社区主导开发模式关于社区贫困削减的作用探讨 - 以泰国曼谷的Suanplu社区为例The impact of community led development model on the community poverty reduction: a case study of Suanplu community in Bangkok, Thailand 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 本研究旨在商量以社区为基本的成长形式在穷人窟社区的贫苦增添中所施展的感化。在这项研究中，作者选择了泰国曼谷的SuanPlu社区作为案例，由于该社区有着两个分歧的住房项目，一个是“集中式”的室庐项目--“我们关怀的住房项目”；另外一个是“平安住房项目”，也就是引入了社区主导开辟理念（CBD）的住房项目。剖析成果显示，第二种项目确切有助于社区减贫。从居平易近的经济角度来看，得益于社区的资金和福利筹划，“平安住房项目”的居平易近家庭经济状态加倍稳固。从生涯品德的角度来看，泰语毕业论文，受害于社区树立的藏书楼和供给的其它进修资本，“平安住房项目”居平易近的教导程度也更好。另外，社区卫生办事中间的树立和根本卫生常识的供给，也极年夜地进步了“平安住房项目”居平易近的安康程度。与此相反的是，“我们关怀的住房项目”不只没有资金和福利筹划作为保证，也没有可供社区成员接收教导的进修中间和安康中间。研究成果还注解，在社区成长进程中，“社区主导开辟”（CBD）形式有益于优化社区成员介入机制，还有益于增长社区的社会本钱，这也是“我们关怀的住房项目”和“平安住房项目”在贫苦增添方面最重要的差别地点。 Abstract: The purpose of this study is to discuss the role of community as a basic form of growth in the poor growth of poor cave communities in the play. In this study, the author chose the Bangkok, Thailand, the community SuanPlu as a case, because of the differences between the two housing projects in the community, a is "centralized" residential projects -- "we care about housing project"; "safe housing project" is also a, also is the introduction of the community driven development (CBD) concept of housing projects. Analysis of the results show that second kinds of projects to help the community to reduce poverty. From the economic point of view, thanks to the community's funding and welfare planning, safe housing project, the residents of the family economic conditions more stable. From the point of view of career morality, the collection and supply of the community to establish a library and other learning capital, safe housing projects in the education level is better. In addition, the middle of the community health service and the establishment of basic health knowledge of the supply, but also greatly improved the "safe housing project" in Ankang. In contrast, the housing project we care not only does not have funding and welfare planning as a guarantee, there is no available for community members to receive education in the middle of the study and the middle of Ankang. Research results also notes, in the community development process, "community driven development (CBD) form is beneficial to the optimization of members of the community intervention mechanism, and benefit to the social cost of community growth, which is the concern for our housing project" and "green housing project" in a poor increase add on the most important difference place. 目录: 摘要 4-5 ABSTRACT 5 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION 8-13 Ⅰ. Background of the Study 8-9 Ⅱ. Problem Statement 9-10 Ⅲ. Aims and Objectives of the Study 10 Ⅳ. Research Question 10-11 Ⅴ. Statement of Hypothesis 11 Ⅵ. Methodology 11-12 ⅶ. Conceptualization 12-13 CHAPTER 2 – LITERATURE REVIEW 13-25 Ⅰ. Definition and Concept of Poverty 13-16 ⅰ. Poverty in perspectives of academics, thinker and professors 13-15 ⅱ. Poverty from the perspectives of international associations 15-16 Ⅱ. Slum, Urban Poverty and Poverty reduction 16-18 Ⅲ. Introduction to Community-based Development Concept 18-23 ⅰ. What is Community-based Development? 18 ⅱ. Key Element of Community-based Development 18-21 ⅲ. Overview of Community-based Development Concept in Thailand 21-23 Ⅳ. Impact of Community-based development on Poverty Reduction 23-25 CHAPTER 3 – METHODOLOGY 25-29 Ⅰ. Research Design 25 Ⅱ. Selection of the Study Site 25-26 Ⅲ. Unit of Analysis 26 Ⅳ. Sample Selection 26 Ⅴ. Outcome Analysis 26-28 Ⅵ. Limitation of the study 28-29 CHAPTER 4: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON PROJECTS 29-39 Ⅰ. Background Information on Secure Housing Project 29-32 ⅰ. The main concept of Secure Housing project (CODI, 2004) 29-30 ⅱ. Four Slum Upgrading Model Plan (CODI: 2004) 30-31 ⅲ. Investment and Funding Source of Secure Housing Project 31-32 Ⅱ. Background Information on We Care Housing Project 32-34 ⅰ. Structure of building 32-33 ⅱ. Types of community 33 ⅲ. Financial management of the project 33-34 ⅳ. The infrastructure system and public assistancemanagement 34 Ⅲ. Introduction to the Study Site: Suanplu Community 34-39 ⅰ. Overview of Secure Housing Project: Suanplu Community 35-37 ⅱ.Overview of We Care Housing Project: Suanplu community 37-39 CHAPTER 5 – RESEARCH FINDINGS 39-58 Ⅰ. Demographic Characteristics of Sample Households in Two Communities 40-41 ⅰ. Gender of Respondents 40 ⅱ. Age of Respondents 40-41 ⅲ. Marital Status of Respondents 41 ⅳ. Education Level of Respondents 41 Ⅴ. Occupation of Respondents 41-42 Ⅱ. A Comparative Analysis of Poverty Reduction Outcome in Secure Housing Project and We Care Housing project 42-47 ⅰ. Economic Status of Sample Household 42-43 ⅱ. Household Income and Expenditure 43-44 ⅲ. Savings and Debts of Household 44-46 ⅳ.Children’s Education 46-47 Ⅴ. Health Status 47-48 Ⅵ. Living Condition and Environment in Community 48-50 Ⅲ. The comparison between degree of participation and degree of social capital in Sample Household Degree of Community Participation .i 50-55 ⅱ. Degree of Social Capital in Communities 52-55 Ⅳ. Impact of CBD on Alleviating Poverty 55-58 CHAPTER 6 – CONCLUSION 58-65 Ⅰ. Summary 58-59 Ⅱ. Research questions and hypothesis testing conclusion 59-61 Ⅲ. Lesson Learned and Recommendations 61-62 Ⅳ. Recommendations 62-65 REFERENCES 65-69 致谢/ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 69-70 附录/Appendix 70-88 个人简历/RESUME 88-89 |
