普列汉诺夫和列宁对于十月革命的争论再思考[俄语论文]

资料分类免费俄语论文 责任编辑:阿米更新时间:2017-05-18
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
摘要:(摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制,俄语论文,下载原文正常,俄语论文网站,内容请直接查看目录。)

普列汉诺夫作为一个马克思主义实际的集年夜成者,既是俄国马克思主义的前驱者,同时也是列宁的马克思主义实际导师和反动战友,后来他们成长为论敌。列宁则是世界上第一个让马克思的设法主意变成实际的人,他率领布尔什维克经由过程十月反动建成了第一个社会主义国度,对俄国和全部世界的将来都发生了极年夜的作用。十月反动是国际共产主义活动史上一个异常主要的篇章,具有极其深远的意义。然则,对于此次反动公道性和必定性的争辩一向连续至今。1917年俄国二月反动成功后,在俄国涌现了一种特别的局势--资产阶层的暂时当局和工农阶层苏维埃两个政权同时存在。第一次世界年夜战的连续和俄国在年夜战中的惨败使得俄国境内本就不蓬勃的经济更加萧条,穷苦农人工人也加倍难以生计,俄国国民更是提出了“战争、地盘和面包”的标语,请求在朝者必需做出转变。在这类情形下,列宁年夜胆地以为贫苦会使得俄国工人和农人更具有阶层认识和反动性,而俄国的资产阶层的生成脆弱性决议了它是弗成靠的,俄国无产阶层政党应当牟取政权并树立无产阶层专政。而普列汉诺夫以为俄国在1917年其实不具有反动的主客不雅前提,包含临盆力程度、国民的文明本质、国际情况。十月反动的成功仿佛为这场对于俄国事否具有停止社会主义反动和无产阶层专政的前提的论争画上了句号,而反动成功后的后期俄国并没有给俄国国民和世界带来太多的美妙回想。相反,十月反动后俄国实施战时共产主义,招致俄国涌现了严重的经济阑珊,斯年夜林的威权统治也让苏联的社会主义平易近主事业年夜受波折。这让世界的部门学者又一次对此次反动的准确性提出了质疑,进而对普列汉诺夫和列宁的争辩中孰对孰错发生了疑问。1991年苏联崩溃,1999年普列汉诺夫《政治遗言》的涌现又一次把这场论争推向了热潮。二十一世纪这场争辩还在持续。汗青是不克不及发展的,然则回想汗青剖析汗青却能让我们加倍清晰地懂得我们所生涯的社会,这对于我们更好地扶植社会主义无疑具有很年夜的参考价值。

Abstract:

Plekhanov as a set of Marx's a real big, pioneer is not only Russia Marx doctrine, the Marx doctrine is also the actual mentor Lenin and reactionary comrades, then they grow into a. Lenin is the world's first to make Marx's ideas into reality, he led Bull J Vic through the process of the October revolution built the first socialist country, the future of Russia and all the world have a very big impact. The October revolution is an important chapter in the history of the international communist movement. However, about the reactionary justice and necessity of the debate has been continuous. After the 1917 revolution of Russia in February, a special situation emerged in Russia - the temporary authority of the asset class and the existence of the workers and peasants of the workers and peasants of the workers and peasants of the workers and peasants. The first World War and the Russian defeat in the continuous war in the Russian territory is not the more vigorous economic depression, poor farmer workers are also more difficult to living, it is proposed a Russian national war, site and bread "slogan, who must make a change in the request. In this case, Lenin bold that makes poor Russian workers and peasants has more levels of awareness and reactionary, and generation of Russian bourgeois vulnerability resolution it is fluky, the Russian proletarian party should seek to establish regime and the proletariat dictatorship. Plekhanov thought that Russia in 1917 actually does not have the reactionary subjective and objective premise, including productivity level, the national civilized essence, international situation. The success of the October revolution seems to be a full stop to the debate on whether Russia has stopped the socialist revolution and the dictatorship of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and it has not been a great memory of the Russian people and the world. On the contrary, in October after the implementation of the reactionary Russian war communism, Russia emerged cause serious economic recession, Stalin's authoritarian rule also let the Soviet Socialist Democracy cause great twists and turns. This makes the world's Department scholars again to the accuracy of the revolution raised the question, and then to Plekhanov and Lenin's argument in the right or wrong, the wrong question. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1999 1991, "Plekhanov" political will emerge once again put the controversy to boom. Twenty-first Century this debate continues. History is unable to develop, but in the history of the history of the analysis can let us know more clearly about the social life of our society, which has a great reference value for us to build socialism.

目录:

免费论文题目: