| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 对于刑事案件不告状后，被害人的救援成绩我国和德国均有类似的划定，即，我国在司法实际和实务界所称的“公诉转自诉轨制”和德国刑事诉讼法中自力的司法设置“强迫告状法式”（Klageerzwingungsverfahren）。在本文共分为四个部门。第一部门为引言；第二部门具体引见德国强迫告状法式；第三部门扼要论述我国公诉转自诉轨制；第四部门就中德两国的司法划定与理论实用停止比拟并思虑我国公诉转自诉轨制的完美。第一部门引言引见了本文的写作启事，即，我国当今非常无限的德国刑事诉讼法研究材料及我国粹者对于德国强迫告状法式的自创兴致。第二部门引见德国的不告状轨制和强迫告状法式。这部门重要由德国相干文献的翻译组成，笔者在此的目标就是要客不雅周全地引见德国刑事诉讼法的相干轨制，德语论文范文，一方面为了更好地比拟中德轨制，另外一方面也是可认为我们在此成绩的研究供给客不雅的直接的德文材料。该部门第一节引见了德国不告状的以下几种情形第一，缺乏刑事追诉性的不告状。第二，轻罪不告状。第三，能够免去科罚的不告状。第四，简化法式的不告状。第五，其他情形的不告状。最初一类不告状为，在案件不存在刑事追诉的公共好处时，审查院可以将案件交与被害人作自诉案件处置。第二节论述德国强迫告状法式的汗青沿革。而当今的德国强迫告状法式实用规模重要消除了根据审查官的裁量权作出的轻罪不告状。根据德公法被害人须要起首在州审查官处请求前置抗告，假如其要求不被知足，可以向州上诉法院提起强迫告状请求。州上诉法院如受理请求，可采用再次侦察办法，但详细由审查院担任履行。假如州上诉法院以为审查院的不告状决议不正当可以判决作出强迫告状。第三节引见德国实际界就强迫告状法式的商量和理论后果。今朝商量的成绩重要环绕“被害人"的概念界定和审查官的裁量不告状消除实用成绩。本节重要就后一成绩作具体引见。今朝德国实际有不雅点建议将轻罪不告状归入强迫告状法式，也有保存看法。在理论中强迫告状法式实用率较少，但实际界以为这一法式是保证法定准绳的平安阀，根本持积极立场。第三部门评论辩论我国的不告状轨制和公诉转自诉轨制。公诉转自诉轨制在我国或经由过程被害人向上一级国民审查院申述后提起自诉，或被害人直接向国民法院提起自诉。这一轨制自其设立以来屡屡遭到实际界的批驳，其实用率很小。第四部门起首就中德轨制在公诉与自诉辨别与转化、立法目标、司法划定与正文及理论后果等方面作比拟，随后就我国轨制的完美提出了几点思虑起首，我们的实用规模可将裁夺不告状消除实用，但审查院自侦案件的裁夺不告状不得消除。其次，笔者还就一些详细法式操作成绩提出了几点建议，在某些成绩上我们可以自创德国的强迫告状法式，某些成绩应当就我国的现实情形作出选择。 Abstract: Don't complain about the criminal case, the victim of the rescue achievement of China and Germany had a similar designation, namely, China referred to in judicial practice and practice of "private prosecution indictment system" and the German criminal law judicial independence set "forced the French complain" (Klageerzwingungsverfahren). This paper is divided into four sections. The first part is the introduction; the second sector specific introduction Germany forced French third departments are briefly discussed.; China's public prosecution to private prosecution system; the fourth sector between China and Germany and the practical boundary of judicial theory and thinking in China more perfect public prosecution to private prosecution system. The first part is the introduction introduces the writing reason, namely, China's very limited German criminal procedural law research materials and the quintessence of Chinese culture on my own interest in French German force. The second Department introduced Germany against the system and forced the French. This important part of the paper is to introduce the relevant system of German criminal procedure law. On the other hand, we can consider the direct Devin material for the study of the results. The Department of the first section introduced the following several cases of Germany does not complain of the lack of the first criminal prosecution, not to complain. Second, do not complain of misdemeanor. Third, can be removed from the penalty not to complain. Fourth, simplify the French not to complain. Fifth, other circumstances not to complain. The first class is not to complain, the public benefits of criminal prosecution does not exist in the case when the hospital can review the case to pay for disposal of private prosecution and the victim. The second section discusses the historical evolution of the French German forces. Today's Germany forced the French utility scale to eliminate the important complaints made according to the discretion of the censor of the misdemeanor not to complain. According to the German law to the victim first officer at the request of pre counterappeal in state examination, if the requirements are not satisfied, can apply to the state court of appeals filed a request to force. State court of appeal, such as the admissibility of the request, can be used again to detect the approach, but the detailed review of the hospital as a performance. If the state court of appeals that review court resolution not to complain of unfair judgment can be forced. The third section introduces the German theorists force and discuss the theoretical consequences of the French. The present result is important discuss concept of "victim" around the definition and censor discretion not to complain to eliminate the practical results. This section is an important part of the post a specific introduction. At present, the German actual indecent suggestions will not complain to complain forced misdemeanor French, have saved views. The utility rate is less in the French forced complain theory, but the actual world thought the French is to ensure the safety valve of legal principle, the fundamental positive position. The third sector review debate in our country does not complain system and the public prosecution to private prosecution system. Public prosecution to private prosecution system in China or through the process of the victim to the upper level of the national audit institute representations or bring a private prosecution, the victim brought a private prosecution directly to the people's court. This system since its establishment has been refuted the theory, its rate is very small. The fourth sector first German rail system in the public prosecution and private prosecution discrimination and transformation, legislative goal, judicial delimitation and text and theoretical consequences of such aspects as comparison, then put forward several ideas first perfect our country system, we can decide not to complain the utility scale to eliminate the practical, but review court self investigation cases you may not remove not to complain. Secondly, the author also puts forward some suggestions on some with French operation results, in some achievements we can learn from the German forced French complain, some achievements should be given the choice of the reality of the situation in china. 目录: |
