越南学生汉语中介语（句类）探讨A study of Vietnamese students' Chinese language (sentence) 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 跟着汉语进修的连续升温，越南先生汉语习得的研究也获得愈来愈多的结果，这些研究结果丰硕多样，但绝年夜多半集中在偏误剖析或小的语法项目研究上，缺少对先生准确运用情形的剖析和年夜的语法项目标剖析。本文运用中介语实际、比较剖析实际、偏误剖析实际和中介语语料库研究法、偏误剖析法、比较剖析法等实际办法对越南先生汉语中介语句类的准确运用和毛病运用情形停止剖析，周全描写越南先生汉语中介语句类的概貌，研讨其概貌涌现的缘由，并据此提出响应的教授教养战略，愿望给越南先生汉语中介语句类的进修供给一些参考。全文共分为五个部门。第一部门，论述选题启事、研究目的、实际基本和研究办法，并对相干研究结果、研究规模和语料起源停止解释。第二部门，周全考核剖析越南先生习得汉语中介语陈说句、疑问句、祈使句、感慨句准确及偏误的情形。考核发明，在四年夜句类中，陈说句是越南先生控制最好的句类，准确率达86.72%。其他三个句类的准确率分离为：祈使句73.36%；疑问句71.69%；感慨句71.61%。第三部门，对越南先生汉语中介语句类概貌停止描述，发明越南先生运用汉语中介语句类的全体准确率为85.41%；越南先生运用汉语四年夜句类准确率由高到低的分列是：陈说句﹥祈使句﹥疑问句﹥感慨句，越南语毕业论文，由此可以年夜致推论出越南先生习得汉语四年夜句类的难度由高到低的分列是：感慨句﹥疑问句﹥祈使句﹥陈说句；越南先生运用汉语中介语句类时产生了漏掉、误加、误代、错序、杂糅等五种偏误，个中漏掉偏误和误代偏误最多，且数目接近。第四部门，越语论文，对构成越南先生汉语中介语句类概貌的缘由（准确缘由和偏误缘由）停止了深刻的研讨，重要有：汉语句类自己的难易水平、母语迁徙和先生的身分等，并据此提出了应当针对汉语句类的难点、汉越句类的分歧和先生的欠妥战略等增强教授教养的建议。第五部门，对全文停止了总结。 Abstract: Follow the Chinese learning of continuous heating, Vietnam Mr. Chinese acquisition research also received an increasing number of results. These research results of rich diversity, but must Nianye mostly in error analysis or small grammar research projects, lack analysis for the case of Mr. accurate application and of the eve of the grammar item analysis. In this paper, the application of interlanguage practical, comparative analysis of the actual, error analysis and interlanguage corpus research, error analysis method, comparison analysis method and practical way to Vietnam Mr. Chinese intermediary statement accurate application and fault application situation analysis, comprehensive Mister Vietnam Chinese Interlanguage syntax overview description of reason of the emergence of the profile, and accordingly put forward the response of teaching strategy, wishes to Vietnam, Chinese inter language learning supplies some reference. This thesis is divided into five sections. In the first part, it discusses the reason of choosing the topic, the purpose, the actual basic and the research method, and explains the results of the relevant research, the scale of the study and the origin of the corpus. The second department, comprehensive appraisal analysis Vietnam Mr. acquisition of Chinese Interlanguage Chen sentences, interrogative sentences, imperative sentences, feeling sentence accuracy and error situation. Evaluation of invention, in four sentences, said Chen is Vietnam Mr. control best sentence, accuracy of 86.72%. The other three types of sentence accuracy: 73.36% for separation of imperative sentences; interrogative sentence of 71.61% with 71.69%. Miss intermediary intermediary intermediary of Chinese third sector of Vietnam Mr. statement overview stop describing, the invention of Vietnam Mr. application of Chinese statement all the accurate rate was 85.41%; Vietnam Mr. Chinese four big sentence accuracy rate from high to low breakdown is: Chan sentence > imperative sentence > interrogative sentence > feeling, which can cause of the eve of the inferred that Vietnam's acquisition of Chinese four big sentence difficulty from high to low breakdown is: emotion sentence > interrogative sentence > imperative sentence > Chen said sentence; Vietnam Mr. Chinese statement classes have omit, mistakenly added, wrong, wrong order, a mixture of five kinds of bias, the bias error and error generation error the most, and the number of close. The Fourth Department, to constitute the Vietnam Mr. Chinese Interlanguage syntax overview of reason (accurate reason and error reason) a profound discussion, important are: the Chinese sentence their difficulty of L1 proficiency, migration and Mr. identity, and accordingly put forward the should be directed to the difficulty of Chinese sentence, Chinese and Vietnamese sentence category differences and Mr. defective strategy to enhance the teaching suggestions. The fifth sector, the full text of the summary. 目录: |
