|
【摘要】：
近年来,随着全球化趋势的加强和中国经济的迅猛发展,越来越多的德国企业进驻中国市场。然而,由于中德两国文化、价值观等的异同,中德员工的时间观念存在一定的分歧,并成为双方之间误解、沟通失败的导火索。对此,本文将就中德公司员工的时间观念进行全面、深入的探讨略论,为管理层就如何减少、消除该类冲突提供借鉴。
本文试图考察中德公司员工的时间观念异同。在对时间探讨方面的理论与实践成果做文献回顾后,作者使用了单向-多向,过去-现在-未来取向等文化维度,重点略论了中德员工在时间观念上的不同点,并相应得出了六个建设性假设。本文采用定量略论法,分别以德国本土企业与中国本土企业的员工为考察对象。通过发放、回收问卷、略论数据,作者分别从六大方面对假设进行了深入、具体的论证,包括:单向-多向,过去-现在-未来取向,守时,工作与谈判节奏把握,工作、生活平衡,长期-短期取向等。最后,本文指出了探讨的局限性,并对中德跨国公司在时间管理等方面提出了一些建议。
【关键词】：跨文化 时间观念 时间管理
论文摘要4-5 Abstract5-10 Chapter 1 Introduction10-13 1.1 Rational & Possible Significance10-11 1.2 Research Methodology11-12 1.3 Structure of the Thesis12-13 Chapter 2 Literature Review13-30 2.1 Culture13-20 2.1.1 Features of Culture13 2.1.2 Characteristics of Culture13-14 2.1.3 Definitions of Culture14-16 2.1.4 Cultural Patterns16-20 2.1.4.1 Hofstede’s Value Dimensions16-19 2.1.4.2 Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Value Orientations19-20 2.2 Time and Culture20-30 2.2.1 Western Perspectives on Time21-28 2.2.1.1 Hall’s Monochronic and Polychronic Classification22-23 2.2.1.2 Informal Time Study23-25 2.2.1.3 Kaufman’s Revised Polychronic Aptitude Index25-26 2.2.1.4 Kluckhohn’s Psychology of Time26-27 2.2.1.5 Zimbardo’s Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory27-28 2.2.2 Chinese Perspectives on Time28-30 2.2.2.1 Chinese Ancient Philosophies28-29 2.2.2.2 Contemporary Studies29-30 Chapter 3 Research Methodology30-40 3.1 General Introduction to Hypotheses30-35 3.1.1 Hypothesis Concerning Monochronic vs. Polychronic Time30-31 3.1.2 Hypothesis Concerning Past vs. Future Orientation31-32 3.1.3 Hypothesis Concerning Informal Time32-34 3.1.3.1 Hypothesis Concerning Punctuality32-33 3.1.3.2 Hypothesis Concerning Pace33-34 3.1.4 Hypothesis Concerning Work-Life Balance34 3.1.5 Hypothesis Concerning Long-term Orientation34-35 3.2 Instruments35-37 3.2.1 Revised Polychronic Aptitude Index36 3.2.2 Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory36-37 3.2.3 Hofstede’s Values Survey Module 199437 3.3 Research Subjects37-39 3.4 Procedure39-40 Chapter 4 Data Analysis and Discussion40-58 4.1 Analysis of Hypothesis 1: Monochronic vs. Polychronic Time40-43 4.2 Analysis of Hypothesis 2: Past vs. Future Orientation43-48 4.3 Analysis of Hypothesis 3 and 4: Informal time (Punctuality & Pace)48-51 4.3.1 Hypothesis 3: Punctuality49-50 4.3.2 Hypothesis 4: Pace50-51 4.4 Analysis of Hypothesis 5: Work-Life Balance51-54 4.5 Analysis of Hypothesis 6: Long-term Orientation54-58 Chapter 5 Conclusion58-62 5.1 Overall Summary58-59 5.2 Limitations of the Study59-60 5.3 Recommendations60-62 ，德语论文，德语论文题目 |
