(摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制,下载原文正常,内容请直接查看目录。) 正如康德的实际哲学要商量“广泛且相对必定的常识若何能够”、理论哲学要商量“广泛且相对必定的品德律若何能够”一样,康德的国际法实际恰是要商量针对一切时期一切国度之间的“广泛且必定的永远战争若何能够”。完成永远战争是康德的国际法思惟的最高理念。康德一切对于战争的计划均以这一理念为最高指点。而这一理念则是康德实际哲学和理论哲学的必定请求。所以在阐述康德的国际法思惟之前,极有需要论述康德的哲学思惟,这恰是本章第一部门的内容。它重在阐述康德哲学的系统性,说明康德国际法思惟作为这一系统的一部门在个中的位置,从而也说明了康德国际法思惟的实际哲学、理论哲学、法哲学等一脉相承的哲学渊源。本文第二部门阐述了康德国际法思惟的政治学思惟配景,重点引见了霍布斯、洛克、孟德斯鸠和以卢梭为代表的社会契约论思惟对康德的思惟的作用,这是懂得其国际法思惟的另外一必备的基本常识。本文的第三部门这是整篇文章的焦点内容,用古代国际法说话和构造解读了康德的国际法思惟,并与古代国际法思惟比拟,意在解释古代国际法实际和理论对康德国际法思惟的继续与回应。但是,德语论文题目,对于康德的国际法思惟,先人亦是褒贬纷歧,德语论文范文,本文第四部门则罗列了对康德研究最具作用力的学者一哈贝马斯和罗尔斯的重要不雅点,并对他们的批评不雅点替康德做了辩解。最初结语部门则阐述了康德国际法思惟虽然已出生两百年,但异样对于明天这个世界具有极其主要的实际意义。 Abstract: As Kant's practical philosophy to discuss "is widespread and must be relatively common sense how can" philosophy, theory to discuss "is widespread and must be relatively the moral law how to", Kant's international law practice is precisely to discuss for all time all state between the "is widespread and will forever war how to." War is the highest ever finish concept of Kant's international law thoughts. Kant about the war plans are based on this concept is the highest point. This philosophy is practical philosophy and philosophy of Kant's theory must request. So before this international law thought of Kant, it is extremely necessary to discuss the philosophy of Kant, this is the first part of the content. It focuses on the elaborate system of Kant's philosophy, that Kant's international law except as a part of the system in the position of the medium, which also shows that the Kant's international law thought of practical philosophy, philosophy, philosophy of law, such as can be traced to the same origin of philosophical origin. The second part of this article expounds the Kant's international law thought political ideological background, introduces Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu and by Rousseau as representatives of the social contract on thoughts of Kant's thoughts, which is know the thought of international law also a necessary basic knowledge. The third sector which is the focus of the content of the whole article, with ancient international law to speak and tectonic interpretation of Kant's international law however, and with ancient international fath however compared to intended to ancient international law theory and the practice of Kant's thought of international law interpretation to and response. But Kant international fath however, ancestors is also the appraise of the divergent, the fourth part list of Kant's discussion of the most influential scholars of Habermas and Rawls important indecent point, and criticism of their indecent point for Kant defended. The initial conclusion discussed Kant's international fath however although have been born 200 years, but strange has extremely important practical significance with regard to the world of tomorrow. 目录: 中文摘要 4-5 Abstract 5 绪论 7-10 本探讨课题的学术背景及其意义 7-8 本探讨领域的探讨进展、有待深入探讨的问题 8-9 本探讨课题的主要探讨内容 9-10 第一章 从康德哲学的体系性看康德国际法思想的哲学渊源及其在康德哲学体系中的地位 10-18 1.1 康德哲学的体系性 10-11 1.2 康德的理论哲学 11-12 1.3 康德的实践哲学 12-14 1.4 康德的法权哲学 14-18 第二章 康德国际法思想的政治学思想背景 18-23 2.1 霍布斯自然状态学说对康德的作用 18-20 2.2 洛克的天赋人权学说对康德思想的作用 20-21 2.3 孟德斯鸠的权力分立学说对康德的作用 21-22 2.4 社会契约理论对康德的作用 22-23 第三章 康德的国际法思想概述 23-43 3.1 康德国际法思想的论证前提 23-24 3.2 康德国际法思想的最高理念—实现永久和平 24-25 3.3 康德的国际法思想的主要内容及现代国际法理论和实践对其的继承、回应和比较 25-43 3.3.1 康德的国际法主体论 25-26 3.3.2 康德的有关国家权利的保障论 26-32 3.3.3 康德的和平共处的思想 32-35 3.3.4 康德的互不干涉内政思想 35-36 3.3.5 康德的国家主权思想 36-39 3.3.6 康德的国际人道主义法思想 39-43 第四章 后世对康德国际法思想的质疑与批判 43-47 4.1 对康德国际法思想的质疑与批判 43-45 4.2 对“上述质疑和批判”的批判 45-47 结语 47-48 参考文献 48-51 在学期间的探讨成果 51-52 致谢 52 |