| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 企业的管理构造是作用企事迹效和竞争力的症结。家族公司的存在和旺盛及其主要性让家族公司研究成为一个旭日东升的话题，也使得企业管理的研究对象从最后的年夜公司扩大抵家族公司的范畴。对于企业管理成绩的评论辩论，不管在治理学照样经济学范畴一向以来都是研究的热门和主流。传统的契约实际善于对公司停止市场条理的剖析和设计鼓励治理层的办法，但对于分歧国度之间具有差别性的管理形式则缺少说明力度。轨制经济学强调轨制身分会作用组织情势、构造及其经济绩效。公司的管理构造是一种轨制的表现，是一个国度轨制情况（正式轨制和非正式轨制）的产品。即便在统一时代，统一种组织情势（如家族公司）在具有分歧轨制配景的国度，其管理构造也会存在差别。但是从轨制的角度来剖析公司管理构造，德语论文题目，只能反应国度之间的异同。对于处于统一个国度或地域、统一轨制情况下的公司，为何会有分歧的绩效则没法做出强无力的说明。 本文的研究目标在于拓展以后的企业管理研究，联合轨制和企业管理实际商量家族企事迹效差别性之源泉，侧重剖析家族公司外部的管理构造与内部轨制情况的互相感化机制若何对公司生长发生感化。本文以企业管理实际、新轨制经济学为实际基本，对家族公司管理构造与轨制情况的互相感化对公司生长的作用树立了一个剖析框架。本研究将家族公司的管理构造分红三个维度，分离是：家族一切、家族掌握和家族治理。拔取中德上市家族公司作为研究对象，经由过程定量与定性相联合的研究办法，对中国和德国的上市家族公司的家族一切权、家族掌握和家族治理及其与轨制情况的互相感化对绩效的作用停止了较为体系周全的研究和比拟。 经由过程研究，本文得出以下结论：内部的轨制情况与家族公司外部的管理构造之间确切存在互相感化以此作用企事迹效，且在分歧的轨制情况下二者之间的互相感化分歧，家族管理的分歧方面也与轨制情况构成纷歧样的感化机制。（1）在正式轨制不太完美的转型经济体中，家族公司的外部管理构造对轨制情况更多地是具有替换感化，二者经由过程互相替换、此消彼长的感化机制来作用公司的绩效，重要经由过程家族成员运营公司来下降内部正式轨制缺掉带来的较高的生意业务本钱。（2）且在转型经济中，轨制对企事迹效没有直接的作用感化，要经由过程与公司的管理构造互相感化直接对企事迹效发生作用。（3）而家族公司的外部管理对绩效则有直接作用，详细表示为：集中的家族一切权和直接掌握有益于企事迹效；掌握权与现金流权的分别度越年夜，企事迹效越会遭到伤害。（4）在德国，家族管理构造的分歧维度与轨制情况有分歧的互相感化：集中的家族一切权对正式轨制表示出替换的措施，而家族治理作为轨制情况的一种互补机制使得公司取得竞争优势，且表示为创建者掌管公司。（5）成果还显示，在轨制情况比拟完美的德国，轨制能直接增进公司的绩效；（6）家族一切权集中度、掌握权与现金流权分别度对企事迹效则均无显著的直接感化；只要直接掌握和家族治理有益于企事迹效的晋升。以上结论注解轨制身分和管理构造其实不必定老是会对企事迹效直接发生作用，公司的管理后果和竞争优势更年夜水平上取决于二者的互相感化机制，而分歧的轨制情况又会招致分歧的互相感化机制的发生。 本文提醒了家族公司管理构造及其与绩效关系的轨制本源，德语论文，发明了正式轨制与管理构造之间对企事迹效的互相感化机制，基于中国和德国上市家族公司的实证研究对实际模子停止了磨练。本文将企业管理实际运用抵家族公司范畴，并联合轨制实际商量轨制情况与公司管理的互相感化机制对家族公司生长的作用，对今朝的企业管理和家族公司研究做出了必定的拓展，基于轨制剖析的管理构造比拟研究丰硕了企业管理比拟研究的实证证据。 Abstract: The management structure of the company is the key to influence the performance and competitiveness of enterprises. The existence of family enterprises and exuberant and main let family business research has become a topic of a rising sun, also makes the management company of the research object from the last big business expand arrived in the category of family business. The debate on the management of the company's management, whether in the field of management science and economics has always been a hot and mainstream research. The traditional contract practice is good at analyzing and designing the management level of the enterprise, but the difference between different countries is the lack of description. Institutional economics emphasizes the influence of the organizational form, structure and economic performance. The management structure of the enterprise is a manifestation of the system, and it is a product of the state system (formal and informal). Even in the unified era, the unified organization situation (such as family business) in the country with a different system of land, its management structure will be different. But from the point of view of the system to analyze the structure of enterprise management, can only react to the differences between countries. With regard to the enterprise in a unified country or region, the unified system of rail system, why there are differences in performance can not make a strong explanation. The goal of this research is to the future development of the company management research, combined rail system and practical management company to discuss family enterprises deeds effect difference source, focusing on analysis of outside the family business management structure and internal rail system of mutual action mechanism that how the business enterprise growth to produce effect. In this paper, based on the actual situation of the company management and the new institutional economics, this paper sets up an analytical framework for the influence of the mutual influence of the management structure and the system of the family business on the growth of the enterprise. This study will be the family business