| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，俄语专业论文，下载原文正常，俄语毕业论文，内容请直接查看目录。） 20世纪末到21世纪初社会生涯的激烈变更推进了俄语的年夜成长,俄语辞汇极年夜丰硕,而构词法体系也是以得以成长和庞杂化。构词法是构词体系分类的根本单元之一。构词法的研究异常庞杂,依然存在着很多还没有处理的成绩,包含对构词法自己术语的界说和分类准绳的不合等等。本文以塔·尼·布茨娃主编的《新词释义-20世纪90年月报刊及文学新词》辞书为语料研究古代俄语构词法及其派生才能。论文的目标在于肯定所研究新词的构词办法及其派生才能,发明俄语构词体系能够的成长趋向。论文第一章总结古代俄语中现有的构词法分类系统：传统分类法,包含B.B.(?)和H.M.(?)的分类办法；以派生词干的数目为根据的分类办法,包含1980年语法中的分类法和E.A.(?)和E.B.(?)的分类法。我们在理论部门采取了E.B.(?)的分类办法,自创了1980年语法中对于分解词的论述部门,并斟酌到了在E.A.3(?)和H.C.Ba(?)等揭橥的文章中提到的古代俄语构词法的趋向(3(?)2001等)。第二章对辞书中所选312个派生新词停止剖析,按照其构词办法分红11组并统计数目,直不雅显示出各构词法派生才能的差别；进而在构词系统中对分歧词类(名词,描述词,动词,副词)的活泼水平停止数据比拟；第三章对派生才能最强的分解构词法停止了具体的研究。对于中国粹生来讲该构词法比拟有难度。经由过程获得的数据我们得出了一些结论：构词才能较强的构词法有4个,顺次是分解构词法((?),合计组成120个词,占一切新词比例为38,5%),后缀法(87～27,9%),前后缀构词法(55～17,6%)和前缀法(22～7,2%)。其它构词法组成的新词数目较少。这印证了说话学界构词法方面之前的研究结论(前后缀构词法除外)。在构词法外部各词类的构词才能存在差别。但以名词和描述词为主,动词和副词为辅的整体特色并没有转变。这是由于新词的发生起首是对新事物停止定名和描写各类分歧特点的须要。从整体下去看各词类的构词办法存在差别：绝年夜部门名词新词(名词合计184个)由分解构词法和后缀法组成,而缩略词法((?))、复正当((?))、截短法((?))、单词化法((?))及沾染错和法((?))除名词外基本不组成其他词类。在描述词新词(117个)发生措施中之前后缀构词法和后缀构词法的能产性最强,而派生才能很弱的后缀分解构词法只运用于描述词的组成。一切派生的副词(8)都是后缀法组成,而动词(共3个)由后缀法和后缀尾缀法组成。依据我们的研究数据,前后缀构词法挤进了强派生才能构词法的行列,在分解构词法和后缀法以后占领了第三的地位,这是之前的说话学研究没有发明的。与许多说话学家对于缩略词法和单词化法在古代俄语中异常活泼的不雅点相反,在我们的研究中,这两种构词法并没有显示出强派生才能,分离只组成了7个和4个新词。相当一部门新词含有外来词缀；如许的词共有51个,跨越了具有俄语缩略词缀的派生词(44个)。可以说外语辞汇的作用还在,而且涌现了新的类词缀((?)),等等。 Abstract: From late twentieth Century to early twenty-first Century, the drastic changes in social life promoted the growth of the Russian language, and the lexical system of Russian was very rich. Word formation is one of the basic units in the classification of word formation system. Study of word formation in very complicated, there are still many yet to address the problem, contains the structure of lexical terms, the definition and classification criterion of disagreements. The Kobita Ni Butsva editor the new definitions - 20 century 90 years newspapers and literary neologisms "dictionary corpus research ancient Russian wordformation and derived to. The goal of this thesis is to affirm the new word formation method and its derived ability, and to find the development trend of the Russian word formation system. The first chapter of this thesis summarizes the ancient Russian existing word formation classification systems: traditional classification and contains B.B. (?) and H.M. (?) classification method; to the number of derived stem is according to the classification of approaches, including 1980 grammar classification and E.A. (?) and E.B. (?) classification method. We in the theory part, take the E.B. (?) classification method, invented in 1980 grammar on decomposition of the word exposition department, and to consider in E.A.3 (?) and H.C.Ba (???), enunciated the article mentioned in the ancient Russian wordformation trend (3, 2001). The second chapter of dictionaries in the selected 312 a derivative word carries on the analysis, according to the word building way dividend 11 groups and the number of statistics, directly shows the difference between each word derivation to; and in the formation of different parts of speech of words (nouns, adjectives, verbs, adverbs) the lively level data comparison; the third chapter of derivative to the strongest decomposition of word formation stopped a concrete discussion. About China students the word formation have more difficulty. Through the process of obtaining the data we draw some conclusions: there are four word formation ability of word formation, sequence is decomposition of word formation ((?), the total composition of 120 words, accounted for the proportion of all new words for 38,5%), suffixation (87 to 27,9%), before and after the hanging structure prefix method and lexical (55 ~ 17,6%) (22 ~ 7,2%). The number of new words formed by other word formation is small. This confirms the talk of the word of the word formation in terms of the previous research conclusion (except for the front and rear of the lexical configuration). There is a difference in the word formation of lexical category in the external word formation. But in terms of nouns and adjectives, the overall features of verbs and adverbs are not changed. This is due to the occurrence of the first word is for new things to stop naming and describing the characteristics of all kinds of differences. Down the overall look way of word formation of the parts of speech are different: majority Department noun words (nouns together 184) by the decomposition method of word formation and suffix composition, and abbreviated lexical ((?)), the complex legitimate (), truncation method ((?), the word method (?) and contamination fault and method ((?)) removed the word basic does not constitute a other parts of speech. In the description of the new word (117) in the method before the suffix word formation and suffix word formation of the strongest, and derived from the weak suffix decomposition method is only used to describe the composition of the word. All the adverbs (8) are derived from the suffix method, and the verb (3) is made up of suffix suffix and suffix suffix. Based on our data, before and after the construction of the word into the strong derived from the word formation of the ranks, in the decomposition of word formation and suffix after the occupation of the status of third, which is before the speech study did not invent. And many linguists on the abbreviated syntax and word method in ancient Russian abnormal lively indecent point on the contrary, in our study, these two kinds of word formation did not show strong derived to isolated consisted only of seven and four new words. Quite a sectoral words containing foreign affix; words such as a total of 51, spanning with Russian abbreviation affixes derivational words (44). It can be said that the impact of foreign language vocabulary is still, but also the emergence of a new class of affix ((?)), etc.. 目录: |
