(摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制,德语专业论文,德语论文网站,下载原文正常,内容请直接查看目录。) 本文研究对象为德国《有价证券获得与收买法》中划定的障碍禁令司法轨制。采用的研究办法有司法经济剖析办法、司法教义学研究办法,和对德公法的有关划定做辞意剖析、目标论剖析、汗青剖析和系统化剖析等。本文的根本内容以下第一章障碍禁令概论。本章阐述障碍禁令司法标准的标准对象、该司法轨制存在的轨制价值和在德国《有价证券获得与收买法》立法进程中该划定的变更及缘由。本章将以司法经济学视角对企业收买和障碍禁令停止剖析。在《有价证券获得与收买法》失效前后德公法律界对障碍禁令自己在司法系统内的位置和属性等成绩的商量和对障碍禁令从宪法和司法政策层面角度的批驳。第二章障碍禁令的组成要件。本章对障碍禁令自己的标准内容、实用规模、实用主体和组成要件等做出剖析阐述。特殊是对德国障碍禁令司法轨制中划定的“合适于障碍要约的胜利”这一焦点组成要件停止略论论述。第三章障碍禁令的破例。本章对障碍禁令的破例情形停止剖析研究。联合第一章所述的德国立法者对障碍禁令规制形式的选择,剖析障碍禁令与企业法之间在司法实用上的关系、障碍禁令三种破例划定之间和与贮备受权禁令之间在司法实用上的关系、三种破例情形自己的组成要件。第四章障碍禁令轨制对我国的自创意义。本章阐述我国企业要约收买立法的现状及其成绩,进一步剖析德国障碍禁令轨制对我国的自创意义。重要表现在明白掩护目的企业股东决议自在和确立其在决议实行反收买办法的司法位置;仿效德国障碍禁令轨制引入归纳综合性组成要件,更完美地规制收买要约停止时代目的企业董事会的行动;明白划定寻觅竞价要约进攻办法;确立在收买要约停止时代目的企业运营运动不受不适当障碍的司法准绳。本文结论是,德国立法者经由过程障碍禁令轨制在掩护作为企业一切权人的股东的好处与掩护德国企业在欧盟与国际市场上坚持有用的反收买手腕之间做出均衡,并到达统筹两种好处和完成其立法目标的感化。我国在将来可以参考德国立法完美我国的有关司法划定,同时德国粹术界对障碍禁令的评论辩论也为我国司法理论中经由过程司法说明弥补司法中能够存在的破绽供给无益的参考。 Abstract: The object of this paper is to study the legal system of the legal system in the judicial system, which is the obstacle to the acquisition and acquisition of the securities in Germany. The methods used in the study of the judicial and economic analysis, the research methods of the judicial doctrine, and the relevant regulations of the public law, the purpose of the analysis, the goal of the analysis, historical analysis and systematic analysis, etc.. The basic content of this article is the introduction to the first chapter of the barriers to the barrier. This chapter describes the standard object of the obstacles to the prohibition of justice, the existence of the system of the judicial system of the rail system in Germany, the value of the acquisition and acquisition of securities in Germany, the legislative process of the change and reason. In this chapter, we will analyze the company to buy and the barrier to stop the analysis from the perspective of judicial economics. In the securities obtained and buy the law "before and after the failure de law science circles discuss on obstacle ban in the judicial system of position and attribute of achievement and of barriers to ban from the Constitution and judicial policy perspective of criticism. Second chapter barriers to the composition of the elements of the ban. In this chapter, the author analyzes the obstacles to its own standard, practical size, practical subject, and the elements of the elements. In particular, the focus is on the key elements of the judicial system, which is defined as "the right to an obstacle to the victory of the obstacles". The third chapter ban disorder as an exception. This chapter of the obstacle analysis ban exception case. Combined with the first chapter the German lawmakers on the regulation form of the disorder ban choice and analysis of obstacle ban between the company law and in the judicial practical relations, the ban on three exception delineate between and reserve authorized between the ban and in the judicial practical relationship, three exceptional situation shaped their constituents. The fourth chapter barrier to the system of the prohibition of the system of our country. This chapter describes the status quo of China's company offer to buy and the results, further analysis of the German barriers to the system of China's own sense of. The important performance in the understanding of the protection of the company's shareholders' resolution to ease and establish its position in the resolution of the anti acquisition approach, the introduction of the German barriers to the introduction of a comprehensive summary of elements, more perfect regulation to buy off the board of directors of the company's board of directors. This paper concludes that the German lawmakers have a balance between the benefits and the cover of German companies in the EU and the international market, and to achieve the goal of balancing the benefits of the two kinds of anti - purchase of German companies in the EU and the international market. In China in the future can refer to the German legislation and perfect the relevant legal provisions, also German science to the ban on obstacles comment debate for the judicial practice in China through the judicial process that make up the judicial can exist flaw supply beneficial reference. 目录: |