出 处：《日语学习与探讨》2017年第5期29-38,共10页 摘 要：本文首先对语言类型学和语言对比探讨的相互联系作简要介绍和说明,在应用大规模语种库进行统计的基础上,对格林伯格提出的部分共性进行验证和修正,对主要语序参项的和谐性进行考察和略论,并分别将汉日语与各自同类型语言进行比较,对汉日语主要语序参项进行类型学定位,再应用语言类型学的相关理论对汉日语数量词语序的异同进行类型学解释,借此阐明将语言类型学引入汉日语言对比探讨的重要性和必要性。This paper begins with a brief introduction and illustration of the relationship between language typology and language contrastive study. On the basis of a statistical analysis of a large-scale language sample, the paper attempts to test, verify and revise Greenberg's partial universals of language, and investigates and analyzes the harmony of several main parameters of word orders. Chinese and Japanese are contrasted with similar kinds of languages in order to typologically locate the main parameters of Chinese and Japanese word orders. In this way, the paper gives a typological interpretation of the differences in the word orders of Chinese and Japanese quantifiers by applying related theories of language typology, and thereby expounds the significance and necessity of introducing language typology into the contrastive study of Chinese and Japanese. 关 键 词： 分 类 号：H36[语言文字—日语] ，日语论文题目，日语毕业论文 |
