| 疑问句组成是经典而适切的句法律成绩。主句疑问句，和历久以来未获得句法研究看重的直接引语中的疑问句（以下简称直接疑问句）与直接引语中的疑问句（以下简称直接疑问句）表示出多种差别。传统句法研究中标句词可以包括[/WH]特点和强[/Q]特点（如主句/直接疑问句）、弱[/Q]特点（如直接疑问句）或无[/Q]特点（如关系从句）。这固然说明了一些奇特的句法特点，韩语论文范文，然则有划定之嫌。与之相干的句末语气助词和声调等作为直接疑问句独有的特点，其与语用的亲密接洽固然一向遭到存眷，但缺少和公道体系的构造说明，句法位置也一向存在争议。本文彩用Rizzi (1997)提出的制图式研究办法，在试图厘清疑问功效的同时，韩语论文范文，以疑问句末语气词为冲破口说明其性质。我们从直接疑问句与直接疑问句的广泛直觉差别动身，在四种说话（英语、汉语、日语和韩语）、沿两个维度（直接与直接；普通疑问句与特别疑问句）上再议疑问句组成。经由过程比较直接和直接普通疑问句，我们证实前者除采取助词倒装等构造操作以外（若有），语音式操作也加倍活泼，尔后者则必需借助辞汇完成。以制图实际为导向，我们提出辨别“发问”与“疑问”特点，从而将语用目标（追求答复）从情势概念（句类）中剥离。在直接与直接特别疑问句的剖析中，我们发明语音式操作较为自在，并对疑问词核对Int的才能停止了阐述；我们还借助蔡维天（1994）对疑问词的剖析说明了黄正德（2009）不雅察到的句类标志词与标句词的散布，并进一步证明，分歧于黏着语中的疑问词素，疑问词自己缺少疑问特点，取而代之的是以算子和/或变量表现信息缺掉。基于以上不雅察，本文进一步提出“疑问决裂假说”，并测验考试运用该实际处理现实的句法成绩。基于类型学的自力证据为论证增加懂得释充足性，句末词含糊其词的位置也在疑问决裂假定框架内获得了廓清。句末语气助词和腔调重要位于句子边沿，并与语音式有着亲密的接洽，是乔姆斯基最简计划里提到的接口效应的幻想研究对象。上述基于四种说话疑问句的比较剖析为直觉供给了实际化的说明，并获得其它自力研究的支持，进一步丰硕了句法空间，为进一步懂得各类说话景象面前的动因供给了理据，在说话特性中探访个性，向着人类说话广泛性摸索更进一步。 Abstract: The interrogative sentence is composed of classic and appropriate syntax score. Interrogative sentences, and long-standing without syntactic research value of direct speech in the question sentence (hereinafter referred to as the direct question) and the question of direct speech in the sentence (hereinafter referred to as the direct question) show a variety of different. Traditional syntactic research bid phrases can include [/WH] and [/Q] characteristics (such as the main clause / direct questions), weak [/Q] characteristics (such as direct question sentence) or no [/Q] characteristics (such as relative clauses). This is a description of some of the unique syntax features, but there are delineated. With coherent sentence final particles and tone as a direct question unique characteristics, its and pragmatic close contact course has always been a concern, but lack a reasonable system structure, syntactic position also has always been controversial. The color with Rizzi (1997) proposed drawing research approach, in an attempt to clarify the doubt effect at the same time, to interrogative sentence final particles to break a description of its nature. We from direct questions and direct questions are intuitive differences start in four speaking (English, Chinese, Japanese and Korean), along the two dimensions (direct and direct; ordinary interrogatives and special interrogative sentence reconsideration of question sentence composition. Through the comparison of direct and direct question sentence, we confirmed the former, in addition to take auxiliary inversion structure operation (if), voice operation is also redoubling its lively, slander must use vocabulary complete. Drawing practice oriented, we propose to identify the "questions" and "questions" characteristics, and thus the pragmatic goal (the pursuit of the answer) from the concept of the situation (sentence category) in the stripping. In directly with special interrogative sentence analysis. We find that speech to operate more comfortable, and to the question word check int to carry on the elaboration, we use (LF) (1994) of wh words analysis shows the Huang (2009) observations to the sentence category sign words with the target word spread and further proof, the lack of questions in their own differences in agglutinative language interrogative morpheme, question word, instead is to operator and / or variable information missing. Based on the above observations, this paper further puts forward "question break hypothesis", and attempt to apply the actual reality of the syntax score. Based on the typology of independent evidence to demonstrate increased know release adequacy and sentences with the last word vague position is in doubt break is assumed to obtained within the framework of the clearance. At the end of the sentence auxiliary words of mood and tone important located at the edge of the sentence, and speech has a close contact, Chomsky's minimalist program mentioned in the interface effects of fantasy research object. The based on four speak of the interrogative sentence in comparative analysis to provide practical instructions for intuition and get other independent research support, further enrich the space syntax, to further understand all talking picture in front of the supply factor the motivation, in speaking characteristics visits a, toward humans speak widely to explore further. 目录: |
