泰国“PAT 7.4汉语能力测试”略论Analysis on "PAT 7.4 Chinese Proficiency Test" in Thailand 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，泰语毕业论文，内容请直接查看目录。） PAT7.4汉语才能测试也被称作--泰国的中文高测验题。它于2017年正式归入泰国高考科目,然则在近几年的测试进程中涌现了一些试题设置方面的成绩。因为该测验着重语法、中国文明和中国传统常识的综合考核,泰国师生广泛反应试题过深、细致、过难。考生成就广泛不睬想。从2017年到2017年,总分为300分的满分,但是加入汉语高考的先生成就广泛集中在70—90分这一阶段。异样作为像日语、法语如许的第二外语测验,异样的分值比例,但是,要凭着汉语高考考入好年夜学却寥若晨星。先生在心思上经常发生不屈衡、较低的“自我效能感”和畏难情感。教员在教授教养上也常堕入教授教养办法选择的抵触,是要选择“寓教于乐”的适用外交教授教养法,照样应试性的常识性的输出法?另外,教授教养内容与高考内容严重脱节,教授教养的难度品级远不及汉语高考的请求。本文将重要经由过程对近几年的试题停止剖析、归结,找出其不公道的成绩地点。运用成就测试实际来讲明其公道性。而且剖析汉语高考涌现的成绩带给先生、教员、国度汉办及泰方的负面作用。最初,提出几个方面的扶植性看法。试图惹起中泰相干人员对此成绩的看重,力图改良今朝的急切状态。本论文一共分为七个部门。第一部门,重要对该论题的研究配景及意义睁开论述。第二部门,对泰国汉语高考及PAT7.4试题停止引见。第三部门,用说话测试学中的效度、信度、辨别度、难度及后效感化几个身分,比较汉语高考的积年成就散布,对试题停止公道性剖析。第四部门,重要详细过细地指出PAT7.4试题的公道处及不公道处。第五部门,从先生、教员、泰国教导部、中国国度汉办等几个方面来剖析,PAT7.4试题带来的负面作用。第六部门,重要从以上几个介入者的角度剖析,若何来转变泰国汉语高考今朝存在的成绩,并详细从教授教养指点等各方面来赐与对策。第七部门,对本论文停止研究综述,及提出论文的研究缺乏的地方。研究注解,“PAT7.4汉语才能测试”在测试内容上过广、难度品级设置上太高,不相符以后泰国高中生汉语进修的广泛程度。测尝尝题采取的于单1、试题冗杂、浏览量年夜,缺少图片类的“视觉材料”。 Abstract: PAT7.4 Chinese ability test is also called the Chinese high test question in Thailand. It was formally incorporated into the Thailand college entrance examination subjects in 2017, but in recent years, the test process has emerged in a number of test questions set. Because the test focuses on grammar, Chinese civilization and the comprehensive assessment of Chinese traditional common sense, Thailand teachers and students of a wide range of reaction questions too deep, careful, too difficult. The achievement is not ideal candidates widely. From 2017 to 2017, a total score of 300 points out, but the Chinese college entrance examination of the students to join the achievement of a wide range of 90 - 70 points in this phase. Similarly as like Japanese, French, such as a second foreign language test, strange score proportion, however, to relying on Chinese college entrance examination was admitted to university, but very few. Mr. in mind often imbalance, low self-efficacy and emotional difficulties. Teachers in the teaching, often fall into the teaching method choice conflict, is to choose the "edutainment" for foreign teaching method, still examination oriented commonsense output method? In addition, serious gap between the teaching content and the university entrance exam content, teaching difficulty grade than the Chinese college entrance examination request. This article will be important through the process of the examination questions in recent years to analyze, boil down, to find out the results of its unreasonable place. The actual application of achievement test to explain its rationality. And the analysis of college entrance examination in Chinese emerging achievements bring negative influence, teachers, Mr. NOCFL and Thailand's. At first, put forward some constructive views. The value of Thailand personnel to try to cause coherent results, tries to present state of urgent improvement. This paper is divided into seven departments. The first section, the importance of the topic of discussion with the king and the significance of open discussion. The second sector, Thailand Chinese college entrance examination and PAT7.4 test questions to stop. The third sector, speak in testing the validity, reliability, discrimination, difficulty and residual effect of several factors, comparative Jinian achievements of the college entrance examination in Chinese spread, on the test stop reasonable analysis. The fourth sector, with important or pointed out at the fair and unfair at the PAT7.4 test. Fifth departments, from the teacher, the teacher, the Ministry of education in Thailand, China and other aspects of the Han Dynasty to analyze the negative impact of PAT7.4 questions. The sixth sector, it is important to analyze from the perspective of several participants, if you change the current Chinese college entrance examination results in Thailand, and in detail from the teaching point of teaching and other aspects to give countermeasures. The seventh sector, the paper on the review of research, and put forward the lack of research papers. Research notes, "PAT7.4 Chinese to test in the test content is too wide, difficulty grade setting is too high, do not match after Thailand's high school students a wide range of learning Chinese. Try to take the test questions, questions, 1 single jumbled views, lack of images like "visual materials". 目录: |
