从认知语法角度找出引起Ving歧义现象的原因及其对策
文章根据V ing在句中所担当的不同功能，先将V ing歧义现象归纳为6种，英语论文，然后从认知角度找出引起Ving歧义现象的原因，英语论文题目，最后应用入场理论将例句中的V-ing歧义消除。
Introduction
0.1 Background of the Study
Cognitive Grammar, as a complete new perspective of language research founded by Ronald W. Langacker in the late 20t'' century, is different from the traditional grammar, Leonard Bloomfield's structuralism, Noam Chomsky's Transformational Grammar, C. J. Fillmore's Case Grammar, R. Montague's Montague Grammar, M. A. K. Halliday's Systemic Functional Grammar and so on, and nowadays it becomes a favorable new grammar research direction. Since 21St century, more and more scholars followed Langacker's paces, trying to explain all the grammatical phenomena from the perspective of human beings' mental conceptions, and then Grounding Theory came out and has become a well-found theory gradually.
The major representatives of Grounding Theory are: Ronald W. Langacker, John R. Taylor, and Giinter Radden. Ronald W. Langacker is the person who first proposed the concept of Grounding Theory in the frame of Cognitive Grammar, John R. Taylor simplifies and clarifies the structure of Grounding Theory. The latest statement is from Gunter Radden, who applies the whole Grounding Theory into English grammar teaching and interprets all the grammar marks from cognitive perspective.
Among lots of language phenomena, ambiguity takes a big proportion. While in the past, people always used traditional grammar, IC analysis, TG grammar or Systemic Functional Grammar to explain it. Up to now, nobody has adopted Cognitive Grammar to analyze language ambiguity phenomena.
Bibliography
Bloomfield, Leonard. Language. New York: Henry Holt, 1933
Brisard, Frank. "Be going to: an exercise to grounding". in: Linguistics (37) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017
Channell, Joanna. vague Language. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2017
Croft, William&Cruse, D. Alan. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017
Dirven, Rene&Verspoor, Marjolijn. Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017
Empson, William. Seven Types of Ambguity. London: Chatto and Windus, 1949
Evans, Vyvyan. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2017
摘要 5-7
Abstract 7-9
Introduction 13-18
0.1 Background of the Study 13-14
0.2 Issue of the Study 14-15
0.3 Significance of the Study 15-16
0.4 Difficult Points and Creative Work of the Study 16
0.5 Structure of the Study 16-18
Chapter One Literature Review 18-27
1.1 Previous Study of Grounding Theory 18-20
1.2 Previous Study of V-ing Ambiguity 20-22
1.3 The Limitations of Previous Study 22-27
1.3.1 On Traditional Grammar Perspective 22-24
1.3.2 On Modern Grammar Perspective 24-27
Chapter Two Grounding Theory in Cognitive Grammar 27-51
2.1 Cognitive Grammar 27-34
2.2 Grounding Theory 34-43
|
