| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，德语专业论文，内容请直接查看目录。） 以后,我国正处于经济疾速成长和社会周全转型的症结时代,浩瀚蓬勃国度和后古代化国度的经历注解,这一时代也是社会抵触多发期,表示为群体性事宜、干群抵触和抵触、经济情势变更莫测、当局政策滞后且连续性不强等。为了应对金融危机的冲击,中心当局合时、武断地启动了四万亿投资筹划,处所当局也运用了财务力气积极地干涉经济成长,今朝曾经获得了必定的成效。据此可以看出,当局的财务政策对于经济成长具有极年夜地推进感化。然则若何公道、高效地运用当局的财务资金,树立标准、严厉的财务预算体系体例,这对世界列国来讲都是个困难。巴西的介入式预算就是一种进步财务资金运用效能,完成社会资本公正分派的优越政策,它经由过程吸引国民介入,付与国民直接行使其平易近主权力,由国民与当局配合协商决议财务资金运用筹划。理论证实,巴西的改造长短常胜利的。德国的介入式预算分歧于巴西。本文经由过程对德国柏林利希滕贝格介入式预算来源、产生、成长进程的考核,弄清了德国介入式预算的目的,即加强当局的正当性基本,推动当局行政治理古代化,应对日趋严格的财务窘境和繁重的财务压力。接着又剖析了德国柏林利希滕贝格处所当局的介入式预算政策若何经由过程与国民就财务预算案的制订和履行的公共协商,拓展国民介入的措施,包含国民年夜会、社区居平易近会议、问卷查询拜访、互联网对话平台、德律风征询、技巧指点等门路,若何立异当局及财务信息地下措施,包含互联网、国民年夜会、年夜众媒体、海报传单、节沐日庆典等对象,若何构建多样化的当局与国民沟通渠道,进步国民的介入认识,增进国民平易近主权力的行使,进步行政效力,处理财务缺乏的成绩。理论证实,德国的介入式预算轨制获得了必定的成效。中国今朝的情势与德国很有类似的地方,面对异样的经济和社会成绩,2003年税费改造后,处所当局的财务状态绝后重要,重要的干群关系激发的抵触和抵触也一再涌现。固然中国也停止了一些介入式预算实验,然则还有一些缺乏的地方,好比信息不敷通明,轨制供应滞后,缺少社会公平性,对介入主体的限制前提单一,介入率高等。假如能自创德国柏林利希滕贝格摸索的推进信息地下、国民介入、政治协商、完美下层平易近主的经历,对于填补中国理论中的缺乏的地方,冲破现有的财务窘境,改革下层平易近主管理格式,推行直接平易近主轨制具有严重的意义。 Abstract: Later, China is in rapid economic growth and social comprehensive transformation of the crux of the era, vast country vigorously and post modern countries experience notes, this era is also the social conflict period, said for the group of matters, the cadres and the masses in the conflict and conflict, economic situation change unfathomable and policy authorities lag and continuity is not strong,. In order to cope with the financial crisis impact, central authorities timely, arbitrary launched four trillion investment plans, local authorities also used financial strength to actively intervene in the economy growth, and China has achieved certain results. As can be seen, the government's financial policy on economic growth has a very significant role in promoting. But how reasonable and efficient use of the authority of the financial capital, establish a standard, strict financial budget system, which is difficult for the world's countries. Brazil's intrusive budget is a progress financial capital application efficiency, capital of social fairness and justice is assigned superior policies, it through the process of attracting national intervention, entrusted with the people directly exercise their democratic rights, by national and local authorities with planning the use of financial funds to negotiate a resolution. Theory has proved that Brazil's transformation is very successful. The differences in Brazil Germany intrusive budget. This paper through the process to Berlin, Germany lichten Berg intrusive budgetary sources, produce, growth process of assessment, to ascertain the German intrusive budget, enhance the government's legitimacy of basic, and promote administration management modernization, to deal with increasingly stringent financial dilemma and heavy financial pressure. Then analyzes the Berlin Lichtenberg local government budget policy by Ruo He intrusive public consultation process and the national financial budget formulation and performance, to develop methods of national intervention, including national party, community residents in the meeting, the questionnaire survey, the Internet platform for dialogue, telephone consultation, technical guidance such opportunities, Ruo He administration and the innovation of financial information underground methods, including the Internet, national conference, public media, posters, holiday celebrations, Ruo He build a variety of national authorities and communication channels, the progress of the national intervention, promote the exercise of national democratic power, improving administrative efficiency, treatment the lack of financial results. The theory confirms the German intervention budget system and achieved certain results. Germany and China's current situation is very similar, facing the strange economic and social performance, the tax reform in 2003, local authority financial state of unprecedented important, important relation between the cadres and the masses to stimulate the conflict and conflict have repeatedly emerged. Although China stopped some intrusive budget experiment, however there are some places where the lack of, like insufficient information transparent, institutional supply lag, lack of social justice, to intervene in the main constraints to a single intervention rate higher. If able to create their own fumble in Berlin Lichtenberg underground information, national intervention, political consultation and perfect the lower plain near the main experience in promoting, a fill theory in China by the lack of places, break through the existing financial predicament, reform the lower plain near the main management format, the implementation of direct democracy rail system has great significance. 目录: |
