网范文：“ Power Law Signature in Indonesian Population” 蔓延在印尼的人口集中在两个区域,有趣的是,存在幂律规律。我们略论,这一事实可能造成相等或相似的发展；然而,我们还注意到前20个县。如雅加达、泗水、和其他人等。这篇社会范文结尾的一些建议,更多地关注在东部地区城市基础设施建设。我们略论城市在印尼，英语论文范文，关注其人口的变化。在一些国家,人口会偶尔讨论的城市例如,在美国,城市人口达到至少250万(2017年美国人口普查局)。
我们表明,幂律特征在印度尼西亚,认为是由于人们之间的自组织临界性。人们决定是否继续或迁移以得到满足。如果人们生活在kotamadya,但他们不满意,他们会组织迁移到另一个kotamadya根据经验提供更好的生活空间。下面的范文进行详述。
Abstract
The analyzes the spreading of population in Indonesia. The spreading of population in Indonesia is clustered in two regional terms, i.e.: kabupaten and kotamadya. It is interestingly found that the rank in all kabupaten respect to the population does not have fat tail properties, while in the other hand; there exists power-law signature in kotamadya. We analyzed that this fact could be caused by the equal or similar infrastructural development in all regions; nevertheless, we also note that the first 20 kabupatens are dominated in Java and Sumatera. Furthermore, the fat tail character in the rank of kotamadya could be caused by the big gap between big cities one another, e.g.: Jakarta, Surabaya, and others. The ends with some suggestions of more attention to infrastructural development in eastern regional cities.
Keywords: power law, self-organized criticality, cities, population, urbanization, Indonesia
Background on Population Studies
We analyze cities in Indonesia but only concern most on respective population. In some countries, the population occasionally discussed on the cities (Gabaix, 1999; Anderson & Ge, 2017; Blank & Solomon, 2017, Henderson & Wang, 2017; Overman and Ioannides, 2017), however every country have their own criterion-defining on cities and any other regional areas to discuss the population with. For example, in the United States, an area called city when the population reached at minimum 2.5 million (U.S. Census Bureau, 2017).
Concluding Remarks
We show that power law signature in kotamadyas of Indonesia that assumed to be caused by the self-organized criticality among people. People decide whether to stay or to migrate in order to be satisfied. If people live in kotamadya, but they are not satisfied, they would organize to migrate to another kotamadya offering better living according to their experiential spaces. In this case, the self-organization tends to place the critical situations among people to migrate or to stay to have a better living. The population ranked in kabupaten-manner does not have fat tail properties, contrasted to the kotamadya, the power-law exists. The gaussian of Figure 5 The distance and the populations living in several kotamadya 8 the rank of kabupatens shows that the major problem is not among regional but among cities. The power-law signature among kotamadya can be understood in accordance of big gap development amongst; believed to have better living, people urbanize to Jakarta. There is no way to stop the flow of the urbanization, since the attraction of big city will always promise better living. Regarding the discussions in the , we suggest that the government can break the migration flow by paying attention to the infrastructural development in other (remote) kotamadyas. Probably, a good project on this is the project of accelerating development in Eastern Indonesia.
Further Works
In further works, we want to make agent based modeling of regional mobility and poverty trap connected with population distribution in Indonesia. By looking at the micro level (agent) behavior, we want to see the result in macro level as aggregate. By doing this, we could make proper suggestion technical policies.
网站原创范文除特殊说明外一切图文作品权归所有；未经官方授权谢绝任何用途转载或刊发于媒体。如发生侵犯作品权现象，英语论文，保留一切法学追诉权。()
更多范文欢迎访问我们主页 当然有需求可以和我们 联系交流。-X()
|
