摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，泰语论文题目，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 泰国高校招生测验轨制已有了较长的汗青，近古代以来泰国履行高校招生轨制改造，从1961年的“Entrance”全国同一测验，到2001年的“Admissions”同一测验，泰语论文题目，2017年的“O-NET”和“A-NET”同一测验，2017年的“GAT”和“PAT”同一测验，再到今朝所实行的O-NET、GAT、PAT、GPAX年夜学退学请求尺度，测验轨制数度变更，直至昔日仍还没有稳固。测验轨制的赓续变革，也直接作用了作为泰国高考选考科目之一的汉语的测验情势和测验内容。泰国高校招生测验的汉语试卷命题人员来自著名年夜学汉语系教员，固然泰国于2017年推出了“汉语教授教养年夜纲”，但年夜纲内容过于广泛，对测验内容、教材运用等未做具体划定，是以命题组并未参照年夜纲出题，而详细的命题参照尺度至今仍不得而知。这给泰国高中汉语教授教养带来了成绩，教员不克不及依据测验规模支配教授教养内容和进度，形成“考”与“教”之间的伟大差别。本文以泰国高校汉语相干专业招生测验试题为研究对象，起首拔取2017年新汉语品级程度测验HSK四级试卷、1999~2017年泰国“高级教导退学同一测验”（Admissions）的汉语试卷和2017~2017年泰国“专业及才能偏向测试”（PAT）的汉语试卷（PAT7.4），对其剖析以总结出泰国高校汉语相干专业招生测验所考核的才能规模和条理，继而经由过程模仿测试、访谈查询拜访法、问卷查询拜访法，再联合泰国2017年“汉语教授教养年夜纲”和校际结合汉语教室教授教养筹划，对泰国曼谷地域高中汉语教授教养的才能规模和条理停止归结，最初将汉语测验规模与教授教养规模停止比拟剖析，得出二者之间的详细差距，并剖析总结形成这类差距的缘由，提出必定的处理办法，借此研究为泰国高中汉语教员在教授教养内容方面供给参考，也为泰国完美高校汉语相干专业招生测验试卷、修订《2017年汉语教授教养年夜纲》供给数据参考。 Abstract: The same Thai university recruitment of students test of rail system has a long history, since the ancient Near Thailand perform college enrollment system reform, from 1961 "entrance" the same test to the 2001 "admissions" exam, 2017 "o-net and A-NET" with a test, 2017 "gat" and "pat" test, to the currently practiced o-net, gat, pat, GPAX University School application scale, test track of several changes until the former is still is not stable. Test rail system change ceaselessly, will have a direct impact on the as one of Thailand of elective subjects in college entrance examination of Chinese test situation and test contents. Thailand university recruitment of students test of Chinese test proposition personnel from famous university Chinese department faculty, although Thailand in 2017 launched a "Chinese teaching of the eve of the gang", but the eve of the class content is too wide, did not make a specific delineation to test the contents of the textbook, the application is to proposition group did not refer to the questions on the eve of the class, and proposition a detailed reference scale is still unclear. This gives Thailand high school Chinese teaching has brought results, the teacher can not be controlled according to the scale of the teaching of teaching content and progress, the formation of the "test" and "teach" the great difference between. In this paper, Thailand University Chinese coherent professional enrollment test as the research object, first select the 2017 new Chinese proficiency test grade HSK four grade papers, Thailand 1999~2017 "teachingsand dropped out the same test (Admissions) and 2017~2017 in Thailand Chinese papers" and professional aptitude test (PAT) Chinese papers (PAT7.4) the analysis, to summarize the Thailand University Chinese professional enrollment test assessment coherent to the scale and level, and then through the process of imitation test, interview survey method, questionnaire survey method, combined with the Thailand 2017 "Chinese teaching thesis" and schools combined with Chinese classroom teaching planning of Thailand Bangkok regional high school Chinese the teaching ability and the level of scale stop comes down, will initially test scale and Chinese teaching scale comparison Analysis, that detailed the gap between the two, and analysis summed up the formation of the reasons of this kind of difference, proposed must approach, take the research for Thailand's high school Chinese teacher in teaching content to provide reference, to perfect Chinese in Thai universities coherent professional recruitment of students test papers, revised "2017 Chinese teaching of the eve of the gang," which provide reference data. 目录: |
