| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 第二次世界年夜战以后，跟着国际经济来往和国际平易近商事关系的成长，传统的缺少灵巧性的抵触标准曾经难以顺应新的须要，而赓续出现出的列国国际立法合营接踵缔结的国际条约，德语论文网站，和层见叠出的国际私法新实际，推进着国际私法律说一日千里的成长。个中，欧盟同一国际私法作为区域性国际私法同一活动的代表，为国际私法趋异化，做出了无益的摸索。同时，在欧盟成员国际部，国际私法的欧盟化也作为一年夜趋向流传开来。个中，德语论文范文，国际平易近事诉讼法式法是欧盟同一化中成长最为敏捷的范畴。欧盟从树立之初至今，经由过程了一系列条约、条例和指令等调和平易近商事管辖权和判决的认可与履行方面的抵触，为完成其判决“自在活动”的目的停止着不懈的尽力。特别是从《布鲁塞尔条约》到《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅰ》、《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅱ》和《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅱa》的布鲁塞尔系统为代表，构成了一套调和区际平易近商事管辖权和判决的认可与履行抵触的规矩系统范本。本文经由过程司法说明和司法推理的办法，综合实证剖析与司法比拟的思绪，以布鲁塞尔系统在德国的认可和履行为参照，引见并剖析布鲁塞尔系统下德国国际平易近事诉讼法式法的欧盟化，从而对欧盟同一国际私法的区际性调和停止详细的透视。 Abstract: After the Second World War, along with the growth of international economic relations and the plain near commercial relations, the traditional lack of dexterity of contradiction standards have been difficult to adapt to the new needs, and continuously appear out of the nations international legislation of the joint venture in succession to conclude international treaties, and the layer see stack of private international law practice, promote the development of the doctrine of private international law by leaps and bounds. Among them, the same international law as regional private international law the same activities as representatives of private international law convergence, has made useful exploration. At the same time, the EU members of the International Department of private international law, EU also as a trend spread. Among them, the international civil litigation law is one of the French grew the most agile category. EU from building since the early process of a series of treaties, regulations and directives to reconcile the plain near commercial jurisdiction right and judgment recognition and enforcement through the conflict, for the completion of its judgment "freedom of movement" to stop the indefatigable effort. Especially from the Treaty of Brussels to the Brussels I regulation, the Brussels II of regulations and the Brussels I regulation II a "Brussels system as the representative, constitute the recognition of a harmonic interregional plain near commercial jurisdiction and the right decision and perform the conflict rules of the system model. This article through the process of judicial explanation and judicial reasoning and comprehensive empirical comparative analysis and judicial thoughts, the Brussels system in Germany's recognition and perform as a reference, the introduction and analysis of the Brussels system under the German international plain recent litigation procedural law of the European Union, from and to the EU private international law interregional of harmony to stop a detailed perspective. 目录: 内容摘要 4-5 Abstract 5 引言 8-9 一、欧盟统一国际私法概况 9-16 （一） 欧盟的超国家性是欧盟统一国际私法基础 9-11 （二） 欧洲联盟的法学冲突 11-12 1. 欧盟法与成员国法之间的冲突 11 2. 欧盟内部各成员国内法学之间的冲突 11-12 3. 欧盟法与其他外部法学的冲突 12 （三） 从国际私法的区域性统一中看国际私法的欧洲化 12-15 1. 欧共体国际私法发展历程 12-13 2. 欧盟统一国际私法体系的构建 13-15 （四） 欧盟统一国际私法的创新理念 15-16 二、德国国际私法的欧盟化 16-20 （一） 德国国际私法法学渊源的欧盟化 17-18 （二） 欧盟统一国际私法与德国国际私法的关系 18-19 （三） 德国国际私法的欧盟化 19-20 三、欧盟布鲁塞尔体系对德国国际民事诉讼程序法的作用 20-34 （一） 布鲁塞尔体系的产生与发展 20-22 1. 1968 年《布鲁塞尔公约》的产生 21 2. 1968 年《布鲁塞尔公约》的新发展 21-22 （二） 德国国际民商事管辖权制度欧盟化 22-29 1. 1968 年《布鲁塞尔公约》对欧盟民商事管辖权的直接确定 23-26 2. 布鲁塞尔体系管辖权规范新发展以及在德国的实施 26-29 （三） 德国承认与执行外国法院判决制度的欧盟化 29-34 1. 1986 年《布鲁塞尔公约》承认与执行的实体要求 29-31 2. 布鲁塞尔体系承认与执行规范新发展以及在德国的实施 31-34 结语 34-35 致谢 35-36 参考文献 36-37 |