management structure of the three dimensions of dividends, separation is: family, family and family management. Select Chinese and German listed family enterprises as the research object, through quantitative and qualitative phase combination of research methods, influence of China and Germany listed family firms with family all right, master family and family governance and institutional environment mutual action of performance stopped more systematic and comprehensive study and comparison. Through the research, this paper draws the following conclusion: internal rail system and family enterprise external governance structure between exactly exist mutual influence in order to influence business performance and rail of differences between the two mutual effect differences, differences of family management also and rail system constitute divergent like the action mechanism. (1) in a formal rail system is not too perfect economic transformation in the body and the internal management structure of family enterprises to more of the rail system is a replacement effect, through the process of replacement, shift in the mechanism of action to influence corporate performance important through family into member operators to drop formal rail system missing caused by high business costs. (2) and in the transitional economy, the track system has no direct impact on the performance of enterprises. It is directly related to the performance of the enterprises through the process and the management structure of the enterprise. (3) the internal management of the family business on the performance is directly influence, with expressed as a concentration of the family all right and master directly beneficial to business performance; control rights and cash flow rights were more Nianye, business performance more damage. (4) in Germany, family management structure of divergence dimension and the rail system differences of mutual action: concentrated family all right on the formal institutional expressed replacement method, and family governance rail system as a complementary mechanism makes the enterprise to obtain a competitive advantage and shown for the creator in charge of the enterprise. (5) results also show that the orbit of analogy perfect German and rail system can directly promote the enterprise performance; (6) the family all right concentration, control rights and cash flow rights respectively degree of business performance had no significant direct effect; as long as direct access and family governance beneficial by the performance of the enterprise achievement promotion. The above conclusions annotation track of identity and management structure is not necessarily always direct impact on business performance, management consequences and the competition superiority of the enterprise more depending on the eve of the level in both the mutual action mechanism, and differences of institutional environment will lead to different mutual action mechanism. This essay reminds family enterprise management structure and performance of the track of the origin, invented the formal rail system and management structure between business performance of the mutual action mechanism, based on Chinese and German family listed companies empirical study of the actual mold stop honed their skills. The company management application against the category of family enterprises, and joint rail of actual discuss rail system and enterprise management of mutual action mechanism of the family business growth, the current company management and family business research has made certain development, institutional analysis of the governance structure based on comparative study rich management company match empirical evidence research. 目录: |
