| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 在马克思法哲学思惟成长的过程中，德语毕业论文，他重要停止了两次法哲学批评，所针对的是两个在 19 世纪占领安排位置的东措施哲学派别：起首是以胡果、萨维尼为代表的德国汗青法律派，德语论文范文，然后是以黑格尔为代表的德国哲理法律派。德国汗青法律派在 19 世纪占领主流位置的时光最长，而马克思又已经师承萨维尼进修罗马法，对该学派非常懂得，这使得马克思率先对德国汗青法律派睁开批评。 马克思在对德国汗青法律派的历次批评中采用了分歧的立场：在1837年和1842年他重要是站在古典天然法律派和哲理法律派的立场长进行批评，而在 1843 年的批评中他出现出一种带有费尔巴哈人本主义和必定法社会学颜色的“过渡时代立场”。到了1845年对德国汗青法律派停止批评时，马克思曾经确立了汗青唯心主义和理论唯心主义的法哲学立场。 马克思对德国汗青法律派停止批评的重要内容可以分为两个层面：第一，马克思从私法中的占领、婚姻法和立法这三个角度对胡果和萨维尼的根本不雅点停止了批评。第二，马克思批评了德国汗青法律派的哲学基本，与胡果和萨维尼所主意的疑惑主义、实证主义、汗青主义、浪漫主义和守旧主义这五种哲学思潮划清了界线。 从马克思法哲学成长的头绪来看，他对德国汗青法律派的法哲学批评阅历了一个从反思到实际批评、再到对实际批评、终究达到“转变世界”的进程。经由过程 1845 年对德国汗青法律派的批评，马克思叫醒了通俗平易近众的反动认识，表现出马克思理论哲学的精华，即“全体成绩都在于使现存世界反动化，现实地否决并转变现存的事物”。 而在马克思的法哲学与东措施哲学的关系成绩上，东方一些学者否定马克思法哲学的存在，国际一些学者也常常将马克思法哲学消除在东措施哲学史以外，是以我们有需要以客不雅的立场厘清它们之间的关系，并将马克思法哲学复原到东措施哲学史中去。 对于为马克思所批评的德国汗青法律派，我们既要看到其不雅点中消极的一面，也要熟悉到该学派在东措施哲学史上所起的积极感化。 Abstract: < p > growth in Marx's thought of philosophy of law, he is important to stop twice in a philosophical criticism, the is two in the 19th century occupied arrangement position of Oriental philosophy of law factions: chapeau is represented by Hu fruit, Savigny of German Historical School of law, then represented by black Nagel German philosophy of law school. German Historical School of law in the 19th century occupy the mainstream position of the time the longest, Marx also has inherited Savigny learning Roman law, of the school are very aware of, which makes Marx took the lead on the German Historical School of law opened his criticism. & nbsp; Marx in the German Historical School of law previous criticism in the different positions: in 1837 and 1842 he is stand in the position of the classical natural law school and the philosophy of Law School of criticism, and in 1843 the criticism he appeared out of a feuerbachan with HA humanism and must sociology of law color "era of transition position". In 1845 the German Historical School of law to stop criticism, Marx has established the position of philosophy of law in historical materialism and idealism theory. & nbsp; Marx's criticism of the important content of the German Historical School of law can be divided into two levels: first, the perspective of Marx from the private law in occupation, marital law and legislation of Hugo and Savigny fundamental indecent point stopped criticism. Second, Marx criticized the German Historical School of law philosophy basic, and Hugo and Savigny the idea of skepticism, positivism, historical doctrine, romantic and conservative these five kinds of philosophical thoughts draw the line. & nbsp; from the growth of Marx's philosophy of law is the clue, he of the German Historical School of law philosophy of law criticism experience a from the reflection to the practice of criticism, and then to the process of practical criticism and ultimately achieve "change the world". By 1845 the German Historical School of law criticism, Marx wake the plain nearly all the reactionary, show the essence of the theory of Marxism philosophy, namely "all achievement is the existing world reaction and realistic veto and change the existing thing". & nbsp; and in the philosophy of Marx's philosophy of law and Oriental law relations, some western scholars negative presence of Marx's philosophy of law, some scholars often elimination of Marx's philosophy of law beyond the history of Oriental philosophy, we need to objectively position to clarify the relationship between them, and the philosophy of Marxism recover to Oriental Law in the history of philosophy to. on the criticism of Marx's German Historical School of law, we should not only see the negative side of the point, but also to be familiar with the positive role of the school in the history of the Oriental philosophy of law. </p> |
