| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，德语论文题目，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 中国、美国、德国的竞技体育程度处于世界前列，这反应了三个国度在造就优良活动员体系体例方面的特色和长处。以往的研究多集中于中美之间，或许中德之间优良活动员造就体系体例的比拟，而将三个国度配合停止比拟研究的很少，这是本文研究的意义地点。本文以中、美、德三国优良活动员造就体系体例的比拟为研究对象，采取文献材料法、比拟剖析法、专家访谈法，起首对三个国度优良活动员造就的内部情况停止了比拟；其次对三个国度优良活动员造就的主体和途径停止了比拟；最初对三个国度优良活动员造就的外部治理轨制停止了比拟。在上述比拟剖析的基本上，得出以下结论：1。中、美、德三个国度优良活动员造就体系体例所处的内部情况分歧，德语论文，从而招致三个国度优良活动员造就的主体、途径和外部治理轨制分歧。2。改造开放前，中国可以或许在短时光内有用地调动和集中人力、物力、财力，敏捷进步活动竞技成就。改造开放后，固然优良活动员的造就主体和途径慢慢开端多元化，但体育主管部分还是优良活动员造就主体的主导力气，这弗成防止地涌现一些局限性，作用中国竞技体育的可连续成长。3。美国和德国优良活动员造就体系体例的配合点是造就目的和造就途径的多元化；统筹了活动员的练习和文明进修，完整比赛系统及治理标准等。两个国度的分歧点在于，因为实施分歧的社会经济轨制，美国对体育事务简直没有干涉；而德国当局有必定的介入，在社会保证和活动员保证方面较之美国更加完美。在上述结论的基本上，本文提出的建议是：1。我国优良活动员造就体系体例改造应将美国和德国的优势相联合，并依据我国的国情，在具有中国特点社会主义市场经济体系体例下，在包管各活动项目竞技程度稳固其实不断进步的条件下，渐进式地改造以往高度集中的举国体系体例式的优良活动员造就体系体例。2。将来我国优良活动员造就主体和造就途径应当多元化。造就主体和造就途径的重要改造目的是构成体育部分，黉舍，体育俱乐部三者多元互动合营的格式，并将优良活动员造就的重心逐步转移到以黉舍和体育俱乐部为主之上。3。将来我国优良活动员造就的外部治理轨制改造的侧重点是：依据社会情况和人们不雅念的变更调剂对优良活动员所付与的义务；对我国优良活动员的鼓励政策要灵巧多样；将优良活动员的保证安顿义务逐步由当局部分转移到黉舍和体育俱乐部；树立完整的比赛系统；健全部育司法学例系统。 Abstract: China, the United States, Germany, the level of competitive sports in the forefront of the world, which reflects the characteristics and strengths of the three countries in creating a good system of activities. Previous studies have mostly focused on the comparison between China and the United States, perhaps between Chinese and German members of the system to create a system, but the three countries to stop more research is very little, this is the significance of this study. In this paper, the United States and Germany excellent activities member creating systems of the match as the research object, take the literature material law, the comparison analytic method, expert interview chapeau of internal situation created by the three countries excellent players compared; secondly to three national excellent athletes created by the subject and the way to carry on the comparison; originally of three national excellent player created by external governance rail system to carry on the comparison. On the base of the above analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. In China, the United States, Germany and the three countries of the excellent event members create a system of internal differences in the style of the system, which led to the three countries to create a good athlete, the way and external governance system differences. 2. Before the reform and opening up, China may be able to mobilize and focus on human, material and financial resources in a short period of time. After the policy of reform and opening to the outside world, although excellent players creating subject and the way slowly beginning diversified, but sports departments or excellent players create the subject leading strength, the Eph into to prevent the emergence of some limitations, affect the competitive sports in China, the continuous growth. 3. The United States and Germany, the United States to create a system of active members of the system is the purpose of creating a diversity of ways to co-ordinate the activities of the training and education, complete competition system and governance standards, etc.. Differences of the two countries is that because of the implementation of different social economic system, United States to the sports affairs almost no interference; and the German authorities have certain intervention, in social security and assurance aspects compared with the more perfect. Based on the above conclusions, the paper puts forward the suggestions: 1. Our excellent players create system reform should be the combination of advantages of the United States and Germany, and according to China's national conditions, with Chinese characteristics of the socialist market economic system, in order to ensure the project athletics level solid actually under the condition of continuous progress, gradually into the transformation of the former high concentrated the whole nation system style style excellent players train systems. 2. In the future, we should make the subject and the way to be diversified. Creates subject and creating ways of transformation is intended to constitute part of the sports, schools, sports clubs of joint multivariate interaction format and create excellent players focus gradually shifted to the schools and sports clubs based. 3. Future emphasis of creating excellent activity in China external governance rail system reform is: according to the social situation and people's thinking changes to adjust the excellent players given the obligation; incentives to our excellent activity to nimble diverse; the guarantee of excellent players Ann Dayton obligations gradually by the authorities transferred to schools and sports clubs; establish a complete match system; Ministry of sound education laws and regulations system. 目录: |
