Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Research Background
起初，的解析器选择了错误的结构略论，后来他们发现，不适合在所有非常句子结构的初步略论。换句话说，一个GP句子是一个语法正确的句子，开始在这样一种方式，读者最有可能的解释是不正确的;他们引诱到一个不正确的解析，原来是一条死胡同。根据当前心理语言学理论，作为一个解析器读取花园路径句子，他/她建立了一个结构，这意味着一个字一个字。在某些时候，它变得清晰的略论器，一个单词或短语无法纳入迄今为止建立起来的结构：它的路径是不一致的，他/她已经带领下来。GP句子口语交际中是不太常见的，英语论文题目，因为语音的韵律特质（如应力和说话的语气）往往成为解决歧义的书面文本。At first, the parsers select a wrongstructural analysis and later on they find that the initial analysis does not fit the overallstructure of the very sentence. In other words, a GP sentence is a grammaticallycorrect sentence that starts in such a way that the readers' most likely interpretationwill be incorrect; they are lured into an improper parse that turns out to be a dead end.According to current psycholinguistic theory, as a parser reads a garden path sentence,he/she builds up a structure of meaning one word at a time. At some point, it becomesclear to the parser that the next word or phrase cannot be incorporated into thestructure built up thus far: it is inconsistent with the path he/she has been led down.GP sentences are less common in spoken communication because the prosodicqualities of speech (such as the stress and the tone of voice) often serve to resolveambiguities in the written text.
1.2 Necessity and Significance of the Study
由于局部歧义，过程和最终结果和处理GP句子歧的人进行调查的工作机理研讨人类的大脑，人工智能，语言习得和外语教学实践等提供了一个平台。近年来，一些探讨发现，是不完整的或没有百分之百正确的消除GP句子的歧义最终表示。局部歧义解析是一个沉重的负担，从而导致不完整的消歧。有些学者把这种现象归结到一个解析器（费雷拉百信，英语毕业论文，2017年）的认知资源有限，与以英语为母语的人相比，中国英语给学习者的语言能力是有限的，他们很容易产生不完整的，甚至是错误的站在花园下路径一句，到没有太多的相关探讨。本探讨的目的之一是简单地确定谁第二语言的熟练程度和性别不同的科目是否会显示重要和强大的他们GP句子的理解异同。像第二语言能力和性别异同，我们尝试探究的因素，可能会作用在中国英语学习者的GP句子的理解。此外，我们感兴趣的是，这些群体之间的异同是否会作用他们的解析策略。Because of the local ambiguity, the process and final results and the processingof disambiguation of GP sentences provide a platform for people to investigate theworking mechanisim of human brain, artificial intelligence, and language acquisition,and foreign language teaching practice and so on. In recent years, some studies havefound that the final representation of the disambiguation of GP sentences isincomplete or not one hundred percent correct. The local ambiguity is a heavy burdenfor parsing, which leads to the incomplete disambiguation. Some scholars attributethis phenomenon to the limited cognition resource of a parser (Ferreira & Patson,2017).Compared with native English speakers, Chinese English leaners' languageproficiency is limited and they are easy to produce incomplete or even wrongunderstanding of a garden path sentence, into which there is not much relevantresearch. One purpose of the present study is to simply determine whether the subjectswho differ in second language proficiency and gender would show significant androbust differences in their comprehension of GP sentences. We try to explore thefactors, like second language proficiency and gender differences, that may affect theunderstanding of GP sentences among Chinese English learners. In addition, we areinterested in whether these differences between groups would affect their parsingstrategy.
Chapter Two Literature Review
In this chapter, the definitions and classifications of GP (garden path) sentencesare introduced first. Then come the latest approaches and theories concemning GPsentence comprehension, including Bever's syntactic appoaches and other scholars'semantic plus syntactic approaches. And the last part is the influencin
|
