongings of the regional economic division of labor and the competition. 目录: |
